patching...
Breaking: Bayville Man Stabbed Saturday Night in Seaside Heights Has Been Released; Suspect Still At Large »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

UPDATE: Boardwalk Confirms Turning Down 1 a.m. Bar Closing Offer

So state left to decide if midnight closing starts Sunday

 

Jenkinson's and Martell's are confirming they are turning down the town's "compromise" offer to stop serving alcohol at 1 a.m.

Council and Mayor Vincent Barrella voted narrowly on Tuesday night to offer the 1 a.m. bar closing as a compromise, after the state Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) urged the two parties to try to reach a settlement.

On Wednesday afternoon, the two largest businesses on the boardwalk released the following prepared statement (published here in its entirety):

“The payment of dollars has been inextricably linked to the hours of operation.  At each and every meeting with members of the governing body over the past five months, the demand has always been money for extended hours. 

The proposal last night was nothing more than an attempt by the mayor and the three members of council to posture a position concerning the hours of closing which has never been discussed previously. 

Jenkinson’s and Martell’s have diligently tried to resolve the issues. Numerous meetings over the past five months have proven futile. Talks have broken down. 

The Director of the ABC will render his decision by the close of business Friday.”

Marilou Halvorsen, Jenkinson's Director of Marketing, said they would not be commenting further beyond the statement.

Late Wednesday afternoon, Zach Hosseini, an ABC spokesman, said ABC had been notified that the boardwalk businesses had turned the 1 a.m. offer.

However, he said if there is to be no compromise, ABC Director Michael Halfacre will rule on the businesses' request for "a stay" on the ordinance mandating that bars throughout town stop serving alcohol by midnight.

If there is no stay, that ordinance goes into effect on Sunday.

Regardless of whether a stay is granted, a state administrative law judge will then conduct a hearing on the matter and rule whether the ordinance itself should be allowed to take effect, Hosseini said. That ruling would then be either approved or rejected by Halfacre, Hosseini said.

The businesses requested the stay so that they do not have to stop serving at midnight while waiting for a ruling on the ordinance itself.

On Tuesday night, during a break in the Point Beach Council meeting, Ed McGlynn, attorney for Jenkinson's, said he was not sure yet if the ordinance requiring bars throughout Point Beach to stop serving alcohol by midnight would mean that the bars would literally have to close their doors at that time.

He said past practice, as allowed by a council resolution from years ago, has been that Jenkinson's has been allowed to sell food and non-alcoholic beverages until 3 a.m. and then it closes. But he said he does not know if the bars would be able to, or would even choose to, continue serving food and non-alcoholic drinks past midnight, according to the new ordinance.

The ordinance says alcohol cannot be sold or consumed after midnight, but does not specifically say doors must close at midnight. When asked about that, Barrella said the ordinance doesn't mandate that doors close at midnight, but that bars may not find it economically feasible to staff their operations and keep doors open much past that time.

Related Topics: Alcohol, Bars, Closings, Martell's, Point Beach, Point Pleasant Beach, Settlement, compromise, jenkinson's, and offer

Comment_arrow

JHill

8:31 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The damage is done for Martell's and Jenks.
Not everyone is following this story closely but a lot of people have heard "don't go to Point because the bars close early."
I'm sure the boardwalk business is way down already this year.

mailman

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I heard Mayor Barrella stated that the $160k was only about $3 per household per month in new tax, as if the money from the boardwalk was no big deal to the the residents. Seems he will get his way, and can still go out and have a drink til' 2. I liked the idea of getting the money. Oh well.

Reply

bayboat

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Hey town council!
Offer 1:30 and 500k
If that doesn't work offer 1:40 and 450k
Clowns.

Reply

Buddy

1:48 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Good for them. Let the 4 Stooges come up with another plan like "take the $$$ and rescind the parking plan" Now wouldn't that be a novel idea??????

Reply

Mike Corbally

2:19 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The BW met with other business owners, hotel owners and residents last summer to come up with ideas to help solve a problem everyone admits we have. The only answer was more parking. They said the $40K last year was with no strings and asked how they could donate the money, but never wrote the check. They were billed $28K last year for “special officers” assigned to their events, and those bills are still open. They refused suggestions of earlier last calls, and promised litigation on any restrictions on their liquor licenses. They continue to market and bring in DJ’s and Bands that attract a crowd that “with their wild party scene” advertising is prone to bad behavior. Where is their compromise? Good neighbors? Last weekend their web site said the Pilot Parking Restrictions didn’t exist. Why not work with the town and promote Free Parking in the Little Silver Lot after 11PM for their customers? We made that concession and handed out nearly 500 passes for their workers. The majority of this Council won’t put a dollar figure on the quality of life of the residents. More police by itself will not solve this problem.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buddy

3:29 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mister Corbally is delusional at best with his comments above. What is he trying to justify that he and his (anti tourist) cronies on the council tried to bargin in good faith? We not that stupid sir!!!My family and I have lived in this town a lot long than you and Brooklyn Vinnie combined and have never seen this kind of childish behavior from the elected officials. Your bloc is a disgrace to this town.

Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

4:21 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Those bills are still open? STILL OPEN????? No collection action? Liens? NOTHING? OK, let's find out who's NOT doing their job and get rid of them!

Comment_arrow

Joseph Woolston Brick

8:46 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I just hate it when Jenks brings in The Nerds and all those horrible people that like 70's and 80's music riot and tear the town apart. Oh the humanity!

Spooner

3:26 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

"The only answer was more parking"...That's a solution! . . .and Mike...with you and Barrella doing your vignettes at last years April 19, 2011 Council meeting... PLEASE!

Barrella...asked Council if they would agree to accept the $40,000, with agreement that they do not have to complete applications as outlined in 5-12 (Councilman Corbally: no; Councilman Hennessy: yes; Councilman Lurie: don't know what you’re talking about – there is no offer on the table)...

...or how about this little exchange between Barrella and Lt. Dikun...

...Mayor Barrella: asked Lt. Dikun what his reaction would be if somebody, who was stopped by a Police Officer, asked to work something out outside the borough ordinances, by writing a check to Pt. Pleasant Beach (Lt. Dikun: that would not be a recommended way for a Police Officer to respond.)...

...and this is how Councilman Corbally presented the BW offer at that meeting...

...Jenkinsons refused to complete applications and offered $40,000 as a donation to the Police Department...Do I have this wrong Mike?

Meanwhile: Cavagnaro had to have been huffing and puffing. . .when he heard Corbally and Barrella describe what he later termed a "bribe" by the BW. . .Yeah there were lots of compromising going on at that meeting?

http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1207

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

10:37 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

...well Mike why don't you reprint the minutes for me from the April 19,2011 Council meeting. . .and didn't the BW attorney state to you. . . he didn't like your characterization of his client that night??

TJ

3:34 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Everyone is now looking through green color glasses!

Reply

Ken

3:47 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Both Owners of Jenks and Martells have enough money to buy the town or just close the bars down and tear down the buildings at this point. Well, maybe they should just tear down the buildings. Then watch everyone in town cry as their taxes shoot through the roof!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

3:57 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

If we allow the crime rates to continue to climb we will no longer be a desirable town to live in. If the areas around the Boardwalk all become rentals or vacant those left will be able to watch the Seaside model come to be. Take your heads out of the sand before it's too late.

Full Timer

4:17 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mike, perhaps I misunderstand you, but it now seems you are blaming the "crime rate" on the Boardwalk Clubs. If not, then why would you be posting this under the story about the Bar Closing? Your scare tactics are not what I expect of a person in your position on the council. As a former, supporter I would have to think twice the next time you are up for election.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

4:57 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I believe their is a link between the crime rate and the nightclubs and how they market their business. The number of arrests continues to rise and the majority of our police and arrests are in the Boardwalk Area. These are facts. The Council determined early bar closings will be effective in reducing the problems. This isn't about money or elections. I respect your opinion and appreciate your past support, but my only concern is the future of Point Pleasant Beach.

Comment_arrow

Clown Baby

4:48 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

It's very clear to me that Mike Corbally doesn't understand bar marketing or really much about the other towns around Pt. Beach.

TJ

4:25 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

It is all about being a Supporter? Until something is done you don't like? Perhaps there will be no one left who would want to run for election? Let's just continue to put all the cronies in on both sides. This is what you will get!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Full Timer

4:35 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Fact is I'm fed up with the Mayor and Council's antics and this entire mess they created but am just trying to post in a polite and intelligent format. In many years in PPB, I have never witnessed such incompetence as that displayed by the Barrella Camp. What I am truly thinking, about them, would not be appropriate in this forum. Leave it at that.

rocco

4:45 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

how about stopping summer rentals , cutting all public worker salaries, going to 401 k retirement plan and 35% contribution to health benefits. place all public worker jobs out for bid, lowest bid gets the job. same is done when a business wants work from the town. give it a try and lets see how low property taxes will go. and put up a $12.00 toll at the bridges and bay head.

Reply

rocco

4:51 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

jenks owners should fund their own election campaign. they are successful business men and would be able to rein in excessive public worker pay plans.. (here is the pay plan, take it or we will find someone that will) they manage a large business and would support the people and not the union shake down

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joseph Woolston Brick

8:34 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Rocco sounds like a good plan, next thing you know all the township workers will be replaced by Ukrainian " exchange students" if Jenks were in the mix.

Opinionated

5:24 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mr. Corbally, if you are so concerned about rising crime rates and quality of life, why did you (plural) cut back on the funding of Special Police Officers last year? Please don't blame it on lack of money because you could have simply raised the fines for the bad behavior of the "night crowd". Please don't tell us funds are tight while your legal bills have accumulated over the past several years (the "prayer issue" comes to mind). And we won't include what you must be paying for this and the parking fiasco. Thank you, for coming on this forum though. I may not agree with your actions but at least you had the nerve to respond.

Reply

Chief Wahoo

5:43 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The Pt. Beach Death Spiral has begun !

Reply

Mike Corbally

6:01 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

We had more "Specials" in 2011 than 2010, and more this year than last. Those are facts. The Pilot Parking Plan will pay for itself by the end of next weekend. Our insurance company has picked up the 3 current suits the BW and John Jackson et al have filed. Putting 1,000 officers on the street will help the symptom but will not solve the problem. If you live here, and property value matters to you, you should care about having a clean, tourist friendly, low crime town, with an excellent school system. If you don't intend on calling Point Pleasant Beach home for the next ten years, and you don't have small children, I wouldn't care about the downward spiral either.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HW

6:07 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Are you saying that because the borough's insurance company picked up the 3 current suits, the borough doesn't have to pay? Seriously? What is your point with that comment?

Comment_arrow

Pat Kender

12:17 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

What about the crime rate in the winter with the section 8's and the people living in the motels? doesnt that matter

Comment_arrow

paulie

9:20 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Let's see here - A clean, tourist friendly, low crime town.

He just described Manasquan.

Comment_arrow

Ray Criptkie

11:20 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Until You piss off Pat enough that he opens his 80 winter units up to sect 8, right Mike?

Better Living

6:03 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Greed!...Greed!
The BW owners turn down 1:00am bar closing.
I hope the ABC slams the door on them at 12!
BTW- if Mike Corbally's post at 2:19 on June 27th is true, the BW can not be trusted.
They offer to pay, but don't?
What makes you think they would pay the $800K?

Reply
Comment_arrow

mattmurphy

7:59 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Better Living - and you think Mike Corbally can be trusted! Remember he neglected to tell the residents about the letter he received from the county regarding the parking where you can't prohibit anyone from parking on any of the county roads.

Mike Corbally

6:17 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I believe the three law suits are frivolous. We are legally permitted to control our streets and the hours liquor can be served. These cases without our insurance company covering them will be less than the prayer suit.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

6:41 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Frivolous? Isn't that what ALL the guilty defendants say?

Comment_arrow

Ray Criptkie

11:25 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Really, You actually take advise from Gertner? He is the only one walking around with a smile on his face...all the way to the bank. And yes Mike, towns do have the right to set bar hours, but not the way you 4 clowns went about it, That my friend is extortion! And, again I will state that I reside in Dist 4, had I known about the lawsuit against the parking plan I would have gladly been a part of it, remember, we did VOTE AGAINST a parking plan, you just went ahead with it anyway!

Beach_N8iv

6:41 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Does Ms Halvorsen speak for ALL the bars in town?

Reply

MoonDogie

7:06 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I thought I read on the town-wide email that a directive was given to the council members not to discuss matters related to the pending lawsuits. Mike C. can you tell me if that excludes you?

Reply

Lifetime Local

7:27 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Let's put this into reality... Does anyone really think that there will be less problems if Jenks & Martells have to stop serving at 12am? C'mon folks... It's going to cause more problems and not with just crimes. There will be fewer rooms booked in town next year, the average single groups of men and women will be less likely to want to stay in PPB because of the hassle therefore fewer long term rentals, and on the crime side... More DWI issues due to people leaving at 12:01 AM and heading over to Manasquan or Belmar or Seaside and then coming back at three or four in the morning causing all kinds of problems and on top of that creating a more dangerous situation on the road that already exists today. The town Council efforts need to be refocused in the proper direction.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ken

12:02 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Wait, you're simultaneously arguing that people won't stay there AND that they'll leave at 12:01 am and then come back at 3 or 4 in the morning. If they're not staying, why are they coming back?

Protip: if you make renting less desirable to the hard-drinking crowd, renting will become more desirable to the family crowd.

Comment_arrow

Mimi

9:09 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I agree with Lifetime Local! I am also a "lifetime local" and believe it will make matters worse by closing at 12! I have already booked my July party in Manasquan and not PPB because of all this and it is not even in effect yet! so PPB already lost some business! The BW will survive no matter what. What about the little guy?? Frankies? The Arc? What about our kids riding home from their jobs on the BW, at Hoffmans, the warfside & shanty? Now we have to worry about all of the idiots on the road between last call (11 something) and when they come back after closing in the boro? Also, have a good time with all those keggers going on in the rentals! College kids dont start until 10 or later! Why would they leave to go out and be chased out of the bar an hour or so later? I am sure they will be partying in those houses till all hours of the night!!

Just Saying

7:31 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Start fining the 2 bars for fire code violations, overcrowding and serving intoxicated patrons. That should change their tune.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mattmurphy

8:18 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Just Saying - You must be a fire code official! You sound very knowledgable. You must be part of the TJA's club. You fit right in with Barrella, Corbally, Tooker and Gordon!

Tired of the 4 that think they rule the town

7:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Just saying - how do you know they do this? You are a prime example of those who spread lies and continue this rumors without nowing the truth.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Just Saying

8:51 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

How do I know what? That the places are over crowded? That they serve intoxicated patrons? I have witnessed with my own eyes. Thats how. I am also pretty sure that there might be violations with the number of toilets available per customer also. I will check that out.

Opinionated

8:18 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mr. Corbally, I have some more questions. First, you say you had more special police, how about regular police. I believe past Patch articles said you had significantly less regulars in relation to a large amount of OT going to your Chief. Second, how many more "specials" did you hire in 2011 vs. 2010? Third, have your insurance premiums gone up in the last couple of years and by how much? I cannot believe your insurance carrier is OK with having to pay for all of these legal expenses. They are in the business of making a profit. And frankly, some of your litigation could have and should have been avoided. I realize I am using hindsight but if my business had to pay, either I'd be raising your premiums, trying to encourage you to be less litigious, or dropping your account. It's all about the bottom line, sir.

Reply

Mr. Happy

8:49 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Vincent Barrella-Improving the Image of the Jersey Shore. This caption is written under a picture our of Mayor in todays Star Ledger in a SLAM DUNK article by Paul Mulshine. Mike C.-just refer all questions to this article, it's tremendous. It debunks all this Patch nonsense from the BW supporters here. Especially the "exaggerated" crime. Mulshine mentions the 2 policemen getting commendations for breaking up a gang fight of 35 rival members of the Bloods and he heard the crime reports from the previous week. He addresses all issues, the BW ties to Trenton, the ABC history of non intervention. Until now. It's all there folks. This one blows the lid off. Enjoy!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Been here before

9:24 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mr. Happy. We understand about Mr. Mulshine. Was he there during this "gang fight"? Seen the video? No? Mulshine has hated tourists his whole life. He was making the same arguments in the 70's i.e. before most of the people complaining now lived here. The people championing his arguments know, are the same people Mulshine was complaining about in the 70's. Even you have to love the irony in that, huh, Mr. Happy

Comment_arrow

MoonDogie

9:32 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

If your friend Mulshine doesn't live, work or pay taxes in PPB, I don't really care what he writes in his slanted articles. And gang fight? Really??? I have heard just about enough about the exaggerated exchange between FAR fewer than 35 people. You can't count the spectators. Get out the video tape. I'm pretty sure there is one!

Been here before

9:17 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mike. What are you talking about? A problem all agree we have? Crime rate soaring? Where is it you live? Where I live, in D4 in PPB the extra cops seem to be everywhere, they are doing a great job, and I see no soaring crime rate. I see more summons because more cops, but residents are not complaining (except for you and Tooker, and we know what that is about). Even your boy Mr. Happy says we have our neighborhoods back. All it took was increased police presence. If you think PPB is going down the tubes, you can go, we’ll take it from here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ray Criptkie

12:04 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I think Mike got his hands slapped for commenting where he is not supposed to!

Mr. Happy

9:26 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Hi Been Here- Mr. Happy stated we have the streets back because of the Parking Plan. I support the PD of course, but you can't give police all the credit for solving a problem that no longer exists, because it has been eradicated through legislation. Nice try though.

Reply

the cooler

10:16 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mulshine is a political bay head hack. Everyone knows he's a Barrella crony. Corbally are you that stupid to think we are going to buy your story about the crime rate. Everyone is on to your game and bragging that your parking plan will be paid for by next week because you are giving everybody tickets is not a good thing. How about concentrating on lowering my taxes with your crony Tooker. Can't wait till 2013 election because your history.

Reply

the cooler

10:28 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Has anyone seen the gang tape of 35 bloods and crips. It was more like 6 or 7 teenagers 3 of which were girls. This was a huge exaggeration by our illustrious pd. People wanted to view the tape but it was real hush hush . What a joke Corbally and crew have made ppb.

Reply

tom parr

10:29 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

My family owns a summer rental property. The crime rate is going to have severe long term negative effects on the area. The boardwalk bars make money no matter what kind of crowd they attract. The increased crime rate means more security that the town and taxpayers are on the hook for. The bar owners have had it their way for too long. Its time they help shoulder the responsibility for the mess they have helped create. I applaud the mayor and the council and their responsible position!

Reply

CM

10:29 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Legal extortion that's what it is!

Reply

the cooler

10:29 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

He is so arrogant he doesn't care what crony Gertner says

Reply

Been here before

10:29 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Nonsense Happy. Weekends here in D4 were as quit on the 9th and 10th and 16th and 17th as on the 234 rd and 24th. Nice try though. What is your expression here, oh yea, "your out of your league, son"

Reply

Bette DeMarco

10:32 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

How about all you young entitled spoiled brats do something besides come to the Jersey Shore, get drunk and act like idiots... have some respect for once for residents. Point Pleasant should ban alcohol period... let the millionaire business owners pack up and leave...

Reply
Comment_arrow

MoonDogie

11:14 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Betty you're in the wrong town. This is Point Pleasant BEACH. Oh yeah, and you get right on that prohibition idea.

Comment_arrow

Pat Kender

12:23 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

they cant afford thats why...

the cooler

10:36 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Bette, why don't you pack up and leave

Reply

the cooler

10:45 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mulshine to Barrella equals pelosi to obama

Reply

the cooler

10:54 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Piecekeeper, that was priceless. Lmfao

Reply

Mr. Happy

11:02 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Isn't it fascinating what the Mulshine article has brought forth? Not one attempt to refute the substance of the article (except for one that discredits the PD by saying a major riot was really only a small riot). Other than that, it's classic "attack the messenger"- because we can't attack the facts; and the attempts to discredit Mulshine by Patchers here is like graffiti artists trying to discredit Van Gogh. Kinda comical. With that, goodnight whiners at the Beach. Goodnight Mr. Mulshine, wherever you are.

Reply

Spooner

11:12 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

This is Jenkinson's posting regarding the gang incident...It contradicts Lt Dikun's version of events. . .and Barrella's parrot...Paul Mulshine...

Marilou Halvorsen

2:35 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

...We have reviewed the activities of the entire evening from our surveillance video
and there are certain facts which have been overlooked and need to be clarified.
None of the participants were in any of our facilities at any time, so Jenkinson's
had no hand in serving any alcoholic beverages to any of them. . Video tapes of the incident reveal a total of 12 – 14 individuals congregating in our parking lot at about 4:00 AM. Two individuals appear to be fighting with the remaining individuals watching. Jenkinson’s night time security guards and a Jenkinson’s employee were the only individuals to witness the entire event and they took immediate action by calling the police. Of the three arrested, none were charged with drugs or weapons offenses...

http://pointpleasant.patch.com/articles/brawl-on-jenkinsons-beach-and-boardwalk-leads-to-bloods-gang-members-arrested

Reply
Comment_arrow

MoonDogie

11:22 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

So Mr.Happy, your "major riot" was in fact not a major riot after all. I would have expected you to check out the facts before "reporting".

Redrum

11:24 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I say shut the boardwalk down on every sunday....jenks owns the boardwalk and beach.from the inlet to jenks south.i say the close everything 1 day a week and watch ptpl.go down.who's gonna come to.ptpl nj knowing they can't walk the beaches and have nothing to do on the last day of vacation. Most ppl take fri sat and Sunday off to hit the shore. I say screw ptpl all togeather.

Reply

Mander

11:47 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Yes let's close down two of the biggest business in a small tourist town there's a great idea.. Hope nobody minds severely paying for their peace and quiet with there sky rocketing taxes... How is it residents don't see this and could even suggest wanting the bars to close shop. Jenks is the one thing that town has going on. Don't move to a beach tourist town, hint there all like this. I guess we can pass another law allowing only tourist to be over 65 or parents with young children right. One hour isn't gonna change it people will just drink more in that time so what is it really gonna change.

Reply

charlotte

12:05 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Extortion should not be legitimized. Quality of life is important and somehow the cost of services has to be provided. I don't think threatening the bars in the town and having them bear the entire cost is appropriate.

Reply

Better Living

12:35 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2012/06/the_point_pleasant_beach_bar_i.html
Above is the link to the Star Ledger's article....
It is a must read!
Especially the very bottom!

Reply
Comment_arrow

AJ

8:21 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I am not saying that I agree with the bar closing at 12... I have to say this written article is very interesting in many points. It is surprising to me that SS Heights closing is at 3, yet the town of SS Park which is right next store is allowed to close at 12. I also feel if the County or State allows one town to make their own decisions all other town should have the same rights. After reading this article, the ABC is the one who should be making the decision and the State should stay of it.

Maureen J.

12:48 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Councilman Corbally has posted that the parking plan will pay for itself by next weekend. Didn't it only go into effect last week (June 22)? Have the police given a report as to how many tickets have been issued in violation of the parking plan? How many of those tickets have been issued to residents of PPB who simply forgot to display a parking pass? I think the tickets are $48, and the plan cost several thousand dollars (signs + passes). That seems like an awfully large number of tickets to have been issued within just 2-3 weeks, plus there's the loss of revenue due to free parking in Silver Lake lot, right? If anyone has information as to how much revenue the parking plan has already generated, please post it. Thanks.

Reply

Maureen J.

1:17 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Opinionated, I am personally very happy to see so many police officers back on our streets this summer. I've heard a lot about the number of Specials that were cut by Dyer & Hennessy in 2010, and was therefore really suprised to learn that the number of Specials we had in 2011 was even lower than 2010. At the 7/9/11 Council meeting, Chief O'Hara said that, as of that date, we had 55 Specials. In 2010, we had 65 Specials! That's 10 more Specials in 2010. Chief O'Hara said that in 2011, he requested $365K for Specials, but only got $305K! Corbally was the Finance Committee Chairman in 2011, so I'm sure he must realize that he cut the Specials budget in 2011. Here's the link to the minutes from that July 2011 meeting: http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1243

Reply
Comment_arrow

AJ

6:54 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I am not saying either way if I agree with the parking or not. The only thing I am going to say is. I would say there is very little loss in revenue in the Silver Lake parking lot. Families park in that lot from day until 11, most families come and go are gone by 12 the latest.. might have a few stragglers. By that time, many free spots in the residential streets in the BW area become open. That is where the bar patrons park and I don't blame them, I would too. This is the reason a parking plan was implemented to begin with. To push the bar patrons out of the residential areas over to the Silver Lake parking lot. It would not matter free in the streets = free in the Silver Lake lot.

Comment_arrow

Maureen J.

10:42 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Sorry everyone. I typed the date of the meeting wrong. That meeting was held on 7/19/11 (not 7/9/11). The link is right though.

Spooner

2:46 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Maureen J. - How could Councilman Corbally make this statement then...

We had more "Specials" in 2011 than 2010, and more this year than last. Those are facts. . .Mike you care to respond...or your going to YES us again?

Reply

debbie maz

6:09 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Pt Pleasant and it's residents allowed the sale of that land and beach to the bar for a profit, they should have thought of the consequences at that time. If the town can't cover the police need, it falls on all of the taxpayers, not just one of them. Deal with it, it's a mess everyone started...should have kept the Beach a public area to begin with. Greed made the sale, now everyone's crying, boo hoo.

Reply

mailman

6:47 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Typical snow job stats by the shady independents. Or just simply a lack of knowledge.

Reply

Rick

6:48 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Editor of Patch

Why did you not print my comments yesterday?

It was clean, straight forward, and respectful.

Reply

Mr. Happy

7:05 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hi Maureen J-
According to public record there were 122 parking tickets issued. There is no breakdown of resident/non resident. It stands to reason that a fair amount were out of towners that were ticketed because of the JenksClub internet webpage saying no new parking plan is in effect. That ad was up through the weekend. As to residents being ticketed-let's face it, this thing has been more publicized more than a Superbowl and everyone should have known.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maureen J.

10:38 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mr. Happy, thank you for the information about the number of parking tickets so far. Do you know if the 122 tickets are solely as a result of parking on D4 streets after midnight without a pass or does that 122 number include all parking tickets issued? I understand that the parking plan has been publicized. I'm just trying to figure out how much money it's actually brought in so far, considering Councilman Corbally's post that it will pay for itself probably by the next weekend. Also, it seemed to me that there was some confusion as to when it went into effect. I was originally told that would be on June 22, but then I think the Ocean Star article indicated an earlier date. Do you know the date of the first ticket that was issued for a violation of the D4 parking plan?

Patch_comments_icon

Denise Di Stephan

7:07 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Folks, can we refrain from using the "s" word in part or entirety? I had to just delete a few comments. Rick, there were so many comments yesterday that I do not remember what yours said. Can you please email me so we can discuss this privately? denise.distephan@patch.com. Thanks.

Reply

Mr. Happy

7:24 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hi Denise- Thanks for removing that tasteless comment by piecekeeper! I'm glad the "Flag as inappropriate" button works.

Reply

AJ

7:34 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

It is unfortunate that the beach in pt. pleasant was sold to a private owner. I was told that a long time ago it was sold. If it's true, I was told in the 1800 hundreds before the train was implemented. The pt. pleasant government was in doubt the train was going to be implemented, did not for see the crowd coming. Remember a big difference in time from the 1800 hundreds to the current 2012 era. I doubt the residents had much of a say during that era. Most followed the leaders, not fight them. To bad everyone just can't get a long.

Reply

june bug

8:08 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Bring the regular police number back to where it was, stop the furlow or your town workers, LISTEN to the people of your town and stop trying to get results by lying, and strong arming your town....try to respect the people that live in point beach...... Maybe if you stood behind your town employees and your police, instead of taking money out of their pockets and threatening to FIRE them every other year....stop blaming The Boardwalk for everything...maybe just maybe if that happened .........

Reply

Opinionated

9:00 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Thank you Maureen J. for this link. Now I see why my last questions to Mr. Corbally went unanswerwed. You sir, have the right to remain silent. To Denise, you have some good material here to write a really great article, don't you? Mr. Corbally's response to me plus this link http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1243 Just do the math and "happy hunting". Mr. Corbally, you may have some explaining to do!!!!!!

Reply

AJ

9:35 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

In a fairness to the residents who are going to read these links. All links that are related before and after on the same issues or subject should be posted. It is hard to understand or judge if you are only getting a piece meal affect of links.

Reply

judge smells

10:42 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Well councilman Corbally are you going to answer Maureen or are you going to now lawyer up like Tooker and Barrella have done. You should resign immediately with the other three buffoons.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maureen J.

11:07 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Judge Smells, I wasn't trying to be mean or nasty to Councilman Corbally when I posted that information. I just think it's very odd that so many people don't know all of the history of what has gone on with the police force. I still remember those "Save the Cops" signs that went up in 2008...right after Barrella became Mayor. Those signs were about whether to replace one of the full-time police officers, and Barrella took the position that, without the paid parking plan that he was suggesting, the town wouldn't have enough money to support replacing that full-time police officer. There's been a history of cutting the police department budget (not giving the Chief all of the money he requests), which usually results in a cutting of the number of Specials, and I don't think it's right that a certain group keeps wanting to point the finger at the 2010 budget, when the 2011 budget cut the Specials even more than the 2010 budget did. Now, it looks like we finally gave the Chief the funds for the number of Specials he requested, but rather than just sit back and see if we've finally found the right solution to the problem, the town has also implemented this D4 parking plan and is trying to close the bars early. That seems like overkill to me, and it will certainly lead to arguments as to what "fixed" the problem (the D4 parking plan, the bar closings if they happen, or the number of Specials), putting the Specials budget in jeopardy again next year.

Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

11:57 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The "Pilot Parking Program" started June 15th and warnings were put on cars violating the ordinance for the first week. Starting June 22nd tickets were written for violations. I believe the number of 122 is correct. I was told less than a handful of tickets went to residents, so my assumption is the warnings worked.

Maureen J.

10:52 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Opinionated, you can really find some interesting information if you go through those Minutes from last year. Do you know if we've had to hire additional shifts of PEO's (I think that's parking enforcement police officers) as part of the D4 parking program? At the 8/2/11 Council meeting, when they were discussing putting that townwide parking plan question on the November ballot, Chief O'Hara explained that the PEO's usually end their shifts at 1am. To enforce the parking plan discussed at the 8/2/11 meeting (which was from midnight until 8 am at that time), the Chief said that they'd have to hire more PEOs for later night shift. So, again, I wonder whether we had to hire additional shifts of PEOs to enforce the D4 parking plan.

Reply

Mr. Happy

10:59 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hi Maureen J- I'm pretty sure that the 122 tickets were from the new ordinance. I don't know when the first one was issued, sorry. Corbally's math is right, this past weekend has almost paid for the cost of implementation, although that was not the intent, but we get peace, with soon to be a profit. Win-win. As to the date of implementation, I really wouldn't rely on the Ocean Star for accurate info. on anything related to the BW. The first editorial they ever wrote was in support of the BW; probably an impartial piece from a paper that relies of local advertising revenue from.......yeah, you got it. You might try the Star Ledger. I hear good things about that paper.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maureen J.

11:13 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mr. Happy, is there any way to find that out, whether the 122 tickets were solely from the new ordinance? If I did my math correctly, those 122 tickets should bring in $5856, assuming that they were all issued correctly. I mention the ticketing of residents because, I don't think the town should collect on those tickets. I, personally, would feel badly if residents were getting ticketed for this plan and having to pay $48 just to have to park where they've always parked for years. I wasn't trying to rely on the Ocean Star for information. Just trying to explain that there was some confusion out there. Do you know when enforcement of the D4 parking plan actually started?

Comment_arrow

Maureen J.

11:15 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Oh, I do read the Star Ledger, too. Editorials are never impartial, and that would apply to editorials written in the Ocean Star, the Star Ledger or any other newspaper. Editorials are opinions. Obviously, you prefer to read opinions that are anti-BW. That's your choice.

Comment_arrow

Ray Criptkie

11:53 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mr. Happy, read the Star Ledger article, happens to have left out the pay to play ordinance that makes the way the town went about this illegal! But, hey it represents your view so stay Happy!

PennyStocks

11:30 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Maureen

Council was controlled by Hennessy, Dyer, Lurie and Rizzo in 2011. Hennessy and Dyer insisted on cutting the 2011 budget for specials, same as he did in 2009 and 2010.

Reply
Comment_arrow

AJ

12:47 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Bingo! The real reason why we are in the position we are in as a town and the real reason we were hit with a large tax increase.

Comment_arrow

Fact Checker

1:21 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I hate to bother you folks with facts, you seem to be having so much fun iginoring them. But here is the 2011 Budget vote according to the minutes of the April 19, 2011 meeting:

Motion by Councilman Lurie, to adopt the 2011 Municipal Budget as amended, was seconded by Councilman Hennessy and carried by roll call vote.
VOTE: Council Members Hennessy, Corbally, Lurie, Dyer….YEA

The minutes continue:

Mayor Barrella: thanked Council for sparing him the opportunity to test Judge Grasso’s ruling on whether the Mayor can vote on the budget in the Borough form of government; ......both Councilman Corbally and I agree that this budget provided light at end of tunnel

Tooker did not bother to appear, probably so she could pretend she did not cut specials

Patch_comments_icon

Denise Di Stephan

11:36 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Maureen J.: Patch has been correct and consistent regarding our stories about enforcement of the new District 4 Parking Plan. As I reported previously in 4 stories, including this one, http://patch.com/A-vfdX which was the most recent: warnings began June 15. Enforcement and ticketing began June 22. I had someone cover the June 12 meeting for me, since I was home sick, but apparently it was stated at that meeting, "The plan starts June 15" without adding the nuance of how the first week would be just warnings, with tickets not starting until June 22. That created some confusion.
I will be following up on your other questions and writing a separate parking plan story. Thank you for reading Patch and for your good questions. Also, you and our other readers can always feel free to email me at denise.distephan@patch.com. Thanks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maureen J.

1:32 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Ms. DiStephan, THANK YOU so much for clearing that up. Now, I can see how it became confusing, with the warnings versus the actual tickets. I truly appreciate your posting this information.

judge smells

11:42 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Happy your spewing bw hatred. It seems in your mind whoever doesn't agree with you is not worth listening to. If you think it's a good thing for point pleasant beach that so many tickets were written then you should not be living here. Do you know that some taxpayers kids are getting tickets because they forgot to put up their placard? Is that fair?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

12:42 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

...he's getting to be a "YES" man on Council! How about it MIKE. . .is that a yes or no? Oh yeah. . .what was your latest comment on last years Specials: more hours...less boots. . .that makes a lot sense. . .but don't you think you should have had more boots last year on the ground...wouldn't that work out better strategically at zero tolerance enforcement. . .You don't have to answer that. . .

Comment_arrow

AJ

12:52 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Yes, it would be no different than leaving or forgetting your other credentials at home, You're License, registration and insurance card.

judge smells

11:46 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Pennystocks

Who controlled the budget in 2011? Didn't Barrella and Corbally along with Administrator Riehl? Go back and look at the 2011 minutes around budget time and you will find Corbally and Barrella in charge of cutting the specials in 2011.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

12:02 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

We had more "special hours" on the street in 2011 than 2010. More money spent on "specials". The actual number of special bodies is determined in the previous years budget.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

12:11 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

According to July 19, 2011 Council meeting minutes: Corbally along with others on Council, including Barrella, and Tooker under funded Specials Budget for 2011 summer...

Councilman Lurie: thought, that when fully funding Specials in this year’s budget, as a result of bringing back the hotel tax back, we were bringing Specials to levels they were at in previous years – surprised there are 10 less – brought revenue anticipations up in the budget, because we were fully funded for Specials (requested $365,000 in 2011 for Specials – got $305,000; Councilman Corbally: they were funded at the 2009 level; Chief O’Hara: 2009 level was $365,000, 2010 was $265,000 – he requested $365,000 but doesn’t believe they got it – been trying to make it work, but the situation has changed beyond expectations)...

Mike: you being the committee goto guy, perhaps you can explain the discrepancies between your numbers and the Police Chiefs?

http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1243

Comment_arrow

PennyStocks

12:55 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

hennessy wanted 60K more cut from police budget. the cut was made and there was 60K less for specials

Comment_arrow

Spooner

3:14 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Penny Stocks- do you have proof of this...linking to the minutes of a meeting where this was discussed and voted on?

PS: what happened last year to the bloc requesting the police cut $120,000 in O/T as a give back. . .was any headway made there?

Clown Baby

12:03 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Since when did everyone start thinking PPB was Ocean City?

Reply
Comment_arrow

blindbert

12:45 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Since when do you think we ought to accept Seaside J"ersey Shore" Attitude

Comment_arrow

Clown Baby

2:45 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I'm not, but PPB was never Ocean City. It's also not even close to Seaside, basically you have one bar that is causing issues. Seaside has like 20, the way people in this town overreact is hilarious.

Mr. Happy

12:35 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hi judge smells- When my kids ever got a parking ticket, I said 2 words: "Pay it."
Mr. Happy believes in personal responsibilty for all. Especially our kids. That's how they learn.
Also, it's actually Judge Smails. Please make the correction. Thanks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Full Timer

12:57 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Why do you feel the need to speak in the "third person" IE. "Mr. Happy believes"? "Full Timer" would really like to know !

Full Timer

12:40 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

With all the negative publicity the borough as gotten as a result of these nonsensical ordinances, we might as well have 3 Great White Sharks feeding off the beaches. Either will result in keeping people away from a town that was once regarded as a leading shore community and is now considered one of "whiners" who, for the most part, dislike the tourist industry and anything related to it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Clown Baby

4:42 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

If you bought a house by the boardwalk in the past 15-20 years and are mad about tourists you have no one to blame but yourself.

HW

12:58 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

parking tickets...I understand that if you have a placard and received a ticket, the ticket will be dismissed. I have also been told, and I would love to know...if you receive a ticket in the 12-6 no parking district, you are required to go to court. I can imagine the court personel already working their tails off in the summer, will be working overtime to deal with this, along with the police who will go to court for these tickets written....and so it begins...

Reply

blindbert

1:07 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

It is amazing, more new posters every day.

It is interesting that these posters have have such a fervent view and this has been a very hot topic for long time, and THIS is the first time they posted!

Then you even try to call them on it and they go whining to The Patch (that someone is trying to figure their ID when you are just pointing out that they have the same attitude and writing style as another, MMMM!!!)

The real whiners are those Multi patchers that are either employed by, or benefit from their assocaition with ;the BW, or their politicians it in some way?

They look like they have a large groundswell of support, and in reality they are a house of cards!

Reply
Comment_arrow

MoonDogie

1:55 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Don't accuse people of creating new identies. There are no new posters, Bert. You just need glasses.

Comment_arrow

Maureen J.

2:07 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Blindbert, I find your post to be very offensive. Is there some rule about when people can join Patch and start posting on these articles? And, why is it that new people aren't welcomed? You don't have to read my posts. You don't have to like my posts. But, I think I should have the same rights that you do to post here, especially about these types of issues that, at least in my opinion, are huge in terms of our town's future. There are a lot of people, like myself, who normally don't pay any attention to our town government. We normally just enjoy our lives. But, these are serious decisions and there are a lot of us who are now very concerned and paying attention. I'm a resident, and I think my opinion should be just as important as yours.

judge smells

1:12 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I remember during the 2010 election that councilman Corbally and mayor Barrella were pounding their chests about the first order of business in 2011 if elected was going to be restoring the hotel motel tax back to its original 3% and fully restoring the specials budget to its 2009 amount of $405,000. What happened to your campaign rhetoric boys?

Reply

Spooner

1:19 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

judge smells- unfortunately there's two threads where bloggers are commenting on here. Did comment about Corbally on another thread. . . But all he can say is "YES" . . .so you'll have to rephrase you question. . .

Reply

Maureen J.

1:28 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Pennystocks & everyone else debating the Specials...It was not my intention to create some type of massive finger-pointing debate. In fact, that was my point entirely...the finger-pointing must stop. Since at least 2008, when Barrella became Mayor, the police budget has been a huge part of the game. Honestly, you all keep trying to blame different people for cutting the Specials, but the truth is, the Council only gets to cut the police department budget. It's the Chief of police who then decides where he makes the cuts, either what stuff he doesn't buy, how many people he puts on the street, etc. Not that I'm quibbling with the Chief about his decisions, either. My point is...this mess that we're in is a cumulative problem, and there is plenty of blame to go around. This year, we seem to have been on the right track in fully funding the Specials, plus Emergency Appropriations were made last year (and EVERYONE on that Council voted for those Appropriations) to send the guys to school for this year and to help provide more money for last year's police force during the summer. People make mistakes. I get it. But, really, now we've given the Chief the Specials he asked for and, instead of just seeing how that works out for us, we've added in the parking plan and possible bar closings. It's overkill and it's going to cause a lot of debate as to what really worked.

Reply

MoonDogie

1:53 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Once again the question begs an answer. Did you, Mike Corbally, receive a permission slip from the mayor and litigation attorney allowing you to address/comment/reply to matters pending litigation or are you just above authority and choose to do whatever you wish? Either way it could be considered....unethical.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Resident

2:32 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Quite possibly, the Mike Corbally posting here is one of multiple Mike Corbally's that post on the Patch? Quite possibly....none of them are actually Councilman Corbally.

Patch allows multiple people to use the same "posting name".

Comment_arrow

imposters abound

3:26 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

@A Resident: So how is it that YOU'RE so aware of ways to manipulate the Patch system by creating multiple posting names??? Possibly because you've done this yourself when you stole the login ID from another poster using the screen name "A Resident"??? Hmmmm, very interesting indeed. I would certainly imagine that if an imposter was brazen enough to steal a public official's identity by masquerading as "Mike Corbally" --- then the real Mike Corbally would immediately contact Mrs. DiStephan to have the posts removed and then contact the police to report the identity theft at once. Doesn't that make a whole lot more sense? Nice try though --you got a wild imagination.

Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

3:44 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I don't need a permission from anyone. I feel a need to respond to the lies being spread about the bar closings and the fact the BW refused all "quality of life" measures on their license that Belmar and Sea Girt bars accept. Why is that?

Comment_arrow

A Resident

9:37 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

imposters abound....I know because there is someone posting under my username... A Resident....that is not me. Really not that interesting, just a simple fact.

judge smells

2:12 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Maureen J- spot on with your last post. I don't know who you are but you have a strong grip of what the real story is.

Reply

Mr. Happy

2:59 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hi Full Timer- The third person thing is something that was started early on, just as a writing style. Then some of the bloggers Mr. Happy encountered would become annoyed with always being on the losing end of a debate, so the name spin began.
"Slappy, Dopey, etc." So of course Mr. Happy continued with the third person. Some may wonder: "but Mr. Happy, why do you want to win these debates AND annoy the blogger?" Same reason we all tap on the fish tank to annoy the fish-it's fun.
Hope that answers it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Full Timer

8:22 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Thanks Mr. H, Have a pleasant weekend !

Mike Corbally

3:33 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Why isn't anyone interested in the fact the Boardwalk refused to allow any conditions on their liquor license similar to all the other bars in surrounding towns?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ray Criptkie

11:43 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Why should they allow illeagal restrictions on their license? The other towns did their ordinance town wide, with no attempt at a shake down of specific bars! This is what makes your new law illegal, the shakedown part and the targeting of specific businesses. I cannot wait to vote your butt OUT Mike!

Been here before

3:56 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Because we understand what you are too blind to see: we are not Belmar, nor are we Sea Girt. And had you not cut the specials so you could get elected we would not be having this conversation.

D4 does not need restrictions like other towns. Anymore than D4 needs the ridiculous parking plan you lied to us to get passed.

Reply

Nick Carraway

4:19 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Councilman Corbally, if I were the BW, I would refuse to allow you to tie my shoes, never mind consenting to allow you to place conditions on my liquor license. When they offered $40K for Snap, Crackle, Pop, you, personally, accused them of offering a bribe. You wanted them to pay Special Events fees, which they told you that they felt you could not legally do. You sent them a bill, and to date, that bill remains unpaid. Is that because you cannot legally collect it, like the BW told you? Gordon and Mayer sit down to work out a monetary deal to avoid the early bar closings. Gordon says $160K per year might work. BW offers $160K, and then the BW gets told that they have to drop the parking plan lawsuit too. Quite honestly, I can't believe they continued to sit with Council members after you voted in that parking plan, which just shows me how willing they were to work with you to try to avoid an early bar closing that is going to hurt the little guys in town. So, no, not interested in hearing your side of how the BW wouldnt' consent to allow restrictions on their liquor license. You and your bloc members have demonstrated that you cannot be trusted to work with the BW.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

5:04 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Nick, I would hope everyone would want to hear both sides. That doesn't seem to be the case. Quality of Life matters in Belmar, Sea Girt, and Seaside Park and there bars have consented to reasonable conditions. None in Seaside Heights or Point Beach. I would rather be part of the first group that cares more about their residents than the nightclubs.

Comment_arrow

Nick Carraway

5:27 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Councilman Corbally, that "everyone should hear both sides" thing sounds really nice, but as I indicated, I am not surprised that the BW would not consent to allow conditions to be placed on their liquor license. You know, just thinking about it makes me think of that scene from Animal House, where the one pledge is bent over, being smacked with a paddle and says "Thank you, Sir. May I have another?" Why should the BW consent to anything you and the rest of the Barrella bloc propose? Why should they "ask for another"? As for Quality of Life, I think the police are doing a very nice job of maintaining our quality of life, and you should've accepted the $160K to put towards the Specials.

judge smells

4:50 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Councilman,

Why would anyone be interested in anything that you have to say after what you have done to this town with your cronies Tooker and Barrella. I am so ashamed to say I live in Point Pleasant Beach to anyone because all they do is say the same reply and that is what is wrong with your mayor and council.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

5:07 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Maybe because it would be the right thing for good neighbors to do? If you haven't noticed a negative swing in clientele you need to walk the Boards at night.

Comment_arrow

blindbert

5:34 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

For the first time in decades has the GB stopped letting the BW walk all over this part of town. I have lived in D4 since the late 50"S and things have really changed my friend. The people who let it happen get rewarded with Jobs, Governmnet jobs or appointment, and /or contracts for them their friends and cronies

Comment_arrow

Been here before

5:49 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

So we all we have to do is walk the Boards at night? So you don't like what we would see on a walk on the boardwalk? You don't like the way they look? What is it about the way they look you don't like? It is not the color of their skin, is it Councilman? Even you understand that would be wrong, don't you Councilman? Maybe you should be south of the Mason Dixon line. You would fit in well. If I am wrong tell me what it is about the way tourists look that you don't like.

Comment_arrow

Been here before

6:02 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Blindbert. Paranoid conspiracy theories. Name the jobs the contracts and the people Bert. We won't hear the specfics from you because you have no proof, do you Bert?

Comment_arrow

Jane Reynolds

9:48 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

since they all like how sea girt and belmar do things they could always relocate there

Comment_arrow

imposters abound

11:24 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

@Been Here Before: OMG.....LMAO.....LOVE YOUR POST, MAN!!!

It's so freakin' true...there's BW haters and then there's the closet racists lurking out there in PPB's D4 ---The RHBCC --- a/k/a The Racists Hiding Behind Computers Crowd.

Anybody remember the '80s rap tune by MC Hammer --- "U Can't Touch This"?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo

How about it Corbally? "U Can't Touch This", right? Make love not war, dude. It takes way too much negative energy to be a hater.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

12:09 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Penny Stocks- you still haven't answered my question...regarding whether or not the PBA agreed to for go the $120,000 in O/T last year. . .Now I would expect Councilman Corbally to say "YES". . .but of course if I ask him to cite the record indicating, or show us where this was agreed too. . .I don't think I'd get a reply?

I'm not interested in the blame game. . .all I want like others here...are the facts. . .

Mike Corbally

5:34 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

We should agree to disagree. I believe the police will treat the symptom, if the BW doesn't help manage their customers better, the illness will spread. They haven't been willing to take any positive steps towards that end.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ray Criptkie

11:50 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

They offered you $ for specials and you turned it down, that is a positive on their side and a huge negative on your side! And yes, when you cut the police budget, people got out of control, retore the police budget and Voila, you gain back control!

Mike Corbally

5:51 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I agree to disagree. I will enjoy the Lake and hope we all have a great summer.

Reply

Opinionated

7:58 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mr. Corbally, you never answered my question about the change in the amount of special officers from 2010 to 2011. Is this link inaccurate? http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1243

You told me that you increased them. This says otherwise and that you were present at this meeting. You did state that their work hours were more in a later post but you never replied to us. Is this link incorrect? I'm not looking to "get" anybody but this is definitely making me curious now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

8:44 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The man hours were increased. Actual specials on the road were increased. The number of specials is determined in the previous years budget. For Example: If we were to have 80 specials this year and they are scheduled for 30 hours a week equals 2400 hours per week. 60 specials scheduled at 40 hours per week gives you the same 2400 hours per week. The number of officers may or may not be indicative of shifts on?

Comment_arrow

PPNB

9:15 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

That part you explained very well , thank you.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

9:21 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

If you read the Police Chief's comment at the July 19, 2011 meeting regarding more hours and less Specials. . .he had reservations...

...Chief O’Hara: correct – manning more hours and shifts on the street this summer than last – lot more coverage but with less bodies – they’re maxed out – last year, officers averaged 24-30 hours/week – this year, they’re averaging 40+ because there are less – that’s the predicament...

Comment_arrow

PennyStocks

11:46 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The specials were maxed out last year because your boys Hennessy and Dyer cut the budget in prior years so that the cops couldn't send enough to be trained. Next time try reading.

Full Timer

8:36 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Clown Baby, in response to your posting at 4:42PM, I have been in the borough for over 50 years and my family dates back 4 generations (my daughters being the most current generation) to the 1920s, so what would give you any speculation that I bought 15 -20 years ago and am mad about the tourists? I live in D4 a block from the boardwalk and I am AGAINST the 12AM and Parking ordinances. My concern is about the borough's future NOT my personal property value.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

8:47 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Full Timer: Doesn't the future of PPB and personal property value go hand in hand?

Comment_arrow

Clown Baby

1:53 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

I was making a blanket statement, you were not my attended audience, and it was directed towards you at all. I was just saying the people who bought up around the boardwalk in the past 15-20 years who bitch about the tourists, the train, etc need to get a grip.

Mr. Happy

8:57 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mike C.- you might be better off putting a PSA in the Ocean Star and AP Press articulating the Council positions behind these issues. You would reach alot of fair minded folks who would then realize the truth. The Mulshine article did this in a very broad sense. A local response would be very effective too.
Good luck with the ABC decision tomorrow. Hopefully the Mulshine article has shone such a bright light on the issue that politics and influence are negated and the rule of law prevails.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PPNB

9:11 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Is the Mulshine article actually considered to be journalism?
Or is it an opinion blog type thing?
I really don't know. Mister happy your opinion please.

Comment_arrow

Nick Carraway

10:17 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mr. Happy, I hope you are not suggesting that the Barrella bloc use our tax dollars to buy ads in the newspapers to promote their decision about the bar closings. As for your reliance on the Mulshine article, is Mulshine an attorney?

Comment_arrow

Spooner

11:30 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

It is my belief that Barrella has been orchestrating the use of the media to bring pressure to bear on Trenton. You have to ask yourself who contacted the New York TV stations to come down here with their satellite equipment to provide live coverage of the BW on trial. . .not to mention Barrella and the Star Ledger columnist Paul Mulshine being on a first name basis with one another. . .

Comment_arrow

PennyStocks

11:55 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Million dollar companies with a marketing department but Barella got the tv stations to come down. Happy can you explain to Nick what a psa is

International Tan

9:40 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Do you sit at the Entrance of the bw bars and watch whom enters? I bet most of the people you deem suspect do not patronize these bars . Also where is the personal responsibilty? It is not the boardwalk bars' fault that these "undesirables" are vacationing here. Point beach is accessible by train, and with the bad economy and recession has become a quick more affordable day trip destination. If you want to get rid of the rif raff u will need to take that up w nj transit.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Corbally

9:51 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I have sat up there at 2AM and watched why the residents have been dealing with rowdy behavior leaving the nightclubs. The owners and I did meet a couple of times last year around closing time.

Comment_arrow

imposters abound

12:08 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

@Mike Corbally: I saw your daughters exiting Jenks Bar at 2 am last weekend. C'mon daddy dear, you know you're still Number 1....but "Girls Just Wanna Have Fun" !!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIb6AZdTr-A&feature=related

Nick Carraway

10:09 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Councilman Corbally, I find your positions somewhat contradictory. With regard to the parking plan, you have taken the position that the warnings worked, in that, according to you, once the plan was actually being enforced and tickets given, there were fewer residents who received tickets (the warnings they got previously changed behavior so that they put up their passes in the future). However, you say that the police only treat the symptom, but the illness will spread without some type of action on the boardwalk. Why is it that the police, giving tickets to disorderly persons, isn't effective in changing behavior just like the parking warnings were effective in changing behavior? Also, you say that you noticed the rowdy behavior leaving the nightclubs. Is that type of behavior, that you saw, illegal when it takes place on the BW? I've heard you state, publicly, how the police create a presence at closing time on the BW. Didn't the police take action and ticket those people who were breaking the law when they exited the nightclubs? As for the BW owners, the bartenders are not supposed to serve visibily intoxicated patrons. If you saw that happening, did you call the ABC so that they could enforce the law? Let's keep in mind that it is not illegal to be drunk. It's only illegal to drink and drive or to be drunk and create some type of disorder. Are you expecting the BW owners to detain people who are drunk &, if so, under what legal authority?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cathy Kelly

12:16 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

imposters,you bring up his daughters?,you are a dispicable human being with absolutely no class....You must make your parents proud......

Comment_arrow

imposters abound

12:52 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

@CK: Turnabout is fair play, madam.

Comment_arrow

A Resident

9:43 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Nick Carraway.....great post.

Full Timer

10:22 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hi Mike, In reply to your comment, of course property values of a community are related to its future, as well as economic conditions, interest rates and other factors. You are in the business so I am not telling you anything you don't know. My reply was that my concerns are for the overall future of the borough and not my own property values. Selfish agendas won't resolve this and, as I mentioned previously, although I disagree with you, I respect your intents in doing what you believe is correct. BTW, I spoke to Mike D. today. I still miss the days when I would run into Dan, Tim, you and he at Jenks, all enjoying yourselves. Keep cool this weekend, be it in the A/C or the ocean.

Reply

mailman

10:32 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Councilman Corbally, you're observations of people leaving the bars, just like your meetings with the BW owners, happened last year. What constructive moves or what have you seen this year?

Reply

Mr. Happy

11:40 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hi Nick and PPNB- I don't know if Mulshine is an attorney. I do know he is a nationally renowned columnist writing for NJ's #1 newspaper. I would imagine everyone in Trenton reads the Ledger and consequently his writings and they all now know what has occurred here. His last column, among other things, pretty much married the BW with Trenton and he pointed out the ABC policy of not interfering with a town's legal right to set hours-until this case. Facts both, which should at the very least level the playing field. I think we have all had enough of the Soprano State image. This is a golden opportunity to change that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PPNB

10:18 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Thank you, We shall see.

imposters abound

11:44 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Here's a little ditty for Mr. Happy and Friends:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-diB65scQU&feature=relmfu

Here's a little song I wrote...you might want to sing it note for note..."Don't Worry, Be Happy"...In every life we have some trouble...when you worry you make it double......"Don't Worry, Be Happy" now...Cause when you worry your face will frown and that will bring everybody down...Put a little smile on your face and don't bring everybody down...it will soon pass whatever it is....

Enjoy the Weekend! Go to Martells...sing and dance with Dr. Chico...party til 2am all weekend/all summer...I'm not worried...I'm Happy!

Reply

imposters abound

11:49 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Imposters Abound has decided that we need some fun, light-hearted entertainment here on Patch. I'm happy to provide the links:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=39YUXIKrOFk

Happy Summer 2012 !!! Live and let live !!!

Reply

Nick Carraway

11:56 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Mr. Happy, all I can say is "Tsk. Tsk. Tsk." You'd like the ABC to be influenced by an editorial written in a newspaper when it renders its decisions of law, and an editorial written by someone who isn't even a lawyer? And, you're using the Star Ledger as your newspaper of choice? Well, if that's how decisions of law are made in this State, we've got lots of problems, don't we? I find your reference to the Sopranos very humorous. In case you haven't noticed, I think that Barrella is also of Italian heritage, and I find his tactics to be very similar to some of the characters in that show, as well. I'm very disappointed in you, Mr. Happy. I didn't perceive you as being one of those conspiracy theorists. Here's an idea...go into your kitchen, pull out the aluminum foil, and fold yourself up a nice hat, and put it on. That hat will protect you from your worries.

Reply

Nick Carraway

12:05 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

I just received the latest edition of the Cathy Kelly e-mail chain. It appears to be e-mails sent by the BW's attorney to Gertner, the PPB Boro Attorney. What's particularly interesting is it says " I just re-reviewed your e-mail below", sent from the BW attorney to Gertner, and yet, when you scroll down, there is no e-mail from Gertner below. Instead, there's another e-mail from the BW attorney. Now, why would anyone forward this information to the Cathy Kelly chain and not at least forward Gertner's e-mail, too? And, I love this part....at the bottom of the BW attorney's e-mail it says: "This email message from the law firm of Stone Mandia, LLC is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message." Did the BW's attorney send this e-mail directly to Ms. Kelly, or did she decide to ignore the warning and foward it out anyway? Sounds like we have more litigation issues coming our way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cathy Kelly

12:13 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

ahh Nick,there you go bringing up my name again,haha What I find comical is that you can talk the big talk while posting but when I see you in person,you smile and scurry away,,,,,,I forwarded an email that was sent to me,I did not edit or omit anything,it was sent to me and asked to be forwarded......Are you threatening me with litigation,now that is hysterical,,,haha bring it on.....

Comment_arrow

imposters abound

12:39 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

@Cathy Kelly: Here's the theme song I blast out loud when I hear your name.......A Flock of Seagulls...."I Ran So Far Away". Weren't the '80's a freakin' blast? That music really made the world go 'round, didn't it?

I walk along the avenue....I never thought I'd meet a girl like you (in PPB)..."And I Ran, I jUst Ran, I Ran So Far Away, I Just Ran So Far Away, I Couldn't Get Away"...."A cloud appears above your head...That cloud is Moving Nearer Still...."And I Ran, I Ran So Far Away...I just Ran, I Ran From Night and Day, I Couldn't Get Away......"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_Pq0xYr3L4&feature=related

Comment_arrow

imposters abound

12:50 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Hey CK: Did you not understand the warning post-script disclosure. You don't forward...that which you were never supposed to recieve in the first place. It doesn't matter if you didn't edit or omit anything...I think the instructions were quite clear:

"This email message from the law firm of Stone Mandia, LLC is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message."

Which part of that warning do you NOT understand? I think you'd better give some thought to giving your email chain a little rest. The Attorney General has plenty of fodder from your email dialogues.

Comment_arrow

Sam I Am

5:39 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Ms. Kelly. No one has to threaten you with litigation. But do you think the BW lawyer will get a copy of what you have done? Probably best for you to lawyer up now.

And don't worry, the residents will be provided with the rest of the story by making Gertner's e-mails public----but no laws will be broken when their released

Cathy Kelly

12:43 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

the more you post,the more your intelligence shines through,haha

Reply
Comment_arrow

imposters abound

1:07 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

It's time to chill CK---Shine On You Crazy Diamond...Pink Floyd

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLKiMbC6s2k

Yours truly

1:05 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Keep the stupid parking plan and make the silver lake lot free from 10p-6a so all the drunks walk the boards to silver lake instead of walking the back streets. Boom problem solved. People will get the hint not to park in the streets after getting tickets for a month. Council this is not brain surgery!!!! Ya fools

Reply
Comment_arrow

Yours truly

1:07 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Allowing the bars to stay open till 2 of coarse.

imposters abound

1:26 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Hey Born and Bred Locals: Remember when the Point Beach Wrestling Team held AC/DC "Hells Bells" as their opening mat theme song? Relax ---- Enjoy the Weekend and the 2 am bar closings ---- Go Hells Bells :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLvZ_UHGiZ8

Reply

imposters abound

1:40 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Last post for the evening folks:

The SummerWind, Frank Sinatra ---- It's all part of the Jersey Shore culture ---- Get used to it ---- Welcome Bennies, you're welcome to stay, you're the lifeline to our local economy....MTV Jersey Shore wannabees --- please continue travelling south to SSH. PPB is NOT open for your type of business.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9wNfAheqnA

Reply

imposters abound

2:10 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Oh forgive me...I just had to post one more vignette to close the evening:

Imagine, by John Lennon ---- Imagine if there were no BW haters and there were no PPB racists ---- Imagine all the people...livin' for today...Imagine all the people livin' life in peace....You might say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one...I hope some day you'll join us.. and the world will be as one......Imagine all the people...just sharin' the world as one....You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one...I hope some day you'll join us... and the world will live as one....

Reply

imposters abound

2:31 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

PEOPLE of all shapes, sizes, and COLOR should be WELCOME to visit PPB, so long as they're well-behaved and respect our laws and our residents' property.

Sing, Dance, Pray...Enjoy the Music...I'll be there:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=W-apaIOOoAo

Reply

SavvyHairLoft

3:07 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

my prediction 2am closing and we will vote on it in November . it's a town issue and the whole town will vote on it. it impacts the whole town not just district four.

not a leg to stand on. as a business owner in town ANY business being impacted like this is bad business. especially 2 business's that contribute to a lot of employment / tax dollars / and draws people to this own where these peopl spend $$$ at a lot of business's. pizza places / ice cream ahops / hair salons / you don't think this bad press would effect down towns business volume? let me tell you first hand. I personally will be personally walking business to business and ask each owner " do you want someone telling you when you have to close or where people can park or how much you can charge" the "PEOPLE" will speak. that you can bet on

Reply

Mr Happy's boss

9:29 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Nick Carraway - here's an interesting thought. After reviewing "the chain " you can see ck omitted the Gertner portion but also interesting is that before she forwarded to her entire list she deleted who forwarded all of this legal and private information to her. It can only be one of two answers: Gertner himself or a member of the governing body. Hmmm. Interesting

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nick Carraway

10:13 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

You know, there are a lot of people who don't understand that e-mails can be doctored. They believe that everything they receive as a forward is an exact copy of what was written by the sender. But, people with good tech skills can do a lot to play with an e-mail and an e-mail chain. It's pretty clear to me that at least someone working on that chain has some good tech skills to have omitted Gertner's e-mail from the e-mails that were forwarded.

Mr. Happy

9:50 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

The Supreme Court has affirmed the right of gov't to create legislation in upholding Obamacare. Hopefully, the ABC will follow suit and affirm the right of local gov't to create legislation. We should all be happy with the first statement and hope for the second. After all, it's the American way, is it not? Enjoy the weekend. God Bless America!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Madison

10:27 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Mr. Happy: What? Health care and bar closing hours? You are joking, right? Why should the ABC look the other way when the governing body tries to impose taxes on businesses after the legislature tells them this power to tax is not a power given to them? The legislature created municipalities, right? The legislature decides what powers municipalities have, right? Or do you think it is Vince Barrella who decides what taxes a municipality imposes? If the ABC allows Barrella to threaten bars to close early unless they pay to stay open why can’t all Mayors do it to the bars in their towns? So the legislature says no local option taxes, but Mayors can threaten to close law abiding bars early to help pay for police? Don’t you think that until the legislature green lights this procedure the ABC has no choice but to say: “What you tried to do is beyond your powers.” I know, if they had just closed the bars there would have been no appeal. But, for whatever reason, and we all know what that reason is, Barrella Tooker Corbally and Gordon chose not to that. Now that power grab has come back to haunt them

Nick Carraway

10:09 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Ms. Kelly, I am not threatening you with litigation. I have better things to do with my money, like pay my mortgage and utility bills. I also have no idea what you look like. Maybe you should circulate a photo of yourself through that e-mail chain or have Ms. DiStephan post one? What I can't believe, though, is how someone who says that she cares so much about the town, about the residents, and has expressed unhappiness about the way this whole situation has gone would be so irresponsible as to forward an e-mail like that. Why would you, Ms. Kelly, do anything, personally, to interfere, one way or another, with the litigation that is going on? Did it ever even cross your mind to say "Hmmmm...maybe I shouldn't send this out. Maybe I will be causing more trouble"? But, even if you didn't think it was a problem, didn't you read that e-mail and say "Hmmm, where's Gertner's e-mail? Should I really send this out without Gertner's e-mail? Is it right for me to only show one side?" What I think would be really interesting is if, as a result of your sending this e-mail, that Town had to sue you, for forwarding a confidential e-mail that's part of the litigation. See, I think that could happen, especially if what you did ends up hurting the town's position by showing that they act in bad faith. After all, we know it had to be one of the Barrella bloc members that sent you that e-mail. Gertner wouldn't do it. It would cost him his license.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

12:30 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

..did Ms Kelly leave town? Haven't seen a post by her since 'imposters abound' give us his musical repertoire. . .Ms Kelly you have NO reply?. . .Did somebody tell you to shut up or shut down! The dissemination of confidential emails especially from lawyers representing a litigate against the town. . .with you a resident and known Barrella supporter([the town] makes you and others that you sent those emails too who are residents and Barrella supporters, subject to possibly affecting the on going litigation. . .if it's determined that the Council leaked them - So haha to you. . .Right now there's no judge involved unfortunately to prosecute for contempt?

International Tan

10:27 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

Do you honestly think this bad behavior will stop at midnight? There is no logic behind this law. Its stupid. Period.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BW Secrets

6:54 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Yes, I do... might have to lay some town, police workers and BW employees off.

Patch_comments_icon

Denise Di Stephan

1:58 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Full Timer: So you posted a number of allegations about what an individual might be thinking and might do in the future, admitting that they are "unsubstantiated." If they are unsubstantiated, do not post them! That goes for all leaving comments.

Reply

Full Timer

2:39 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Denise, have you read how many of the postings on here are exaggerated and unsubstantiated? I, at least acknowledged that fact and turned to Mike Corbally for some verification. Incidentally, the "source of the rumor comes from The Star Ledger at nj.com where the following post was made to Paul Munshine on June 27th, and I quote "Paul, the town should be ready for a fight worth having. There is no way the ABC can order PPB to allow the bars to remain open until 2 a.m. If I truly wanted to keep the bars closed, I would simply ignore the ABC under such circumstances and send my officers in to close or arrest the bar personnel after 12 midnight." please feel free to verify. Evidently the Star Ledger may also have its share of "unsubstantiated" material. I do respect your desire to maintain the integrity of the "Patch". Thanks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

blindbert

5:43 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

talk about whining sqeaky wheels???

Better Living

4:19 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

Anyone hear about the ABC's ruling?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Full Timer

4:23 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

I'm sure we will hear shortly since they said they would have the decision by the close of business today.

blindbert

5:39 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

I would IMAGINE that the BW found out the desicion was not going their way and are now negotiating hard!

Reply

blindbert

5:42 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

sorry for the typo!

You know it is funny that the councilman states something about the BW clientele base. Then the BW patchers throw down the race card???

Reply

Seeing Red

6:50 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012

I don't find racism funny. Read the Councilman's comments---he says all you have to do is walk the boards and look at the people---that, my friend, is the type of stereotyping on appearance which we call "racial profiling"

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Point Pleasant Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks