patching...
Breaking: Minutes From Seaside Heights, Sandy's Destruction Still Apparent »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Adam Lambert, Train to Headline Jenkinson's Summer Blast-Off Friday

Lambert just added to line-up of annual summer event

 

Powerhouse glam rocker Adam Lambert, the 2009 American Idol runner-up, has just been added to the line-up for Jenkinson's 15th Annual Summer Blast-off on Friday morning.

The free event, scheduled from 6 to 10 a.m. and featuring performances by Lambert, Train and The Bobby Lynch Cover Band, will be hosted by Scott & Todd from the 95.5 FM WPLJ morning show, according to WPLJ.

The annual Jenkinson's summer kick-off typically draws huge crowds, and, in recent years, those who are serious about getting inside for the big-name concerts camp out as early as 9 p.m. the night before.

The concert is inside Jenkinson's Pavilion, which is large, but space is limited, said Marilou Halvorsen, Director of Jenkinson's Marketing.

For those who don't get inside, well, that's what sand chairs are for.

"A lot of people like to sit out on the beach and listen to the concert," Halvorsen noted.

News went out to Lambert fan clubs on Monday morning that he had just been added to the line-up of the popular event at Jenkinson's Boardwalk in Point Pleasant Beach.

Lambert went from being the first runner-up on American Idol's eighth season in 2009, when Kris Allen won, to a chart-topping, worldwide success as the dexterous rocker hand-picked by Queen to be their front man on tour dates in July, even as many compare his vocal strength and acrobatics to Queen's legendary Freddie Mercury.

He just performed at the PNC Bank Arts Center in Holmdel on Sunday, released a new CD, Trespassing, on May 15 and, on his website, has just announced additional tour dates.

Related Topics: Adam Lambert, American Idol, Jenk's, Memorial Day Weekend, Point Beach, Point Pleasant Beach, Radio Station, Scott and Todd, WPLJ, and jenkinson's boardwalk

Arlene D'Amato

5:45 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Free parking on Baltimore Avenue is your best bet.

Reply
Comment_arrow

randi

6:55 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

What street does that Barella pasta guy live on ?

No parking plan

6:42 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Park wherever you want because the illegal parking plan doesn't go into effect until late June. Make sure to slam your doors and chirp your car alarms.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DroppenLoads

6:55 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

This is the mentality and attitude of our "visitors" that have forced a park. plan to be
done. And I wonder how many drunk kids will have to be transported to hosp. by our First aid this year? Thanks again Jenks!

Comment_arrow

A Resident

8:29 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

DroppenLoads....how many were transported from this event last year? or the year before? or the year before?

Do you know?

Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

8:56 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

DroppenLoads, did you really think that the People Of District Four and the Mayor and Council of District Four were going to rob a hundred or more people of their income without some backlash?

Beach_N8iv

7:54 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Oh BOY, total meltdown of the D4 whiners in 5, 4, 3 . . . . .

Reply

No parking plan

8:11 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I'll have my car stereo and bass pumped to the max cruising through d4. Probably be listening to party rock.

Reply

Mike Corbally

8:39 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Special Event Application. I must have missed it. PPB taxpayers are paying for this!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

randi

8:56 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

It must have been with the letter from the County that you can't RECALL.

Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

9:00 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Randi, I really with that there was a "LIKE" button on these posts.

Comment_arrow

Politics by Barrella Corbally Tooker Gordon waste taxpayer $

11:46 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Corbally---crying about special events application----can't get anyone to go after them because your ordinance is too vague and you would lose---like you are going to do with the bar closing ordinance and the parking plan----I know you think this is good politics---but how about thinking about what is good for residents instead of what is good for politicians? Who benifited from the tax dollars you spent for parking plans signs that will be useless when you drop the plan

Comment_arrow

DroppenLoads

2:19 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Anyone see outofthe beachfornow comment?
That's one angry dude who obviously hasn't cuddled up to Mrs.outofthebeach
for a loooooooong time.

Comment_arrow

CindyLu

12:03 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

Trying to do what is good for the residents of this town. Being blocked from the special interest groups of the town who is making lots of money off the BW owners. These BW owners have become one of the same of both Seaside and Point Pleasant Beach. Both Towns are giving them way to much power. Start to say "No" as they are starting in other beach resort towns all over. Slowly but surely these owners are turning Point Pleasant Beach in to Seaside Heights. Point Pleasant Beach needs to step up with there no tolerance ordinances..No warnings....Just automatically arrest them as in Seaside. 70 arrest so far and the weekend is not even over. Close the Animal houses down.. No warnings...start giving fines to the owners of these homes and hotels. Maybe than they will stop renting to the undesirables that are coming to these beach towns.

Cathy Kelly

10:09 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The mayor testified on the bill 1914…He starts at the 25 minute mark. You can hear the testimony by going to the following link at click on the may 17, 1:00 session. At the end of the tape around the 55 min.mark. It looks like the bill passes exempting the bar,police and garbage fees for ppb. So I think that means that it is legal to do what the council is trying to do. There has been so much talk about it so I figured I would post it..

http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/media/archive_audio2.asp?KEY=SBA&SESSION=2012

Reply
Comment_arrow

Get Fact Right

12:15 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Geez Ms. Kelly I know you can’t get enough of listening to Barrella’s nonsense but do you really have to impose it on us? And you do so to support the ridiculous notion that there was action taken by the legislature that allows the Council to do what the Mayor wants in enacting the illegal bar closing ordinances. That is not true. Be nice if you got your facts right just once. Here folks is a link that provides the truth. You have to put in bill number 1914 and click on that number. http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bills/BillsByNumber.asp

As the link demonstrates the bill has not even been put on the agenda for a vote by the legislature, let alone approved. And the referenced law would do nothing about any of the legal problems with the ordinance. Compare the two websites and decide who is telling you the truth, and who is making up facts to fit her agenda.

Mr. Happy

10:27 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Relax DroppingLoads- I got this:
To Beach_knave- do you really think the mayor and council should put the best interests of the mostly out of town BW employees who rely on heavy tips from the heavily intoxicated drunks (if you were at the last council meeting, you had vivid proof) OR should they put the best interests of the people of PPB first? We report, you decide (Mr. Happy loves that saying!)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

2:29 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Try to get my name right, moron. No, I think that the Mayor and Council of District Four are doing a fine job for The Chosen Ones. Now the rest of the town has to elect people to look after OUR interests. Oh, and by the way, there are PLENTY of people who live right here in town who are going to be hurt by this onerous law. I don't think that most of "our" elected officials living in this district is a coincidence and I don't think that the State Attorney General's office will either.

Comment_arrow

Mr. Happy

2:41 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Hey, I got your name right, do you even know what a knave is? Look it up and you'll see I'm right. Mr. Happy is never wrong. And BTW knave, you "outed" yourself as a BW employee with your comment. Once again, the Mayor and council must do what is best for 5,000 residents, not 100 employees of special interests.

Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

3:26 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Mr. Dummy, I don't work on, for or near the BW, if I did I would say so. I rarely even go to the BW, too much whining in the area surrounding it, too depressing. I do, however, live in one of the districts that gets ignored except when the tax bills come out. You know, the people who don't matter to YOUR elected officials but still have to pay for your "special treatment" and the lawsuits that result from it.

SoylentGreen

10:45 am on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The PLJ Memorial Day concert has been around for some time now. I can't recall it ever being a major issue for the town. The over rated Seafood Festival is probably more of a burden on the town's resources then this concert is.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JimmyCarterIsSmarter

2:39 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The Festival of the Sea is by far worse than most events in the town. I have never seen any problems coming from the PLJ Summer Blast off

Comment_arrow

Better Living

3:16 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@ jimmycarter
Your exact words, "The Festival of the Sea is far worse than most events in the town",
...let's see how absurd your remark is.
How many events does BW have per year?
So all the BW events, including their night time events....They have less problems than the Seafood Fest?
So the town(chamber), has one event, maybe two...the wine fest. And your going to pick on the chamber about 1- 2 events all year and compare that to the BW events??.
The Chamber pays for police and garbage for both events
You need to rethink you comment...
BTW- Can you tell me what event the BW pays for boro police AND garbage pick-up?

Comment_arrow

JimmyCarterIsSmarter

3:33 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@ Better Living, Most people go to Seafood Fest to get drunk at the Elks. They need to stop the amount of alcohol consumed at that event. I have gone to the PLJ event the last 2 years and don't even think i saw 1 out of control drunk. The BW shouldn't have to pay for extra police. Oh but here we go again with closing the bars early that will now reduce the amount of money brought in to this town. Just grow up and focus on the joy of this event, instead of you harping on the flaws of this town. Run for mayor or council if you don't like it. GROW UP!

Comment_arrow

A Resident

3:43 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Better Living...the Chamber only started paying a reasonable amount 2 years ago....and they fought that tooth and nail. Prior to that they paid nowhere near what the actual cost of the LEO's were. Check council minutes...they went to meetings to fight the bill from the PD. And not so sure they pay for DPW guys for the day.

Is the Festival of the Sea a hassle? You bet. But it's 1 day of the year. People can deal with it.

Comment_arrow

Better Living

4:25 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@jimmycarter
Really? Most people go to the Sea Fest to get drunk?
I think your wrong. I don't...my neighbors, my friends don't? I have a lot of friends from out of town that come to this event and don't come here to get drunk.
That is such a blanket statement with out proof.
The way I see it most FAMILIES come here to eat, shop at the arts and crafts and enjoy the music in the middle of town.
JFYI- I don't even make my way up to the Elks. The Elks event is seperate than the Seafood Fest. They apply for their own permits and are opportunitistic because they coordinate it on the same day.

Comment_arrow

Better Living

4:45 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@jimmycarter
Why would you be telling me to grow up? I'm commenting on your post?
Maybe you should look at your ealier post-Your the one pointing a finger at the Sea Fest. Dont be saying its ok for one business to have an event. And then not give a fair shake to a NON-PROFIT business(chamber) which profits ALL businesses in town, not just one (BW)..... AND you do not know the facts. Go complain about the Elks, not about the chamber....
You apparently have Grown Up, but not to bright ;)

Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

4:45 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I was wondering what you malcontents would go after if you succeeded destroying the boardwalk, now I know. Don't forget the Farmer's Market. You could spend some time sniveling about that too.

Comment_arrow

Better Living

4:51 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@jimmycarter
BTW- I dont need to run for council or mayor.
The current council I voted for seems to be doing a great job so far!!!!..lol....lol

Comment_arrow

Better Living

5:05 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@Beach
..it's not about destroying the BW. It's about keeping the quality of life, and keeping the undesirables away. The BW advertising in Newark and Asbury Park is not going to help the matter. Free or discounted train passes? That is not the type of clientele WE would want? The council is limited as to what they can do. If that means hitting the BW in their pockets where it hurts...then so be it.

Cathy Kelly

12:30 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

get facts,,I said "I THINK" unlike you some people do actually think,,haha

Reply
Comment_arrow

Get Fact Right

12:44 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Where do you get the idea extra fees would be exempt in our case? Did you read the Bill? Yes you said I think----but what you thought was what you wanted to think---there is nothing anywhere to make anyone think the bill was passed by the legislature. And the bill has nothing to do with what the council is trying to do---you just want to think so. READ THE BILL and tell me where it says PPB will be exempt and tell me where you get the idea the legislature passed the bill? How about sticking to what you know instead of what you wish was true?

Cathy Kelly

12:50 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Obviously you did not listen to the questions and answers on the hearing...if you did,you would not make such ridiculous comments,,,oh geez.....

Reply

Spooner

12:56 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Ms. Kelly...as usual you distort the facts. That was just a hearing on the bill. There was no vote! Nothing Barrella said is new. Same old duplicitous arguments. . .And while we're at posting documents on 'patch'. . .why hasn't the Mayor submitted his 5 page letter he sent to the Senate Committee prior to the hearing?

...now let's talk about the Mayor's numbers: he claimed the town would employ 109 police, costing $400,000. When asked: said the town got $1.2M in Court revenue last year. He also said BW pays $250,000 in property municipal taxes. . .when you add that money with what the BW offered for each year($160,000)...that comes to $410,000...more than enough to pay for the police. I won't get into what else he said. . don't want to upset the "Residents First" gang on Parkway too much. . .they weren't listening?

Reply

Get Fact Right

12:58 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Ms.Kelly---Instead of calling people names, like insane, why not just stick to the issues? You do know the difference between what Barrella says and what the legislature does, don't you? I ask again, when you look at the link I posted where do you get the idea the bill passed the legislature, and where do you get the idea that the bill, as reported out of committee, has anything to do with what the Council is trying to do? Has it dawned on you yet that if the legislature needs to take action for the Council to do what they want to do, then the Council doesn't have the power and your attention should be directed to Trenton and not New Jersey Avenue?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Get Fact Right

1:16 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Because the issue is not who caught you---the issue is did you do it? By comparing the two links and what you said you each and every one of us can determine for themselves---- either misrepresented what took place or you did not---seems pretty clear to me

A Resident

1:07 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I have not listened to the audio. I looked at the bill as posted on the Legislative site, which is what the committee has voted on and approved. It's not many pages, just a few. Read what the committee approved. You can also link to the Assembly version of the bill.

Reply

Get Fact Right

2:03 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The audio means the Mayor is continuing to argue that PPB needs to be given special treatment because of the number of mis-behaved tourists we have. Unfortunately, because PPB’s taxes are low, and the legislature has communities with much greater needs to help, it does not look like the legislature is going to provide the power to the Council that the Council would have to have to do what it has been trying to do. In addition, the audio makes it clear that all of the traditional ways municipalities have raised revenue are going to remain intact. The bill also makes clear that services that municipalities usually provide, like police, cannot be charged for separately. The “clarification” at the end does not help because, as Barrella noted, the language of the bill, as reported out of committee, would not allow any fees to be imposed for special police in a residential district.

Now answer my questions

1) Was the bill passed by the legislature, as you said?

2) Does the bill permit the pay to stay open ordinance or does it just talk about whether the money collected, if allowed, would be included in the 2% cap?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Get Fact Right

3:22 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Cathy, the bill does not say that---neither did the assemblyman---he said you could charge for extra police to cover a business or bar district----that might maybe allow for police on the BW, but not in district 4-----and the bill says nothing about if you can charge the fee---DCA and ABC says you can't----bill is about what counts under the cap and what does not

Comment_arrow

Get Fact Right

3:41 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

yes I am---the legislators and the Mayor were not sure what the language meant--------Mayoy talked about garbage from rentals on Ocean Ave, legislator spoke of "bussiness district"-----but the Mayor was asking for any money collected under the pay to stay open ordinance to be exempt from the cap---which I think is what you mean when you say exempt from the bill---but it is misleading to state that the bill passed, and it is very misleading to suggest that the bill has anything to do with the legality of the pay to stay open scheme---the bill only talks about if the money is collected does it count against the cap---bill does not change the fact that pay to stay open is illegal----look, this isn't some kind of bizarre competition---I just wanted to set the record straight

Comment_arrow

Cathy Kelly

3:48 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Ray,Christie has GUARANTEED that there would be a bill passed and a law into effect by July 1,in numerous articles. It is not a question of whether the bill is going to pass. I would gamble that it will definately pass. With that being said,it WAS clarified that it would not affect what the Mayor is trying to do...Go to 55.23 minutes on the tape please and tell me what it is that you hear....Also can you please show me in writing where it states that that paying a fee to stay open later is Illegal...thanks...I'm not in any competition,you were the one that attacked me,remember?

Comment_arrow

Get Fact Right

4:16 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Cathy---no question a bill will pass that will mandate that any new user fees imposed by a municipality will count towards the 2% cap---that bill will get passed---at 55:23 the legislator says any fee for garbage collection in a “business district” would be outside the cap. He then says that special police in a “business area” “will be exempt [from the cap] anyway, so you can do that.” This means that an assessment for special police in a business district would not count towards the 2% cap.
The present pay to stay open ordinance is illegal because, according to the DCA letter. “The conjunctive nature of 2012-15 and 2012-16 suggests that the Borough is looking to use its power to regulate closing times as a means to increase liquor license fees more than ten times what would he permitted by state statute.”
“As you know, municipalities are only permitted to exercise those powers expressly granted to them under law. However, the Borough appears to be undertaking an unlawful effort to institute a fee that it has no power to institute.”

Comment_arrow

Spooner

5:33 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

...not to belabor the point...but the bill was left unchanged(not amended). . .and moved out of committee with clarifications as 'Get Fact Right' stated. . .and again we'll ask Councilman Corbally or who ever. . .was there an application filed for this event and a fee attached. . .oh that's right Corbally said he must have missed it? So Mr Mayor what was accomplished last Thursday afternoon at the hearing. . .other than what I believe it was Senator Sardo commenting: about police & fees for events outside the cap. . .

JimmyCarterIsSmarter

2:47 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

People clearly turn a fun concert that is held every year in to a political disaster. You all need to just shut up and stay focused on the subject of the article.

Reply

Mr. Happy

4:48 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The biggest travesty of all of this is the fact that the BW pays 250K in property taxes.
Anyone else catch that little fact? That and the immense burden on services which is why we are here in the first place. How about 10, just 10 McMansions @ 50K per in taxes. Yeah that's right, double the tax revenue, with 99% less burden on resources.
But where will we go, Mr. Happy if we want to walk and see the ocean? How about a 5 minute drive to immaculate Sea Girt; maybe you can't get your pretzel or cotton candy, but there is no stench and no "jersey shore" crowd. Let's face it folks, it's all only a matter of time now.

Reply

Part Timer

5:01 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Thank you all for a fun filled day.
Go fly your flags, clean the BBQ, ice the cooler and enjoy your weekend.

Reply

Better Living

5:15 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@ mr happy
What????The BW pays JUST 250 k in property taxes????
If that is the truth it's peanuts!!
Please anyone else confirm????

Reply

Mike Corbally

5:30 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Beach_N8IV, Aren't their 3 Councilmen living in your District? All of the Council People work for what is in the best interest of all residents, not District Specific.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

5:49 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Could have fooled me, I don't see ANY action on "quality of life" issues here. BTW, how did these three councilmen vote on the bar closing and parking laws?

Comment_arrow

Mr. Happy

10:16 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Hey Mike Corbally- If you plan to write a book after all this, keep in mind
Glen Beck has already used the title "Arguing with Idiots."

Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

11:20 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

So where does Mr. Happytroll stand on "quality of life" issues in the rest of the town? Since he's now admitted to be a Glenn Beck fan I better understand his brand of brain death AND I can ignore him happily.

Mr. Happy

5:37 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@Better living--yessir, that's it 250K in taxes. That's from Spooner post at 1256 PM of the transcript from mayor's testimony. But, of course it used to be more, but, well you know the old story, they challenged their tax bill and with deep pockets and friends in high places, the town had to settle for the reduction. When Paul Mulshine was on 101.5 saying this, even the anti-Barella hosts on that show were shocked at this. Even the BW spinsters can't deny that this is an outrage.

Reply

Better Living

5:51 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@vanessa
@Mr happy
....wow, since the BW offered 800k over 5yrs(w/o batting an eyelash), wondering what the BW REALLY could afford to give us?
Makes you think?

Reply
Comment_arrow

bayboat

8:21 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

The function of govt isnt to fleece the local business for "what they can REALLY afford to give."
The function of govt is to take the BARE MINIMUM needed to function and stay out of our way.

Comment_arrow

CindyLu

12:10 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

A lot more than they do...wait they haven't been making out to good.. The BW is not making any money and the reason they requested a tax reduction on the low amount they already paid. The amount was granted and now it has to be spread out amongst all the residents. They just are not making enough money. They are riding on the fact the economy was bad. Baloney there is nothing wrong with the economy at the boardwalk.

Spooner

6:11 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Happy: like I said. . .the town got enough money to cover the $400,000 police cost. . . with $250K Barrella claims(difficult to ascertain from County records) and the $160K the BW offered. . .Then Corbally, Tooker and Gordon...pandering to the "Residents First" cabal. . .put an end to that? Now as of today. . .there's NO money, one lawsuit and possibly others coming down the pike. . .not to mention the states involvement over the bar closings. . .What was it Barrella said at the hearing about lost state revenue?. . .How many 10's of thousands of dollars we talking about Mayor ...maybe Dept of Taxation can answer that question. . .and doesn't that money go to support state services. . .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Better Living

6:52 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

@spooner
With your above comment, it's sounds like the BW...would just about or would cover all its own summer costs laid upon the town? Correct?
To me, its not worth having the BW. As a resident, who wants to deal with all the summer time crowd crap? How does the residents of PPB benefit?...
...we do all the suffering.

Comment_arrow

Mr. Happy

7:46 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Isn't it interesting that the person responsible for more posts than,,,well, the post office, now has difficulty ascertaining county records (the easiest to get, BTW)??
Just goes to show you that they are now backpeddling faster than Deion Sanders trying to cover Jerry Rice on a post pattern. Sorry Ladies for the analogy. It means they have lost and a TD (touchdown) is about to be scored.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

10:33 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Happy- gave Barrella the benefit of the doubt. . .so here's the website and you do the math. Type in Jenkinsons and add up all their BW property taxes. . .comes to more than $250K...again there might be inconsistencies, because of the reassessment appeals that might have or have not have been posted...

http://red1oc.taxrecords.com/cgi-bin/DOTAXMAPFORM?account=c6000101

Better Living: tourist bring money to many town businesses. . .those business properties are assessed. That assessment is in part determined on how successful those businesses are by their revenue(i.e. how much someone would want to pay to own or buy that business) If these businesses go under and can't be sold...that eventually will affect their property value. Commercial property values goes down. . .residential property owners will have to pickup more of the tax levy. . .

Better Living

6:12 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

With the above numbers from Happy and Van Rudd, BW does nothing for the town of PPB....might as well shut it down! I don't want to hear about all the jobs the BW provides. When I bought my house, I don't remember a stipulation in my mortgage that says this town must employ ppl to work on the BW

Reply

For the clueless

7:26 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

For you clueless simple minded people like better living, Rudd, and Happy : the boardwalk pays much more in property taxes than 250k. That 250k is Barrella trying to spin things his way to make it look like a low number to the taxpayers. He leaves out that the 250k he refers to is just the municipal portion of the tax bill which is the smallest portion of the tax bill, roughly 22%. They also pay the school portion of the taxes (49%) and the county portion (29%). To put this in terms for the small minded to understand just look at your tax bill, lets say you pay $8,000 in taxes, your municipal portion you pay is only $1,760, pretty remarkable right !! So when Vin the spin tries to tell you the boardwalk only pays 250k in property taxes he is full of sh**.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BNRinPOINT

1:54 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

$1760.00 municipal taxes that pays for Police services, Garbage pickup, D.P.W. and all the staff in boro hall not to mention other entities funded such as Fire Dept. First Aid and special intrests. I don't think any other municipality can claim such a low tax rate with high home values. I don"t think the residents in this town should complain about what they think the boardwalk is not paying for, and be thankful for how little they pay for the excellent service they receive.

blindbert

7:28 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Most of the jobs are not even minimum wage. Go ask the people ( the Eastern Europeans, Russians and from the Islands) that work on the BW. They get about $5 an hour. Some kids from town still get jobs up there, but it was not like it used to be.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Arlene D'Amato

7:58 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Not clear what you are talking about. I grew up in town and worked at Jenk's for 50 cents per hour in 1965.

For the clueless

7:36 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Seriously, Pat and Dave should just shut all operations down for the summer. Close the beach, rides, bars, food places, and stands. Let the town go bankrupt with no visitors pumping the meters and no tickets to be written. Let all the hotels default. Come back next year after the town loses about 3 million in revenue and buy everything up that went bankrupt. It will be the only way to get people like Barrela to say the town can not survive without the boardwalk. And for all you morons comparing us to Sea Girt, are you prepared to fire 2/3 of the police department and dpw workers because we can become Sea Girt and they won't be needed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DroppenLoads

8:24 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Yeah, I agree!! Let em close up everything. I can finally go to the boards in the summer and not deal with the scummer!! For the clueless-best post yet!! Gracias!
At least I will have 1 year of peace in this town.

Comment_arrow

Alrighty-than

10:40 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I so agree! Hope they shutdown and see what your precious town becomes!

Alrighty-than

10:41 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

PPB was a resort town for years! All you complaing should move the hell out!

Reply

Mr. Happy

11:07 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Another 2 for 1 from Mr. Happy:
To Alrighty-than: It's actually Alrighty-Then and complaing is not a word. Work on it.
To Spooner: yes Mr. Happy is here to correct you too. The premise that land value is tied to income is so very bogus. If you take a pay cut/loss of income, will your property value and taxes go down? Certainly not. Do you really think ocean front property value will change whether or not there is a million dollar or a one dollar in income? Same answer. That is to say, same value. But thanks for posting that link that brought to light what the BW pays in taxes. Now, you're doing something to help . There may be help for you yet.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Alrighty-than

11:18 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Mr Happy, people can choose WHATEVER screen name they want too and write it HOWEVER they want.And not everyone"s typing is 100% correct. So go take your Mighty,Im so smart attitude to some English classroom.We as adults,dont need your corrections! A-h-o-l--e..Correct that!

Comment_arrow

Spooner

11:39 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Happy...how many buyers you got lined up. . .taking tickets are they?. . .Whose buying . . .with Barrella and "Residents First" running the town?

Mr. Happy

11:46 pm on Tuesday, May 22, 2012

You must be new here son. Mr. Happy corrects all errors: factual (you wouldn't believe some of the things I've had to correct), grammatical, spelling. You might say I'm the Patch Police, so to speak. So clean up the grammer- and now the language- and you'll be just fine. To be clear, I will again quote Gunnery Sgt. Hartmann (Full Metal Jacket)--work on it!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ruth Liss

7:51 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Mr. Happy, may I correct your error - I believe it's spelled grammar, not grammer. You need to work on it!

Mr. Happy

12:09 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Beach knave, when the other districts have marauders running wild at 3 AM, maybe we can discuss quality of life issues there. And who said I was a Glen Beck fan?
I just mentioned a book he wrote. Do you read, knave? I mean books, knave, books; not just the Patch and Ocean Star. Broaden your horizons knave, then maybe we can raise the bar and have a sensible debate.

Reply

Spooner

5:15 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Happy- Beck on "Defense of Capitalism"...or his other revisionist stuff. Defense of Capitalism kind of anti Barrella don't you think?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Happy

8:17 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Spooner-we're all taking the night off. Relax and take the poll I posted under one of the other stories. I think you might like it.

Spelling Police

10:43 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Mr. (maybe even Mrs., Ms., or Miss) UN-Happy---Though you fashion yourself as some sort of genius elite member of the mensa society---and while YOU may even think you're very sharp and witty---the TRUTH is---you're just another one of those rube-esque "knaves" lacking a social identity---a perfect match for the current group of "misfits" that have found their perceived niche in the world of small-town local politics!
Since YOU have assumed the self-imposed duty of correcting others----lest I return the favor. "Grammer" as you reference above---should be spelled "Grammar." "Sponsered" as you cited in a different article----should actually read "sponsored." Shall I continue Happy-less-ness? Perhaps the use of a dictionary might be helpful to keep beside your computer while you post away--- throughout the night and day? Ooo---I'm a poet and I didn't even know it! And you Happy are......well......Nah----I'll leave that one alone. Why pick on the helpless, hopeless, happless? Besides---you've already been santioned by Ms. DiStephan once or twice for being a crude and vulgar dimwit. No need to reinforce your insecurities and weaknesses. Pity for you shall suffice.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Happy

7:49 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

What do you get when you cross a disgruntled Republican and waaaaaaaaay too much alcohol? That answer is self evident. And I hope I am in the golf cart behind him today when he falls out at the golf outing.

Cathy Kelly

11:00 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

ok,I was asked to repost haha.......
.Mr.Happy, I was taking a break from posting but I have to say many people are guessing who you are, and many,many more just want to shake your hand,haha...I have been asked if I know you and if I can put people in touch with you,unfortunately I don't and I can't, but I have to tell you that you have developed a fan club,haha....through conversations and emails,I have to tell you that people agree with you and are happy that you are posting,haha

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spelling Police

11:26 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

ok, I was asked to reveal haha......
Cathy Kelly is just another rube-esque "knave"----the Cruise Director sailing on the chipped iceberg---to the Land of Misfit Toys----trolling for another argument she can't & won't win.
hehe,,,hoho,,,haha,,,lol,,,lmao,,,heidi-ho, let's-go,,,
juuuuuussssttt saaaaaaaayyyiinnnn, PUPPET WATCHER!!!!
Holy $H***, Sometimes I really crack myself up,,,hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Cathy Kelly

12:34 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Spelling,Iresponded to your other post out of sheer enjoyment but this post speaks for itself so no need to respond haha....let me know when you turn 18 and we can have a conversation without me getting in trouble...haha

Reply

For the clueless

7:06 am on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Everyone ready to kick off the summer at Jenks this weekend. ? Starting early Friday morning the cold beer will be flowing at my house. Make sure you park and chirp your car alarm for the squeaky wheel folks of d4.

Reply

CindyLu

12:15 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

Now they are all parking in d3. They will be complaining real soon. That is the reason why d3 is against the parking plan. I say let them have all the problems that d4 has been dealing with for a while. They will be whining and demand changes because now the tourist will be affecting them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

3:39 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

Let them elect a mayor and council that live in THEIR district then they can get what they want too.

Mike Corbally

6:05 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

I really don't know what your point is? You have 3 Councilmen in your district and soon their will be 2 Council people in District 1. That leaves 2 in District 4. Under your small minded approach District 3 is the lonely area. Grow up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

11:47 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

Grow up? Nice response to a voter and taxpayer. You seem to already know that there are THREE other districts in town, when was the last time you drove or walked through them with your eyes open? I have tried to be polite and respectful to you elected "officials" and suggest you look around, THAT has NOT worked very well now, has it? The problems that I have been complaining about for FIFTEEN YEARS have gotten worse and your response is GROW UP??? I think it's time to clean house at 416 New Jersey Ave. and put in people who will serve the ENTIRE town!

Better Living

7:27 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

JFYI- ...a reliable source, who attended the concert, said people were "hammered" and drunk on the beach at 6:00AM. Some admitted to sleeping on the beach since 3:00AM

Reply

Better Living

11:11 pm on Monday, May 28, 2012

70 arrests in Seaside Heights in one day?
Is PPB next?

Reply

JohnnyT

12:04 am on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Yes it can...with ease too. It is going in that direction. Unfortunately many are in denial on what is going on in their own town. The line getting in to Martel's at 1 in the afternoon today was very long at $15 to get in.. that is why there is no need to go beyond the 12 closing. Drinking that long is enough. The Reid/Cortes republicans who are running for council has the mentality let the boardwalk do what ever they want for the "money" $800,000 concession from the boardwalk. The money is just not worth the town going down real quick. I do not know where the boardwalk is advertising? But it has to be somewhere. We always had tourist coming here but not at this extent. We are a small town and we can only fit so many in at one time. We have way to many tourist coming at once. It is out of control and it is only a matter of time until something happens. I feel we just can't handle the crowds at this level. I seen a lot of extra police walking around in the street and they are even overwhelmed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ruth Liss

8:31 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

JohnnyT, I thought that was you I saw standing in line at Martell's. I was going to say hello but I was too far in the back of the line and didn't want to lose my spot. I didn't mind waiting in line though. It was a beautiful day. Were you able to get in?

Better Living

1:20 am on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Reid...has, lets say, a VESTED interest in BW!
..thumbs down when time comes to vote for him
.
Cortez, not too sure about him, but if he is w Reid...that alone says a lot!

Reply

JohnnyT

7:11 am on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

I fine the post really funny that claim the drinkers will just start earlier do to bar closing at 12...Newsflash they already start early.

Reply

Mr. Happy

9:05 am on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

I think Beachknave may be right on this one. Time to change the roster at Jersey Ave. and this is the year to do it. Replace Lurie and Reid with Loder and Cadalzo.
Then we'll have one (R), one (D) and four (I). Perfect blend. Get out the vote!

Reply

Better Living

9:13 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

171 citations written in PPB this past weekend....great revenue for the town, but is that what we want PPB to be known for?
....it's only going to get worse.

Reply

Stephen Schneider

11:40 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

I was out on my bike on Saturday and Sunday night for the bar closings, riding around both district 4 with a couple loops through 3. From my experience, these are the two busiest nights of the year for the BW bars, so this should have been worse case scenario. Although I quite obviously do not know most of the people who are posting here, I must say that I don’t think I could identify any residents (other than seeing Andy Cortes on Sunday night doing the same) out taking a look for themselves in order to assess the effectiveness of the increase in the police patrols. Please forgive me if you were out and about. Granted, this is surely not your responsibility to so, but I did find my firsthand account to be informative enough to validate a post here

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen Schneider

11:41 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Here are a couple things that I noticed primarily in the residential district 4 area west of Ocean Ave:
-The police patrols were everywhere on Arnold, Central, Parkway, Niblick and the related cross-streets down to Baltimore Ave. Patrols and bike cops also penetrated further into the 200 and 300 blocks.
-People were, for the most part, well behaved, speaking in low voices and very aware that abusive behavior was not going to be tolerated. I heard several people say “there’s another one”, referring to me as a bike cop of sorts I suppose. That part was entertaining.
-There were some louder voices and laughter, but it was the clear minority of the group and they responded well to a simple shush!!
-The streets with restricted parking signs (Niblick and Central) were still being heavily used. There were many NY plates and very few open parking spots after midnight. I don’t know if people knew that the new law was not being enforced yet, did not see the signs or just ignored them, but the spots were full.
-The patrols seemed to stop and punish anyone who crossed the line or even came close to being abusive and disruptive.

Comment_arrow

Stephen Schneider

11:42 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

-The highest volumes of noise that I heard were from house parties scattered through-out district 3 and 4, including the house next to where I live.
-The 300 and 400 blocks were very quiet with only occasional groups of people walking to their cars.
-I spoke with a few of the officers on patrol in the neighborhood, and they were also surprised at how quiet it was.

Comment_arrow

Stephen Schneider

11:48 pm on Tuesday, May 29, 2012

In my opinion, the increase in enforcement is taking root again after a few years of neglect and lack of man-power. I think it is a no-brainer that there will be more tickets written this year than last simply due to the fact that there were police officers present this year to catch people and punish them. They will go home and tell their friends their stories, just as they did last year. However, this time, their story will be about a night in jail or a $300 fine. They will most likely not return next weekend with their friends and take it to the next level as they did last year when events spiraled out of control in the early hours of the morning. Please keep in mind, I only observed the hours between around midnight and 3am, so I don’t know what went on during the day, and wouldn’t be presumptive enough to comment having not seen it for myself.

oingo boingo

7:58 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Stephen-thank you for your non bias assessment of the past weekend. I agree with you about more enforcement ends this whole fiasco that Barrella and company have created. Alot of the vandalism that goes on in this town is caused by local kids who have no direction from home. (i.e.graffiti, breaking bottles, fights, drinking at end of cedar ave, etc ) It's a real shame the boardwalk businesses have become the scapegoat for the town malcontents listening to team Barrella. Kudos to Andy and you for patrolling and finding out what really goes on. As you also mentioned the groups rentals are the biggest problem when it comes to noise and drunks but for some strange reason those who rent to these individuals constantly get a free pass. I think V Rudd should get her dust pan and broom and keep quiet with her tax reduction.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Resident

8:50 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Vanessa Albert-Rudd.....please feel free to leave this godforsaken TOWN. You won't be missed by many.

Comment_arrow

M Brodeur

11:28 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

My guess is that "A Resident" does not know Mrs. Rudd at all.

Mr. Happy

8:28 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

We all appreciate Mr. Schneider's report from the weekend. And the officers he encountered who said they were surprised how quiet it was. That must have been from the DMZ, because there were not 171 citations as reported by Better Living.
There were 179. 80 of those for drinking in public. 40 for urinating in public. Oh, and 46 criminal arrests. Keep in mind, these are just the people the police caught. Multiply that for the actual numbers. A quiet weekend? We report, you decide.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Resident

8:51 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Funny how Mr. Happy has such precise numbers on what the written citations for the weekend were....

Comment_arrow

Spooner

10:42 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mr Happy: what does Agent Orange have to do with Point Pleasant. . .You do remember your post yesterday. . .Don't want to have you get off topic. . .but could you respond. . . Oh listen we've moved onto smoking. . . maybe you can jump to nuclear for the next topic?

oingo boingo

8:50 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mr notHappy- how many of those violations came from the bars on the boards? Love to hear that fig. Vrudd - many of us love this "god forsaken town" just the way it is so if it's so bad move to bay head or sea girt.

Reply

Stephen Schneider

9:03 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mr. Happy: Do you have the weekend statistics for the hours of 12am and 3am in the residential areas west of Ocean Avenue in order to apply an “apples to apples” comparison? I don’t think that it is quite fair to apply town-wide crime statistics for Memorial Day Weekend to my observations. I would be very interested to see those numbers. Thank you in advance.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Happy

9:31 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mr. Schneider- I appreciate you touring D4, I really do. But I have to ask you if you live in D4? If you do not, a tour of the area gives just a glimpse of reality here.
I do not have further breakdown on stats but I don't think that 225 total violations, regardless of where they occur, will console anyone, anywhere in town.

Comment_arrow

Stephen Schneider

9:54 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Thank you Mr. Happy, and again, this is only my opinion.
I have lived in and dealt with the summer crowds in D4 for over 15 years, which is a primary reason why I wanted to take to the streets to see for myself. In turn, I was compelled to post what I had seen. In all fairness, the planned police approach was to have zero-tolerance with a small army on staff this weekend, which also led to the high number of violations. The objective is let people know that if they plan on being abusive on their vacation time, the Summer of 2012, 2013, 2014, and so on, in PPB is not for them and hopefully the number of violations decreases as the summer goes forward, and not the opposite such as last year. It was a very effective image that the town carried in the past and will take some work to restore.

Mr. Happy

9:12 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

To:
A Resident- It's a public record.
To:
Oingo-if you are saying that most of these violations are not BW related, why does the BW accept culpability by offering 800K for police services? Even they admit the problems stem mainly from the BW, you can stop defending them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Full Timer

11:28 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mr. Happy, while you statistics are quire accurate, I am sure, you yourself may have to admit that the citations for drinking in public , most likely, did not result from the boardwalk or any clubs in town since patrons are not permitted to leave with drinks. This policy is stringently enforced, not only by club security but, by the police outside the clubs. Can you also be certain that the criminal arrests were related to the boardwalk clubs? You would need the arrest records to determine that, wouldn't you? Incidentally, the only police activity on my block in D4 occurred between 7 and 8 PM on Saturday. One involved a rental home and the other a large group of people returning from the beach (or bar) and changing in their vehicles. Neither one of these incidents would have been prevented by the newer ordinances. As always, I welcome your intelligent reply. Thanks.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

3:16 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Full Timer- been raising this point, especially after Councilman Gordon stated that 42% of all citations/arrests occur between 12-3AM. Council or PD don't give 'patch' all the data?

oingo boingo

9:38 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Vrudd - your true colors are shining bright on your agenda. People like Steve S are trying to become part of the solution and give people hard facts and all you and happy do is spew venom. You both started your political attack at 9:05 and 9:30 yesterday morning. Attacking Tim Lurie and Steven Reid while happy totes his political landscape for the dais next year. And don't tell me about low class because I've seen you in action. If you want me to elaborate I'd be glad to. And Happy, the only reason the boardwalk is offering 800k is because the 4 bloc members are extorting it out of them with their soon to be illegal ordinances.I wonder how you and Vrudd are going to feel when a certain councilman changes his mind and votes to take the 800k and leaves the bars open till 2am. It's gonna happen just watch.

Reply

oingo boingo

10:18 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mr Happy - I think your tunnel vision on blaming the boardwalk is evident. How you blame the boardwalk while this town has this working against it.

1. Gangs moving closer from Lakewood and Brick

2. NJ transits last stop with public beaches

3. Local kids becoming more disrespectful of others and others property

4.Landlords renting to anyone who will pay their price (underaged, rowdies,Jersey Shore show types )

Reply

oingo boingo

10:49 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Vrudd - o.k. thank you for clearing that up. If you would like to continue constructive dialogue I'm game. Didn't the people in this town vote last year for no parking plan? I understand that you voted for it but the majority didn't. It is really a shame that someone broke glass on your walkway but that is today's society. That can happen if people park in front of your house or not. People leave diapers and all kinds of garbage in front of my house. Once I saw a mother pull out a portable toilet for her child and after the child went to the bathroom the mother emptied it in my neighbors shrubs. My point is these are enforcement issues because you can't shut down the entire town. Reid,Lurie (and Mayer ) all wanted to take the money for more enforcement. The parking plan is going to be a complete disaster. Can't enforce on county roads and there is not enough manpower.

Reply

oingo boingo

10:55 am on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

One other thing Vrudd - you have people in this town who have "not in my backyard attitudes ". Just look at what cindy lu under one of these threads. She wrote that the people who live in d3 need to start going through what the people in d4 go through and should basically feel your pain. Really? That's the friendly attitude that is being taught? This town needs to stop the division but it might be to late. Certain people thrive off the negativity.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CindyLu

7:33 am on Sunday, June 3, 2012

I am a "He not a "She... I just happen to like the name. Stop the Bull-sh-t oingo boingo. It is not negativity it is reality. Each district residents, each council member, employee's of the bars, employee's of the town ARE only worried about THEMSELVES. That is the way the world works. Everyone worries about how it is going to EFFECT THEMSELVES. Just look at some of these POST. Each group that is on attack is clearly worrying about their own AGENDAS. Yes, no one feel your pain until you are going through the same thing and it always seems to be different when it is effecting oneself.... Did you comprehend that!

Mr. Happy

12:10 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

For the record, the council passing these ordinances, will in the long run, do us all good. The good of the12AM closing is self evident. If the council compromises with the BW and accepts the donations, more police will be available; the BW gets what it wants, the town gets what it needs. The most important part though, is the parking plan. The people of D4 needed relief from overnight chaos and the parking plan provides that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Full Timer

12:33 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mr. Happy, Presuming that an agreement is reached and the bars remain open until 2AM, have you considered 1) that many of those parking in D4 who are clubbing may just choose to pay the fine and leave their cars where they are? It's not a tow away zone and people may determine that since they are already paying quite a bit for the cover and drinks to just add this to the expense for the night. If it's a group of 4 or 5, the fine could be divided, just not making it worth the effort to move. 2) What if drivers choosing to move their vehicles are already be too drunk to drive? Trying to find another space in that condition might be very dangerous. In some ways I wonder if the parking ordinance may only hurt the employees who are simply trying to earn some money and really aren't part of this feud or even some families with older children who choose to stay out until after midnight to enjoy the non-drinking venues on our boardwalk. I also replied to your earlier post in regard to the citations issued over the weekend. I eagerly wait you intelligent responses. Thank you.

Mr. Happy

1:53 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Hi Full Timer, I'll be glad to answer.
#1- I don't think I have ever heard the premise of planning on taking a parking ticket and absorbing it into the cost of the evening. Has anyone else?
#2 - I can't believe I need to answer this question. But I will answer your question with a question. If someone is too drunk to move the car at 12AM to avoid a ticket, how much drunker will they be at 2AM when they get in the car to drive home? After 2 more hours of drinking from 12-2, why do people make the point here that it is safer for the drunk who drives at 2AM than the 12AM drunk? Defies logic, doesn't it?
As to the stats, I don't have geographic breakdowns, sorry; but if you are comfortable with 225 police interventions regardless of place of occurrence, so be it.
Hope I was of help.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

3:33 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Leave the car, take a cab and return for your car after you sober up. Since the town is REQUIRING people to drive drunk I wonder if the town can be held liable for any accidents that result from their action.

Full Timer

3:36 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Thanks Mr. H for your polite reply. Honestly, there is are 2 small unlined parking spots by my home that will fit a smaller vehicle. On a number of occasions each summer, I advise people who park there that these are not spaces and they will be ticketed. Many move and thank me but others shrug there shoulders or comment that since there is no other place to park they will just pay the fine even when I advise them of the amount. Evidently, visitors WILL take the cost of a parking fine and add it into their expense. In response to your reply, which is logical and does some make sense, I agree .. that would still mean that the same drunk driver may be behind the wheel twice, regardless of how intoxicated they are. Statistically, the odds of a mishap double. Remember that a driver going home at 2AM is also (and hopefully) more likely to hit a DWI check point on a major road then someone just cruising our local streets for parking. In regard to your reply to my earlier posting, I believe you misunderstood as I didn't ask for a geographic breakdown. I was curious if you were holding the boardwalk clubs responsible for the 80 citations given to those for drinking in public since the clubs do not permit the removal of alcohol from the premises with their security backed up by local police right outside or how you could in any way be sure that any of the 40+ criminal arrests could be tied to the boardwalk clubs without actually viewing the arrest record. Thanks you.

Reply

Full Timer

4:05 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

I came up with a compromise as an alternative to the current closing ordinance. I know there are other ideas still on the table and it's not the perfect solution. I'm not posting it simply because my contact on the government side as not yet informed me of a response or if it's been presented and I have not yet had a chance to present to the Storinos. I have, however, told a few residents, full and summer, of it and the response has been very positive although somewhat doubtful that it will be accepted with both sides so "dug in". BTW, although I have only been in PPB since 1957, my parents started vacationing in town in the 1940s during the days of the Sammy Kay Band (who stayed on Central Ave.) and the other Big Bands who played the "Pavilion". Even then, the anti-tourist sentiment existed. Not to be redundant but, the brawls outside the Rip Tide Bar(which closed at 3AM on Saturdays) in the 60s and the 70s, of which I speak first-hand, sometimes required assistance by police from neighboring towns. This isn't new although certain members of the council would like to have you believe that no problems existed when Fred Martell, Orlo Jenkinson and other "original owners" were still running things. In August, 1964, with the Fours Seasons on top of the charts with "Rag Doll" a group of residents unsuccessfully tried to stop their 2 night annual performance at Martells (Fred was their close friend) because of the crowds and chaos the show would bring. Nothing new!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

5:59 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

I hate to differ, but in the 70's "Eddie and the Internationals" played at Martells (the place cleared by 12:30), The Tiki Bar was a golf course and their wasn't a bar on the Beach. The Rip Tide closed at 2AM and held about 100 people and yes it occasionally got as crazy as the crowd allowed. Jenks only got a crowd when Fresh played and maybe their was 200 people at full capacity with tables and chairs and service bars. I worked at both establishments in the 70's from bus boy, short order cook, waiter, and bartender. So now we have 4,000 party goers versus 400 at 2 AM.
The Boardwalk area was Ocean Avenue to the Beach and the bungalows on Randall Avenue where I lived. Now the Boardwalk area is east of the railroad tracks. Please folks, don't say they haven't changed since the 70's. Simply not true!

Mr. Happy

4:08 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Well, Full Timer we could debate the origin of violations all day long.
I will stand by my original statement that since the BW bars are willing to negotiate a financial agreement to help offset police costs, it is not "extortion" as the shriekers would call it, it is an industry that tacitly accepts responsibility. Enough on that.
As to parking, if you only have that one spot in front of your house, you are quite lucky. The regular streets are full, so hopefully our streets will be clear and quiet by 12, that's all we can hope for.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Full Timer

5:39 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mr. H., In regard to the citations, I am disappointed since you normally back up your posts with a solid response but I agree not to continue to debate. As far as parking, I have a corner lot with 3 legal spaces and the two above mentioned unlined spots. Unfortunately, I am becoming less and less optimistic that this closing ordinance will be resolved without, at the very least, a motion hearing and very likely, a full challenge, as I described last week, based on information provided by a superior court judge "friend" who has followed this entire debacle. As far as the "extortion" you refer to, there are many who disagree with you including myself, and I, by no means, am a "shrieker". When I was a kid, I referred to Point Pleasant as "Pleasant Point" but there has been nothing "pleasant" since these ordinances were introduced and it's NOT the tourists who are making the town unpleasant from my prospective. Thanks and have a good week and weekend.

Mr. Happy

4:21 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

TODAY'S APP EDITORIAL- If you think the problems here are going to subside, read the editorial and see your future unless something is done. I just read it, many here probably already have but failed to mention it. Calls for Pros. Office and ABC intervention to step in and take control. Read it yourself! Coming to a town near you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

6:04 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

15 years ago we were talking about becoming Seaside Heights. Now we are where they were 15 years ago. Should we take action, or wait until it's too late?

Part Timer

6:55 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Summertime at the Jersey Shore: boating, fishing, swimming, walking the beach, strolling the boardwalk and, oh yeah, early-morning brawls and melees in Seaside Heights.

Year in and year out, it’s the same thing. The bars in Seaside close down at 3 a.m., as drunken patrons pour out, looking for trouble.
Summer 2012 began the same way. Between Friday night and Monday morning, borough police made 151 arrests in the resort town, said police Detective Steve Korman.
It is time for Seaside Heights to close its bars earlier and for the state Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control to have a greater presence there to determine whether the bars are serving underage patrons and exactly how the bartenders determine when someone has had too much to drink. The bars don’t seem to have a handle on it.

Reply

Part Timer

6:55 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Also, as we have suggested in the past, Ocean County Prosecutor Marlene Lynch Ford and the county freeholder board should pressure officials there to take the steps needed to tackle the problem, starting with closing bars earlier — and, if need be, shutting some of them down altogether.
“Rumors that the police had to ‘shut down the boardwalk because of large fights’ are untrue,” Korman said. In most cases, he said, it was large crowds watching two people fighting. That’s small comfort. On a booze-filled summer night, it doesn’t take much for a crowd to turn into a liquored-up mob.

Reply

Part Timer

6:56 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

The police maintain that when the bars close, they make sure everybody leaves safely and in an orderly fashion. Really? Last summer in Seaside Heights, a series of fights broke out after a July Fourth fireworks show, resulting in 62 people being charged with disorderly conduct. Police ordered the boardwalk closed at 1 a.m. for safety reasons.
For both safety and quality-of-life reasons, Seaside Heights should shut its bars down earlier. Unless safety has taken a permanent back seat to profitability, the appropriate responses are a no-brainer.

Reply

Part Timer

6:59 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Now after reading the above who is willing to say they are against the changes coming to PPB.
And dont anybody respond with a comment about jobs, revenue and all that bull$%!^^.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

3:31 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Because YOU got yours so who cares about anybody else, right?

Comment_arrow

Spooner

11:30 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Part Timer...think your counting chickens before they hatch. . .the more your Councilman says on here...the more ammunition he gives those latin versed lawyers 'Mr Happy'...evidence... For one: why he should recluse himself when it comes to deliberations concerning the BW. . .now he admits to being a former employee. Two: he goes and makes a statement to the effect that when he was an employee(in the 70's), the BW occupancy was 400 patrons. . .now it's 4000! Yet he leaves out when all these changes took place and offers no explanation how former Council governments, their planning boards, and zoning boards of adjustment allowed all this to happen. . . and they( the present Council and himself) do not put forth the various past resolutions pertaining to all these BW expansion applications(I wonder why?) So your going to tell me that when these applications were being heard Councilman. . .not one committee member, Council member raised the issue of "expanded patron parking". . .and now umpteen years later you pass a restricted parking ordinance. . .

How many bullets do you have left to shoot your self in the foot with...

...you know they got this Supreme Court decision called Miranda vs. Arizona. . .most people know it as your "Miranda rights" I guess you feel you don't need it?

Spooner

7:00 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Mike... what is your idea of taking action. . .close the bars at midnight with a caveat of money and occupancy deductibles to stay open later. . .Lets see: promote government shake downs(Al Capone style) or it the Boss Tweed way...with corruption. . .Just trying to figure out at this stage who your audience still is...that believes all your BS? Yous people are a joke..with all your double talk!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

12:09 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Spooner, add to your list my brother and sister worked for Orlo Jenkinson in the 60's and my parents saw The Four Seasons at Martells Sea Breeze. The Supreme Court should be provided all the info they need by the PI's that have done a thorough search of my life over the last 2 years. I'm an open book.

Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

2:08 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Nice character assassination mailer I just received and threw in the trash.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

2:51 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Mr Corbally: has much as you chide Reid for his connections to the Storinos'. . .your no better than him? With your apparent arrogance, you take pride in all these smoking guns. Unfortunately that world. . .or your world doesn't encompass the Superior Court...much less the Court of Public Opinion. You cannot render any decision with all this baggage as unbiased. .when it comes to the BW. . .But look you carry on as 'Mr Happy' would say. . .Hopefully he won't come out of retirement?? Oh I remember..two question marks were is limit. . .

Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

3:36 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Spooner, Working for the BW in the 70's when I was 14 to 19 is a far cry from Reid's major campaign contributors being the liquor and real estate lobbies. I will gladly go blow for blow in court. Doing lobbyist work for one of the largest night club establishments isn't a conflict? Being personal friends isn't a conflict? Being paid to go to court as an expert witness isn't a conflict? Working with the state to change CAFRA rules for a particular individual isn't a conflict? I guess the judge will decide!

Comment_arrow

Spooner

9:11 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Mr Corbally- with all those rentals you have listed on your Barefoot Real Estate site. . . you don't think Ron Gasidrowski April 16, 2012 letter doesn't address that. . .and I won't even begin to get into the SMS(?) purchase of Jenkinsons, when you might have been working there in 1977. You would have been...what 18-19 years old. . . Jenkinsons was going through some pretty rough times back then trying to make a go of the business. . .

http://starnewsgroup.com/weekly/2012/04.26.12/pdf/gasiorowski__04.26.12_75459.pdf

Part Timer

7:02 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

I also wonder why the Patch has not published the story being that it is exactly what we are about to go through. Very strange...

Reply

Mr. Happy

7:10 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Full Timer- it has been great debating with you, but Mr. Happy will now take a much needed and dare I say, well deserved rest. Nothing I say from this point on will carry the weight of the Star Ledger and AP Press agreeing with a 12 AM closing. When you add today's AP Press editorial calling for, in fact demanding, county and state intervention into the issues of Seaside Heights, up to and including shut downs of the bars; well, simply put, the die is cast for PPB. Unless our elected officials are successful in their attempt to bring OUR situation under control, there will be outside intervention. Seaside will serve as the template and any challenges from the PPB BW will be measured against our unfortunate brothers to the south. The parallels are unmistakable and no court will miss them. I will be back, as the need arises, but for now the path is clear and this debate is over.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Full Timer

9:50 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Ditto Mr. H., Although I don't agree with you often, I will admit that you comments are informative, to the point, and thought provoking. I hope you enjoy your rest and hopefully your summer, regardless of the final outcome.

Full Timer

10:45 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Hi Mike, Our memories of the 70s seem to differ and I presume that you were not in the beach or old enough to remember the 60s and that's fine. Most of us tend to remember the past in a way that supports the current cause we believe in. I did enjoy the old Martells Mini Golf Course Thanks for the reminder and for your reply.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

3:44 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

The coolest golf hole was the 18th on the Jenks Course, over the grass, where the Aquarium now stands.

Full Timer

8:41 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Mike, I was going to mention Jenks "Little Golf Course" last night. I won (and lost) many a free game on that 18th Hole. We evidently agree on the old mini golf courses and some PPB's past. I wish we weren't apart on some the current issues. I remember when you, Tim L. Dan D. and Mike D. were all on the same side and I supported you all but that's politics. Have a nice weekend.

Reply

Mike Corbally

9:35 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Mr Spoon,
It would be entertaining.

Reply

Full Timer

10:56 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

Mike C., Orlo Jenkinson and his family were top notch people. I remember him walking into that little old arcade on the west side of the boardwalk and popping 5 extra games onto the baseball game I was playing.Initially, I was sad when he and Alice sold to Pat in 1976. By then I had done a couple years working for them as well. I last saw Orlo in 1980, I believe, and he surprised me by saying he wished he had held on for a few more years. Off hand I don't remember the year he died, but it wasn't many after that. Since the purchase, the Storinos have done a terrific job that they just don't seem to get the recognition for. They are wonderful employers and members of our community. The Boro has been very fortunate to have two excellent owners over the past 86 years. If this battle lines continue to be drawn, we might not be as fortunate the third time around. It appears that you and I have similar backgrounds and a devotion to the town which is why it so perplexes me how different your current perspective is. Consider a post you made the other day ..that "Point Pleasant Beach is Seaside 15 Years Ago". While I understand your attempt to draw parallels about where you believe the the boro is headed, such a comment could easily discourage the family clientele that you so eagerly desire when one of the town's leading officials compares it to Seaside Heights. It's a "scare technique" that can do more harm than good. Again, have a nice weekend.

Reply

Mike Corbally

11:20 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012

I have watched the change over the last 15 years. We should be scared. Anyone who walks Jenkinson's Boardwalk during the Summer and doesn't see the negative spiral has blinders on. They are great business men that have attracted a new clientele that only benefits them. I don't even believe they knew this would happen, but they created it. They couldn't get enough of a good thing and no one said stop to their expansions. Its time we take our collective heads out of the sand. The people who live near the BW are living in chaos. Look at the police report. You have a great weekend also.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Resident

9:07 am on Friday, June 1, 2012

"Anyone who walks Jenkinson's Boardwalk "

Ya know, I realize you are just a councilman and I should set my expectations too high....but even you should know....it's NOT Jenkinson's Boardwalk. The town of PPB owns the boardwalk. Jenkinson's is just a part of the the Point Pleasant Beach boardwalk.

Comment_arrow

A Resident

9:07 am on Friday, June 1, 2012

sorry, that should say... I should NOT set my expectations too high.

Ruth Liss

7:13 am on Friday, June 1, 2012

@Mike C
If you take a serious look you will see that our entire society has changed. Things aren't what they were 15 years ago. You can not fault any businesses for this change. Put the blame where it belongs on the individuals themselves. Let our police officers continue to do the job that they do so well. They are sending a zero tolerance policy to anyone who violates the law. Isn't this what everyone wants. You will most likely see a rise in the police reports. Thats because the police officers are doing their job, and a great one too! Things usually appear worse, before they get better.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

12:11 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012

Ruth, I hope you are right.

Mike Corbally

9:49 am on Friday, June 1, 2012

It says Jenkinsons boardwalk. They advertise it as Jenkinsons Boardwalk. Maybe they owe a licensing fee?

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Resident

12:29 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012

They, are a business that has their own marketing.

You, are a councilman and should know the difference.

Again, maybe I just expect too much.

Full Timer

10:16 am on Friday, June 1, 2012

Mike C. I live one block in from Ocean Ave. and while I will concede that the clientele has changed over the past 15 years, I hardly agree that I am living in Chaos. There are more people, and there is more noise, and a little more disrespect, at times yes, but certainly not chaos. Consider this please... If things are really as dismal as the scenario that you appear to be painting, how much of an impact will a parking ordinance and closing the clubs two hours earlier really have? How will this resolve some of the "gang related" issues that we had last summer that had nothing to do with the clubs? Crime and related problems, and an overall drop in "civility" have increased all over NJ not just in Point Pleasant Beach. It seems that the only real solution to the problem, as you portray it, would be to turn the borough into a "gated community" or to keep all the bridges that lead into town in the "up position" from Memorial Day through Labor Day, both which we know are unrealistic. I applaud you in your desire to make Point Pleasant Beach a better place to live and vacation! I simply don't see the current solutions as being the best way to achieve your goal. I believe that I have said all that can be said, at least for now. Have a good summer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Resident

12:31 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012

Being that the area near the boardwalk is in chaos...I guess the rentals for the area are all empty? After all, who would want to rent in chaos....

Might have to stop in Corbally's rental place and see how they advertise rentals in that area....might be fun.

Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

12:40 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012

No family seasonal rentals. Less and less families want to bring their kids here for weekly rentals. It shouldn't surprise anyone. My neighbors don't take their grandkids to "our" Boardwalk any more. Look at the streets where the arrests are. Would you let your kids out on those streets by themselves? I'm thankful my kids are grown.

Spooner

11:46 am on Friday, June 1, 2012

Mayor- your OS letter...talk about twist and spin?. . .there's not one line in their editorial that mentions the numerical destinations of those bar ordinances. . .Quite frankly when you read it. . .there confused with the several amendments themselves?

...you said that OS calls it "a bad" thing to cut off alcohol consumption at 12AM. . and that they called your ordinances "illegal". They used no such words? They gave their opinion as to what reasonably in their estimation could happen after 12AM with bar patrons getting into their cars under the influence and going to other nearby towns. . . and that your ordinance would possibly be challenged in Court. . .

...you have a problem with them questioning your fees to stay open. . .how would that address quality of life and safety. . .you don't think that they the Ocean Star should raise those issues. . .Why then do you back track there in your letter?

...you don't think it's reasonable for the OS to raise the point of "litigation costs" if other parties join in to challenge the town's ordinances. . .again you back track and play footsie there as well. . .So whom are you writing this letter too...or should I say for what purpose. . .

Reply
Comment_arrow

TommyG

1:06 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

All the letters that are put in the O.S..................... are twists and spins. I can't believe the letter that Bill Mayer wrote supporting Mr. Reid who did not even support or understand Mayer's budget . How is Reid going to be the best choice of support for the residents of this town? If he can't even comprehend or understand how a budget works. Bill should have thought twice before supporting someone with so little knowledge of what is going on. It is not making himself look to good with that letter of support. Clearly as he stated there is a problem between him and Mr. Loder which is fine... but don't tell the residents that Reid has an understanding. Because clearly he does not. Everyone is going to support their own including the OS. It is whoever is in their pocket. Naturally the O.S. and 101.5 is a big BW supporter being they spend lots of money in Advertisement so they are going to side with the BW. I think many of the council members are forgetting that they should be representing the residents who VOTE THEM ALL IN. Not just the businesses as apparently they wind up doing. Leaving the residents holding the bag to many times. Bill is right, Point Pleasant Beach is in the tourism business. That does not mean the residents are in business with them too. Why should the residents have to pay for them. We did not sign up to pay for them too. No one states when you buy a house in the beach that we are in the tourism business and is going to pay extra for services.

Mr. Happy

4:10 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012

Well folks, I said I would come back when I was needed. So here I am!
My man Spooner says that Corbally should "recluse" himself from voting due to conflict. A recluse is............well, look it up. Face it son, you're out of your league.
As to the question of who should recuse themselves from voting on matters involving the BW? It would be laughable if it wasn't scandalous. How many direct links must we see between Reid and the BW? The very latest? Reid at Jenk's for the summer blast off concert. In the owner's private box. As usual, we report, you decide.

Reply

Spooner

9:27 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012

Slappy- you got to get yourself educated to the law. . .which apparently you and Corbally like wave off with a fly swatter...

http://starnewsgroup.com/weekly/2012/04.26.12/pdf/gasiorowski__04.26.12_75459.pdf

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Happy

9:33 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Hi Spooner- this is the last incomprehensible statement you will have to make.
A copy of Rosetta Stone, the English version is on the way!

Comment_arrow

Spooner

11:38 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Happy- I'll past the Stone to Trenton. They'll rewrite the law for Mike and you? The two of yous are in a state of denial. . .Hopefully Councilman Gordon has more sense. . .and puts an end to all this?

You(Corbally) put a parking plan in effect that only 23% of registered residents in District 4 voted for. You put a parking plan in effect that the town voted down in a referendum last year. Three of the four Council members who voted for the District 4 Parking Ordinance live there. . .talk about self-serving! And to put the icing on the cake: why didn't Councilman Corbally recuse himself for the reasons stated in the Gasiorowski letter?

So keep up the tangent remarks...but I know if Barrella is reading this, and unlike you. . .as a lawyer he can't be that stupid. . .

Ruth Liss

7:46 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

@Mike C. Perhaps the economy is a major factor in the decline of seasonal/weekly rentals here in PPB. Is it that less families want to vacation here or simply can't afford to. How much do seasonal/weekly rentals go for?

Reply

Mike Corbally

8:56 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Ruth, I don't know if weekly family rentals are down or not this over last. I personally don't have anything to compare too. I know all of the seasonals I saw were groups not families. I know my friends and neighbor don't bring their kids and grandkids to our boardwalk. Would you want kids to see the sort of behavior that went on last week East of the tracks? Look at the streets where the arrests took place. It is spreading. Kick in paying between $1000 and $4000 for that show?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ruth Liss

9:30 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Mike, I thought since you were in the real estate business that you might have some statistics to compare previous years rentals with this year. Do you mostly rent to groups? If so, how is business this year. I did see where the arrests took place. The majority of them occured before 12a.m. Our police officers are doing a great job! Let them continue to do so. Do you only want a parking plan and for the bars to close at midnight, or do you want to shut down the entire BW?

Comment_arrow

A Resident

10:35 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Mike Corbally, on June 1 you state "Less and less families want to bring their kids here for weekly rentals." Yet, here on June 2 you state "I don't know if weekly family rentals are down or not this over last. I personally don't have anything to compare too"

Which is it? Do you remember what you yourself are saying?

Comment_arrow

Spooner

12:04 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Ruth: you might try the zillow.com website. Currently there are 40 rentals listed, varying from 8 days to 475 days on the market, with various rental prices up to $30,000 a month. No data of what was rented.

http://www.zillow.com/homes/08742_rb/#/homes/for_rent/Point-Pleasant-Beach-NJ-08742/61165_rid/40.112542,-73.953867,40.049497,-74.170504_rect/12_zm/

Mike Corbally

9:51 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

No, we mostly sell houses and we are very good at it. Last weekend none of our rentals received a write up. Midnight bar closings for a year or so I believe would help.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

4:01 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Help put people out of work? Help damage or even destroy some businesses in town and not just on the BW? Sure, this bone headed idea will be a BIG help. It certainly helped ME decide which buttons to push in November.

Mike Corbally

10:58 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

A Resident,
If you are a resident you would know family rentals have been going down for years. Point Pleasant Beach was a place the same family would come vacation year after year. I don't see that anymore. The agency I'm part of has no rental history to compare. I do see more seasonal rentals drifting to the south end of town, and they never had seasonal rentals.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Resident

12:29 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Mike Corbally, if you had been paying attention for the last decade, you would have noticed that many of the south end of town homes were sold by those that grew up and lived here. The owners of lots of those houses bought them for...wait for it....rental opportunities. Look in the tax records for the current owners....most of them are from up North. It's really a simple explanation of the increased rentals there.

Are there less family rentals overall? Yes....all over NJ. Why? Worse economy, lots of people out of work or at lesser jobs, and very increased rental prices. 3 simple, obvious reasons...NOT related to the boardwalk.

There's a pretty fair amount of articles in national/statewide papers about people's vacation choices. You'll see the 3 reasons above listed...NOT boardwalk problems.

Mr. Happy

4:21 pm on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Continuing on the Reid/BW connection, does anyone wonder who paid for those slick campaign mailers? I doubt the sad remnants of the Rep. Club's few members could raise the money to fund these mailers. Speaking of the mailers, one mentions the mayor and Corbally dominating this year's finance committee with taxes going up. Interesting, since the finance committee was chaired by Reid's running mate Bill Mayer. It's his budget being slammed by his own running mate. Clearly it's time to purge. The first opportunity is the primary, June 5. Let's not miss it. Say no to the special interests. Vote George Loder, Column E. Residents first!

Reply

Spooner

12:46 am on Sunday, June 3, 2012

piecekeeper: don't forget his shellacking in 2004, when he ran against Corbally...losing by over 500 votes(906 to 1458) Then in 2010 he lost again running as a Republican insurgent against Tooker. . .now Corbally and Tooker are supporting him. . .Ah does politics make. . .for strange bed fellows?

PS: a vote for Loder does not reflect the town's split agenda. . .when less than half voted for Barrella last year? Now don't everyone laugh at once...especially you 'Mr Happy'!

Reply
Comment_arrow

CindyLu

8:27 am on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Keeping on attacking boys as Loder signs have been popping up all over town. Sure Loder has admitted to his problems in his past. Apparently he has grown up and YOU fellas have not. Keep it up boys, you are actually helping the situation. Individuals in town are not liking personal attacks on past mistakes that everyone has. Suddenly changing your support happens all the time in big time politics so nothing is different in a smaller town. It does not matter how many votes Barrella received. What matter is that he won twice... You can split it, slice it, dice it, throw more in the ring and he still becomes the winner... So Thanks Boys!! We appreciate all your support. The former Republican Club has ruined this town. Now the New Republican Club is following in their footsteps. What an embarrassment and problems they have caused this town. The reason so many broke off from them and now chooses to run under an independent. I love all the Reid political literature that has been going out... all their fancy colorful glossy lies. I wonder who is paying for all that. Certain special interest groups want Reid to win. I would to when they know he is going to vote their way. We go from one "bloc" to another. Who is paying for all this new colorful literature? Love the past and future signs that all they do is bring up the past that they can't even get right. Individuals are going to support who they want and thrive on the negativity of who they don't want.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

1:10 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

CindyLu- the bottom line to George Loder today...is what was printed about two years ago on page 9 in the June 4, 2010 edition of the Ocean Star for the June 8th Primary, when he was running as part of your New Republican Club. There the full page add attacked Republican Councilman Dyer, but not Republicans Tooker, Cervino, or Loder who unlike Dyer were all running for the Republican line that November.

Just one month ago Loder reported to ELEC that he had collected $50 for his campaign. . .now your telling us that he has signs. . .where did the money come from? Like I said: George Loder is about that group who paid for that one page add back in 2010 threatening that dire things would happen to Point Pleasant Beach in 2011. . .The ad said: "The Point Pleasant Beach You Know And Love In 2010, Won't Resemble The One You Will Come To Know 2011". . .they must of had a crystal ball!

So why do you people allow them to get away with this?

Mr. Happy

8:43 am on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Character: overcoming past mistakes, becoming a solid citizen, running for office to do what is best for the town--George Loder.
A Character--Blatant ties to special interest with a shameful voting record that confirms that fact, "appointed" to council after 2 defeats, admits to not reading the budget, then votes no, etc., etc.,etc.--Reid.
We report, you vote.

Reply

PennyStocks

9:23 am on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Hey Andy we all know you're on here. Yes or no. Were you a guest in the VIP area at Jenk's for the Friday morning kickoff

How about your running mate

Reply
Comment_arrow

CindyLu

9:42 am on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Most of the republicans from the republican club both past and present or those who are connected are on here starting trouble as usual. They are still upset that they keep on losing. Not many believe the lies and nonsense they spew. They are seeing the truth first hand and the reason they have been losing the battle. I am sure he was a guest. Anyone that is or trying to become a BW supporter reaps benefits in some way. That is how it works in this town. You will become rewarded in one way or another. Andy Cortez is a repeat of Jeff Dyer.... I am sure Andy is trying to set himself up for a good position or job.

Comment_arrow

Better Living

7:39 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

@ Penny and Cindy
I agree getting their pockets lined one way or another....
Vote for Loder!

Comment_arrow

Mr. Happy

8:21 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Hi Penny-Andy will plead the 5th or just blame Reid for this massive error in judgement. They were certainly there in the Jenk's private box, hence no denials.
Remember this on primary day. Votes for Reid/Cortes are votes for the BW, there is no doubt.

CindyLu

9:25 am on Sunday, June 3, 2012

piecekeeper, Do you know when Loder received his DUI's? What were the years in which his mistakes were made? Apparently you know about everyone's personal life. RESIDENTS that have signs on their lawn knows all about Loder's past and still choose to put them up. Low life's in this town will not let it go. Maybe Reid's, Cortez's and Caldazo personal life should be investigated too. I am sure they have made mistakes in their past too. It has nothing to do with the boardwalk's successful owners. Like the spinning though. You must be related or connected to Spooner the Looner. Again, I am responding to other posts. I have stated everyone is negative on who they don't want and that is fact. It has nothing to do with being a hypocrite. The reality is. Everyone is not being truthful most of the time, are known to talk behind your back and yes being a hypocrite on different issues going on in town. Apparently it is the way of today's world.

Reply

Mike Corbally

12:20 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

That was one of many mistakes I made. It was wrong then and is wrong now. That's why I have chosen not to be part of a local political party. Negative campaigning works but I don't have to be part of it anymore. I've grown up a little too over the last 10 years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

1:23 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

...piecemaker: I just got up off the floor reading that Corbally liner. . .what's next. . .Penance!

Mr. Happy

2:06 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Spooner/peacekeeper:Titile 39 is where you find the statute for DUI.
Title 39 is where the MOTOR VEHICLE laws are found.
I'll even tell you where it is-- 39:4-50.
Serious yes, but let's not keep labeling it a crime. I know ignorance is bliss, but you now take it to new levels.
Again, you're out of your league son.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Really??

7:59 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Seems it wasn't that long ago when the PPB Republican Club (as well as most other Rep. Clubs) fully endorsed a candidate who was an admitted alcoholic and had a history of DUI. How soon they forget. The years were 2000 and 2004. The candidate...George W. Bush.

Comment_arrow

Really??

9:26 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

@ piecekeeper.... Gore, Kerry and then Obama..... Or was it McLame?

Mr. Happy

3:19 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Mike Corbally-you need only answer Spooner OR piecekeeper. They are the same.
It's comical when you look at the attempt to create 2 different bloggers from one inept person. Re-read what "both" have written and you'll see how obvious it is.
C.mon, Spooner, work on it! Be more creative! And correct yourself and tell everyone where you found statute 39:4-50.

Reply

Spooner

4:38 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

piecemaker- if you have access to Ocean Star read the Point Pleasant Beach PBA ad they put in the June 4, 2010 edition just before the June 8th primary threatening town with either coming up with more money for police...or else. . .Slappy/ Happy wants you to talk about his nonsense. . . so you don't talk about Loder's character, whom he supports. . .It's all a sham. All/most of those so called quality of lifers(Cavagnaro, Tooker, etc) want to squeeze more money out of businesses; if not just out and out get rid of them, to pay for the ever growing cost of personnel. . . And what's insulting: is that they agreed to give them money last year(40K) and wow the amount this year($160K). . .and there still not satisfied. . .go figure it?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

11:13 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

piecekeeper- can't prove it...but look at the facts: two months before that June 3, 2010 ad...on April 1st, you had one long time police chief...and two months after that ad you had his lieutenant on Aug 1st(two key police personnel) both retire right in the middle of PBA war with the town over health benefits. . .where the PBA sued the municipality. . .sicking it to Dyer as they stated in the ad...and the others on Council. . . Each of them either by design or happenstance contributed in part to what the PBA stated in that ad . . that would be fall the town in 2011?

PS: who is Susan Hrin-Loder, 2010 Campaign Treasurer For Committee To Keep Mayor Barrella, 116 Niblick Street on page 13 in Ocean Star's Oct 29, 2010 edition. . .Is this what Mike Corbally refers to as Loder's volunteer work?

P C

7:56 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

So let me get this straight. From everything I'm reading on this board, Loder is a drunk. So does that mean he's in the BW's pocket? If all the drinking related issues in town are caused by the bw bars, why is the bloc be endorsing him? I think he'd want the bars open 24/7.

Reply

Mr. Happy

9:05 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

PC-It's actually Reid in the BW pocket, it's well documented.

Peacekeeper- betweem? truely? You're still at 100%. The dumbing down of Patch continues!! Spooner has trained you well.

Reply

Better Living

10:41 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

Reid is/was a plant by the BW.
Vote for Loder!
Tooker, Corbally, Gordon, Barrella not on BW "payroll"
Reid, Maher, Cortez and Lurie..."buddies, friends,...ALL have, OR will have a vested interest in BW"
Again, vote for Loder!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

11:09 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

piecekeeper- just keep feeding them the facts!

Comment_arrow

Better Living

11:20 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

@piece
@spooner
Some things are just well known....
Just like who killed Jimmy Hoffa? ;)

Comment_arrow

Really??

8:05 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

If you don't think it is the type of people the boardwalk advertises to attract (i.e., creeps) you clearly have not been up to the boardwalk these hast few summers. It's like a Jerry Springer Jamboree!

Comment_arrow

Really??

9:31 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Piecekeeper..... If, as you state, NJ Transit could be blamed for all the uncivilized creeps coming to PPB I guess we don't have to worry much about drunk drivers.

Better Living

11:58 pm on Sunday, June 3, 2012

@piece
171 citations last weekend, how many more cops would you like to bring in?
25, 50,100?.....How about the National Guard? Is that what we want our town to look like?
The BW advertises and encourages undesirables to come into PPB. Until you accept that fact, you are in denial OR you have a vested interest in the BW. I am not going to rehash what I stand for. You can look it up yourself. In short, and quite simple...Quality of Life. Like I have said, I would even be willing to pay higher taxes to do so.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Better Living

6:46 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

@piece
The dirty politics you refer to. Is that a one sided statement?

Beach_N8iv

12:48 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

I just drove through The Promised Land and it got me thinking: As a resident, property owner and taxpayer in the town of Point Pleasant Beach shouldn't I have the right to park on a street that my property tax is used to maintain? Can I get a tax break for NOT being one of The Chosen Ones?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

5:46 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Beach-N8iv, As a taxpayer/resident, you may get a free pass for District IV (midnight to 6 am) by filling out a form at borough hall. You may also purchase a resident pass for $10 for those folks who chose not to live near the Boardwalk, but want to park at the meters for free. Both forms are downloadable on our web-site, and please sign up for swift 911 for emergency notifications while you are there. You have the best of all worlds.

Mr. Happy

8:49 am on Monday, June 4, 2012

The election is almost here, we have all put in our 2 cents (or less) worth, so let's just relax and have some fun with that old crowd favorite, Mr. Happy's Poll!
We are all very familiar with the postings of Spooner. He is the most prolific blogger in the history of the PPB Patch. He really loves the town, you may even say he is obsessed with PPB, which is fine for a resident of our great town. But what is so vexing is that Spooner is NOT a resident of the Beach. Why the Beach obsession, I wouldn't know, I'm not a Dr., today I'm a pollster; and the question is: Where does Spooner reside:
1. Bricktown
2. Point Boro
I'll post the results after the election, when our favorite non-resident blogger weighs in on the results from his adopted Patch town.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

5:38 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Kenya! We should get his birth certificate.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

7:54 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

piecekeeper- remind Flappy. . .that...Patch town...is called Point Pleasant. . .maybe he needs glasses too?

...and Mike: Kenya...Please!...thought you had a little more class?. . .But listen. . .you better get those Independents like Barrella out there voting tomorrow. . .Gee...that could be a conflict of interest...him registering Republican. . .Ah well, at least I tried?

Comment_arrow

Really??

8:23 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

For many years Brick Township" was referred to as "Bricktown". In fact, for a long time it was even referred to as such on local street signs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brick_Township,_New_Jersey

Better Living

8:53 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Curious what all the BW and anti-Loder fans will say when he gets voted in tomorrow?
Barrella and Corbally fixed the polls?...lol
OR finally...
concede that he was voted in, by the people, and for the people of PPB.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

9:53 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

...and he would be voted in supposedly only by registered Republicans...not all the voters?

Comment_arrow

Better Living

9:58 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

@spooner
All registered, no?
Regardless of affiliation, or am I missing something?

Comment_arrow

Spooner

10:17 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

Better Living- Loder, Cortes, Reid are running in the Republican Primary, then only registered Republicans will be permitted to vote for two Council candidates. Now if a voter is registered as an Independent, that voter can declare a party affiliation as a Republican, and he would be permitted to vote in the Republican Primary. You could end up with Reid& Loder, or Loder & Cortes, or Reid &Cortes as candidates in November? Registered Independents & Democrats can't vote in Republican Primary. Hope this answers your question?

Comment_arrow

Spooner

10:41 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

piecekeeper- No...they can do that at the polling place tomorrow, as long as it shows in the books that there's no party affiliation next to their name. Hope that doesn't upset you. . .That's why I asked if Barrella was going to become a Republican and vote for Loder. . .he's registered as an Independent. . .

Comment_arrow

Spooner

10:55 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

...oh one other point in this political gamesmanship. . .lets say Reid loses tomorrow. . .he can turn around and run as an Independent in November General election. . .then you could end up with possibly say Caldozo winning with Cortes or Loder or even Reid coming in...because now you have the entire electorate coming out to vote in a Presidential election after the summer and however that and the BW matters get or don't get resolved. . .So as they say. . .it ain't over to the fat lady sings(no gender intended)

Better Living

9:17 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

@piece
...appreciate your honesty, thats what we want.

Reply

Mr. Happy

11:04 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

The votes are in folks.....And you are correct.....Spooner resides in Point Boro.
Remember this when he attacks our town with his incessant posts.
Mike Corbally-nice to see a competent politician with a sense of humor! Kudos!

Reply

Spooner

11:59 pm on Monday, June 4, 2012

piecekeeper- a waste of time. . .Mr Flappy as usual is behind the times...or is it...the eight ball . . .Slappy/Flappy. . .we've been down this road with Barrella and Cathy Kelly here. . .but look I don't want to spoil your evening. . .we'll make it your revelation. . .just for you. . .Now does that make you happy. . .oh that's right you call yourself Mr Happy!

Slappy. . .what happens on the BW affects the lives of the people in both towns. . . now don't use too much of your intelligence to figure how that is?

PS: your getting to be a boor. . .you contribute nothing in the way of information or knowledge on issues. . .other than your personal pandering. . .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mr. Happy

7:44 am on Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Hi Spooner-sorry to burst your bubble and expose you as a blogging carpet bagger, but you really shouldn't be meddling in another town's business to the extent you do-try to focus on your own town, I'm sure they have issues too. That's all. And take your alter ego,,,,,,,,uh, I mean your friend peacekeeper with you. Thanks!

Leave a comment

 

The Point Pleasant Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks