Judge: Point Beach Parking Plan Can Continue For Now
Judge Grasso denies motion for injunction filed by marina, charter boats and GOP officials
A Superior Court judge ruled Friday afternoon that Point Beach can continue operating its new District 4 parking plan for now, denying a motion filed by a group suing the town.
State Superior Court Assignment Judge Vincent Grasso, sitting in Toms River, denied a request by a group of commercial charter boats, a marina and a small group of residents for an injunction to block the parking plan which restricts parking from midnight to 6 a.m. on municipal roads in District 4, said Municipal Attorney Sean Gertner.
The group is suing the town to block the parking plan.
Councilmember Kris Tooker, who was in Grasso's courtroom with some other municipal officials, said she was glad to hear the decision.
"I feel that we finally had a fair chance!" she said, a clear reference to the news one week ago that the state is blocking the town's effort to compel bars to stop serving alcohol by midnight.
A full trial will follow to decide whether the parking plan should be allowed to continue for the rest of the summer.
The ordinance creating the parking plan will be in effect only until Sept. 10. If the council wants to revive it next year, it would have to introduce and adopt a new ordinance, which could include modifications.
The lawsuit was initially filed by John Jackson III, an attorney with the law firm of King, Kitrick and Jackson, LLC, 635 Duquesne Blvd., Brick. Jackson is president of the local Republican club and Marilyn Burke, one of the plaintiffs, is Republican club secretary.
However, recently, Ron Gasiorowski, who is also one of the attorneys often representing Jenkinson's and Martell's, has submitted briefs on the lawsuit and he was in court on Friday. He had worked on Jenkinson's and Martell's lawsuit against the parking plan.
The lawsuits allege that because the plan allows only residents and local taxpayers to park in District 4's metered spots between midnight and 6 a.m., it violates the Public Trust Doctrine, an underpinning of beach access laws that says members of the public should all have equal access to the waterways and beaches, regardless of where they live, according to the lawsuit.
Those filing the lawsuit are: Southside Marina, 311 Channel Dr., Point Beach; Purple Jet Fishing Charters, 407 Channel Dr., Point Beach; Golden Touch Charters Inc., 818 South St., Point Pleasant and John Cole of Golden Touch; David Riback, Niblick St.; Richard Fischer, 637 Susan Lane; Brielle; Robert Santanello, Central Avenue, Point Beach; and Rosemarie Iantosca, 205 New Jersey Avenue, Point Beach; the Miss Michele III commercial fishing boat and its captain, Ron Braen, a Brick Township police officer and resident.
Free parking is available in the Silver Lake parking lot on Arnold and Ocean avenues from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m.
District 4 Parking Tickets Require Court Appearances
Point Beach police have said that the District 4 parking tickets have no set amount for the fine. Police have said the tickets are "court-mandated summonses," which means those receiving tickets are mandated to appear in court, even if they would rather just plead guilty and mail in a check.
Police said the council has the power to decide to amend the ordinance to place this particular parking ticket on the municipal fee schedule. For example, it could become a $48 parking ticket, which is the typical fine for many of the other parking tickets issued in the municipality.
However Corbally said, "We will not amend the ordinance. We may have night court. It's a pilot program. We will have to work out the kinks after the summer if the council votes to continue the program in 2013."
He noted that Point Beach's jay walking tickets are also "court-mandated."
When asked about the parking tickets requiring court appearances, Councilmembers William Mayer and Stephen Reid said they had not known that was the case when the ordinance was adopted, they were not happy that had not been explained prior to the vote, and they do not agree with that.
A copy of the ordinance does not mention that it calls for "court-mandated summonses."
Point Beach's municipal court sessions are still held in Point Borough's Borough Hall on Bridge Avenue. Local governing bodies in both towns had agreed to move the Point Beach court back to its Borough Hall on New Jersey Avenue. However, that plan has not come to fruition yet.
Patch has emailed the mayor and other councilmembers to ask their opinions about the "court-mandated" nature of the parking plan and will continue to cover this issue as more information becomes available.
Part Timer
10:23 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
Works out best for everyone...
Bars stay open till 2am... residents get some peace and quiet
Beach_N8iv
3:31 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
AND . . . . You still get to hurt local businesses and see people lose their jobs, local people, REAL local people. YOU must be ecstatic!
SoylentGreen
10:27 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
Refusing to place the ordnance on the pay schedule is absolutely ridiculous. All that serves to do is flood the court with hundreds, maybe thousands by the end of the summer, of people and to further piss off the public.
Part Timer
10:34 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
first you hate the benny crowd, now you feel sorry for them because they have to appear in court???
SoylentGreen
2:09 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
They're not all bennys, some are locals down for the night.
tom thornton
9:47 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
By "mandating a court appearance they are in efffect "mandating " you to pay the court costs that are tagged onto everything that is in court. In short, just ANOTHER MONEY GRAB.
Part Timer
10:29 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
However, recently, Ron Gasiorowski, who is also one of the attorneys often representing Jenkinson's and Martell's, has submitted briefs on the lawsuit and he was in court on Friday. He had worked on Jenkinson's and Martell's lawsuit against the parking plan.
The lawsuits allege that because the plan allows only residents and local taxpayers to park in District 4's metered spots between midnight and 6 a.m., it violates the Public Trust Doctrine, an underpinning of beach access laws that says members of the public should all have equal access to the waterways and beaches, regardless of where they live, according to the lawsuit.
Are you kidding me... he forgot to mention that all the employees got parking passes. He also forgot to mention they have beach access thru the muni parking lot which is free.
Spooner
11:48 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
Part Timer- I wouldn't be running to the bank to cash in just yet. The judge just ruled in the town's favor on whether it would cause irreparable harm to the charter boat businesses because there was not enough evidence ...Regarding evidence, Gasiorowski said during the argument it is early in the process? So watch your P's & Q's. They'll be watching and taking notes. . .
The Judge went on to say:“There’s still a factual issue as to whether or not that restriction unreasonably denies a person’s access to the fishing industry or the beaches...”
Also the BW parking lawsuit is separate, and was filed in Federal Court. That case has yet to be heard?
Joe
6:32 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Spooner, Sour Grapes.....Just like the ABC ruling and the crowd when wild. A lot of comments were made gleefully. They were not watching their P&Q's. We won for now as the bar closings won for them.... By the way i feel the decision is going to be reversed at the end of the summer. I can't wait until that plays out. It is going to be interesting.
Spooner
11:55 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Joe- I don't know what world your living in. . .but the facts don't support it. The Council on April 17th voted down the early bar closing ordinance(2012-13) 5 to 1. . .and it was down hill from there as far as the ABC Director and Office of Administrative Law, when they reflect on their loop de loop actions?
Joe
11:10 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
Part Timer, Good one...Mr. Commonsense needs to change his name. Isn't funny how the boardwalk lawyers conveniently leaves out the most important details of the case.. Free parking for all the fisherman and 300 employee passes.... I do not agree with the employee passes,,,,they should have been charged like the rest of the residents who gets a parking pass to park for limited hours in boardwalk area. Let the boardwalk pay for their passes, consider it a benefit for their employees or let them open their own lot at nice that they do not use because of liability.
D4 Resident
8:16 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Free passes for fishermen? You have no idea what you are talking about. Honest, hardworking visitors who come to PPB for a day of fishing can no longer park on the street. Many fishing boats leave early, before 6 am, many are overnight... And what about Farrell's? They can stay open now until 2 am but patrons can't park on the street! Absurd! Their lot is small, go take a look. And the REAL issue here no one can disagree with is that the marinas and businesses like Farrell's have nothing to do with the feud between the mayor and the BW. They are innocent bystanders caught in the crossfire. AND IT'S WRONG.
Lenny
8:27 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
D4 Residents, I read this and it says nothing about Free passes for the fishermen. Read it again, It says free parking for the fisherman. Free Passes for the employees. I agree about the innocent bystanders caught in the crossfire, you forgot to mention all the those who are stuck in the fued and crossfire between the BW,their bar patrons and the town. AND THAT IS WRONG TOO!
Part Timer
10:53 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Thank you Lenny...
Joe
11:11 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
@night that they do not use because of liability.
Part Timer
7:47 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Beach_N8iv
Tell me how that wiil happen....Really....
Just another spin to try and scare people...Really....
Beach_N8iv
4:26 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Unlike the SERIOUSLY exaggerated complaints from the Squeaky Wheel District? OK, simple. People stop coming down to go fishing, the boats don't go out and the crews don't have work. Just because Mr. Dummy claims that they are local to Ireland, Russia and Croatia doesn't make it the truth. These are LOCAL people, many of whom were born here, UNLIKE certain people who are celebrating the loss of jobs and income that they DEPEND ON! Simple enough for a BENNY?
Part Timer
8:55 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Beach,
do some of the charters have there own parking and isn't broadway a county road with no parking restrictions... Nice try with another scare tactic
SPIN, SPIN SPIN................................................................................
Beach_N8iv
3:08 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Channel Drive, BENNY, if you were a LOCAL you would know that. Most charter boats share THEIR parking lots with party boats, again if you were LOCAL you would know that, there is just not enough spaces for everyone. LOCALS would know that too. Exactly WHO is spinning here?
Part Timer
7:52 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Wow, isn't funny that knowone is posting on this story...
Maybe you are refusing the read it and are still posting on the old articles...
Maybe there is just no way to put scare/spin on people like Beach_N8iv tried to do when he said that people are going to lose there jobs because of the parking plan...
Really...
Mr. Happy
8:26 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Hi Part Timer- Beachknave is correct that some local people will possibly lose their jobs. Of course, they are local to Ireland, Russia and Croatia; but locals nonetheless.
So, technically he is right. Hope this clarifies the matter.
Melvin Udall
10:57 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
"lose their jobs" does not only refer to individual employees. All indications so far this summer are that our overall tourism economy is not going well at all. VACANCY signs at all the motels on July 4? Never saw that before! C'mon, this is thee biggest week of the year in the tourism business. Wonder why it's so bad? Please don't tell me it's too hot. I'd say the economy is lousy. Too much bad press! Tourism is the economic lifeblood of our eonomy. This does not bode well for the big economic picture. M&C should be promoting tourism. Oh, one more thing. Did Jenkinson's get a permit for those darn fireworks the other night? They spent about 25k. What did we make in parking revenue? Things that make ya go hmmmmm
Lenny
11:58 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Melvin....It is the BW supporter residents on here that keep on telling the Benny's to go home. They are not wanted...You guys look like fools. You do not think they read this. Beach N8 is the best at insulting the tourist. When a tourist will complain about getting a ticket, parking...His insulting comment is always, good do not come, stay where you are at or there is another one in line replacing you. The arrogant attitude is catching up with him. To Hot, no way, it is summer. Maybe if everyone was a little less greedy, lowered their prices to get some to stay...Spark the economy by charging a little less. The economy is alway lousy according to the BW, in point pleasant while all the others are thriving........hmmmmmmm. M&C does promote tourism, just not rowdy tourism. Parking? All the BW does is promote the town to give tickets, they are all money grabers. Why would they want to come here with all the insults flying around. They can read the hatred the towns people have against the Benney's, even the ones who live here.
Lenny
8:34 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
The BW and their employees will say anything. Like someone mentioned on other posts. It is the same thing they did to try to scare/spin the school children and their parents. It is all about scare tactics to keep their gravy train coming and who cares about anyone else who is in the middle. Just like if the BW went away, our town would wipe off the map of Nj....PPB would survive with a lot less corruption. Just maybe the town could concentrate more on what should be done than what is going on now.
aron
9:05 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Why wasn't a fee put on the ticket?? Crazy having people appear in court for a parking ticket whose idea was that??? As if parking is a crime..I can not believe the absurdity of all this. Having to go to court is insane Who pays for all the court time???
Full Timer
9:09 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
A few years ago, the town put up double stop signs on the corner of Boston and Central (adding two on Central), because of numerous accidents at that intersection. They did this without DOT approval because road change applications take 4 months to review. The council (this is prior to Barella BTW) put up the signs on May 15th put in the DOT Application and then withdrew and took down the stop signs every September 15th. I still go either way on the Parking Ordinance issue, but if the current council is taking a page from the "stop sign" playbook, it may very well be "fact of life" in D4 without a lot of legal maneuvering. Good for D4 Residents? Probably. Bad for Boardwalk Business? Maybe. Only time will tell on this one. According to Mr. Corbally, they are working to eliminate the court appearance for the 12AM Ticket, which is the right thing to do. Hopefully this happens quickly. I'm off to the beach and the volleyball court to hopefully get some playing time in before it gets unbearable. Have a nice weekend.
JD
10:26 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Grasso is one of the dumbest judges in NJ... didn't you know... (ok... lowest rated)
A career state employee... prosecutor office then judge...
He wasn't a good enough lawyer to get a job at a law firm...
A trial??? What is the fact issue in dispute???
JD
10:43 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
The reason Grasso didn't want to decide the case on a motion...
so the parties reach a resolution... therefore no trial... no appeal.
And they can't have a trial by end of august... and the ordinance expires by Sept 15 therefore the issue is mute!!
Classic case of a judge with no cahones...
but knowing Jackson, he will appeal the decision as an emergent matter.
Furthermore, I don't have a problem with the parking plan.. those going to Jenks or Martells can park in the parking lot... plenty of space there by 10pm. Perhaps there may be some streets that it doesn't apply to... such as Broadway and Ocean Ave. which have meters... or any other place with meters.
Spooner
11:44 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
JD- the Judge made a decision and ruled against Jackson(Marina's) motion to stay the parking ordinance. He ruled that there was not enough evidence to sustain their allegation?
PS: where's this Superior Court Judge ratings meter link?
JD
12:22 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
I don't thinks so spooner...
if so... he would have dismissed the case instead of going to trial!!
JD
12:37 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Spooner...
New Jersey Law Journal for Judges rankings.
Spooner
10:53 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
JD- that Judge's ranking information requires a subscription for access?
Lenny
4:16 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
What happened to arrogant John Jackson, hands down was the better Lawyer? Coming from a retired police working for the BW now...I do not think Judge Grasso would appreciate hearing that from you.
Mr. Happy
11:14 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Hi JD- Mr. Happy was going to respond to your 2 postings, but on second thought he has decided to stay moot,,,uh, I mean mute. But folks, check them out. Classics both!
blindbert
2:06 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
You know it is funny that PPB and the County are predominately republican. Republicans tend to be Advocates for home rule. The towns in NJ have a right to govern themselves and that includes but not limited to traffic, parking, And alcohol.
I guess The Honorable Judge made a decision that may not be popular with The happy Gilmore clan.
But what the heck he is soon to retire and making proper judgements, He has no furhter judical aspirations except having his judgements be clean.
On the other hand we have Political climber @ the ABC who is still climbing and has to give favor as needed by the party! Money talks , BS walks.
Spooner
3:08 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
blindbert- that's the point..your town can't govern. . .Anyone: more grease for the squeakys'. . .That's why the ABC is involved. . .Judge Grasso was involved. . .and now the Federal Court is involved. . .and Barrella threatens to sue the state to pay for police. This is the FAB4 idea of resolving issues. . .use the stick...beat them in place. . .or fight it out in Court if they don't go. . .Meanwhile the town is suffering from the factional in fighting. . .I think Barrella calls that good Mayoral Leadership??
...You know I'm just wondering: when they issue other parking tickets, are they mailable?. . .Because if they are, there could be a discrimination lawsuit coming. . .But don't fret. . .the town carries litigation insurance. . .that's Barrella's Way way of doing things. . .
JD
4:39 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Litigation insurance has a deductible.... and has a cap.
The town is going to get a large legal bill pretty soon...
For those active at PPB... ask for all the legal bills that are to be paid every meeting... get the details... and start adding up how much this BS is costing PPB.
Like I said, I'm ok with the parking restrictions... but some streets and locations should be open... meaning not ticketed.
- Any place with a parking meter in D4 should NOT have the restriction.
- Ocean Ave & Broadway should NOT have the restriction.
- The locations in commercial or school zones should NOT have restrictions... for instance, all around the K-8 school and fields will get ticketed.. it should only be on the side of the street with houses.
- Etc.. I'm sure there is a large list of what locations should be exempted from the ordinance.. then everyone will be happy!! The town will get more revenue from tickets and parking fees in the lots.
George Loder
4:59 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Finally... the residents get a break. I found it interesting in Judge Grasso decision that he did not mention the cost associated with going to the beach as a barrier to beach access for the tourists. To get on the beach now costs $9 dollars a person>>plus parking $20 to $25 a day >> $10 dollars to rent an umbrella.I do not think the private beach operators can claim poverty. Just a reminder for those who live outside of PPB that our town does not get one dollar from the beach fees charged but the private beach owners. Congrats! Mr Gertner on a well won victory for the residents of PPB.
George Loder
ppb1955
5:20 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
George Our town owns Maryland Ave beach that is not free of charge. How much money does the town receive in rent for that public beach area.
Buddy
5:23 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
I find it funny that the loser in the republican primary (backed by barrella et. al) who lives nowhere near D4, comes up with these comments. The judge was not charged with arbitrating a beach fee dispute Mr.Loder, he was asked to decide the merits of an ill conceived parking plan (barrella backed) that was aimed directly at the BW proprietors. No wonder you lost by so much last Election Day. Now please go away for good!!!!!!
Spooner
10:37 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Judge Grasso only ruled on not staying the ordinance(putting it on hold) as it was argued by the Marina attorney: in that it would do irreparable harm. . .due to not having enough evidence. That will begin to change if Charter/Marina patrons who have been ticketed, have to make personal appearances in Court. The rest of the lawsuit is still on. This was reported by APP, when Judge Grasso said:“There’s still a factual issue as to whether or not that restriction unreasonably denies a person’s access to the fishing industry or the beaches..." And remember: the BW has filed it's own lawsuit against the parking restrictions in Federal Court, which has yet to be heard. I guess Mr Loder doesn't read the APP?
http://www.app.com/article/20120706/NJNEWS/307060147/Judge-rules-Point-Beach-can-continue-parking-plan?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|Frontpage|s
ppb1955
8:07 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
George Loder. I think I am correct about the town owning the Maryland Ave. beach. Can you confirm that our town does not get one dollar from beach fees in PPB.
ppb1955
8:12 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
George Loder . You are just another Cousin Vinny Barrella From Brooklyn Lackey.
Lenny
9:52 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
ppb1955.. And you sir, Are just another dumb piney from Point Beach!
mattmurphy
7:14 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Lenny,Joe,Sam whatever your identity is today. You are the one who appears pretty dumb. Any local knows that a "piney" is from South Jersey (the Pine Barrens). Locals are considered "clam diggers". Duh! All of you are definitely "bennies".
ppb1955
10:11 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Lenny
I would prefer the term Clam Digger. For your information Pineys are from south jersey. But back to the subject I believe George Loder is spreading false information once again. I really believe the town derives a certain dollar amount in rental income from Maryland Ave beach. I am not quite certain what the true amount is . I would appreciate if anyone would know the amount.
Spooner
11:17 pm on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Although the Maryland Avenue Beach is owned by the borough, Aqua Serve Lifeguard Service leases and operates it. The difference in ownership means Aqua can charge whatever admission fee the market can bear, while municipal operation of the beach would mean the state sets the maximum fee, said Borough Clerk Maryann Ellsworth.
And that’s been a losing proposition for the community.
"We lost so much money running it that we decided at least six years ago to lease out the running of the beach," said Ellsworth, who added that the borough lost from $10,000 to $14,000 annually when it operated the beach...
...more beach history:
...Minutes from the Aug. 16, 1887 meeting of the Point Pleasant Beach Council state "Ownership of the beach turned down by the Council because of extreme cost to the borough for maintenance," according to the Point Pleasant Historical Society. At that point, the council decided to permit privately owned beaches in the borough.
. . .and Barrella complains about the beach money!
http://www.politifact.com/new-jersey/statements/2011/sep/05/vincent-barrella/point-pleasant-beach-mayor-says-boroughs-beaches-a/
ppb1955
1:02 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Spooner Thanks for the information Vinny Barrella should focus on the Maryland Ave beach. I am going to see how much Aqua Serve pays PPB per season. It may be in the towns best interest to sell the property to a private individual and collect the property taxes. I am sure there are many other issues that are being neglected by Mayor Barrella . He should embrace the revenue centers in town and work with the business in town to bring PPB back to its glory days.
ppb1955
1:07 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
George Loder
Spooner
1:19 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
The article was written a year ago and said they were paying $2000 annually. There doesn't appear to be any capitalistic endeavor to owning a beach according to the article. . .So who would by it...and for what price? Now if you were able to build a condo, etc...But I don't think the state and Federal Govt would permit that?
PS:I believe you got the wrong guy for all that embracing?
ppb1955
1:21 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
George Loder Wow PPB receives tho thousand dollars per year for Maryland Ave beach and supplies portable restrooms . The town would receive much more in property taxes. And Mayor Barrella wants to buy Risdons beach .The town bought Risdons Parking lot for three million dollars took it off the tax roll and now gets I believe fifteen thousand dollars per year plus a minimal amount in parking revenue.Talk about a losing proposition.
Mr. Happy
10:20 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Hi Spooner- I see you are going to look into the Hon. Judge Grasso's rating history. Or something. Please post that info ASAP. Could you also do some research and let us know the final score of Superbowl V, Carl Yastrzemski's BA in 1967 and how many times Lassie barked in episode 6? They are all equally irrelevant and as unimportant. None of them will change the decision. The only number that matters here is 12. As in 12AM. I'm goona give you a headstart on Yas' BA in 1967. It was .326. Thanks in advance.
MoonDogie
10:34 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Mike C. Please clarify your opinion on mandatory court appearances for district 4, after 12:00 parking tickets. Below are two direct responses from you, one very different from the other. Are they your opinions or "fed" responses?
Mike Corbally
11:58 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
I agree the court appearance should not be needed. This is unfortunately, one of the many government issues that should be able to be fixed quickly. We are trying. I was surprised that jay walking and other minor infractions are on the list, and some fines I would think a court appearance should be needed are not. That is not for me to judge though. The court has scheduled a night court session for these fines, but I've been told we may be able to accept payments with certain paperwork. I will give you more info as I get it.
IN THE ARTICLE ABOVE YOU ARE QUOTED:
However Corbally said, "We will not amend the ordinance. We may have night court. It's a pilot program. We will have to work out the kinks after the summer if the council votes to continue the program in 2013."
So, is this the answer we should go with or should we wait for the next "agreed upon" response after the 4 of you have time to discuss? Please let us know.
Mike Corbally
7:48 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
The ordinance isn't the problem and doesn't need amending from what I've been told. It needs to be put on the list of payable fines. That is a court issue and timing issue. We are trying to make it easier for people to pay the fines, and a night court in September has been scheduled. When I find out more I will tell you. Thank You!
nobody
8:11 am on Monday, July 9, 2012
How the heck could you actually be expecting an honest answer from the man who lied to the people at a council meeting by telling them that he had spoke to the county and was told that they would support a parking plan, when all the while he was in possession of a letter which said the opposite. This is the same trusted elected official who leaked a confidential and sensitive letter to the CK/Barrella propaganda email chain. I am sure there is no way to prove it but I would bet that the court appearance was done purposefully. Barrella and Corbally are both very nasty and vindictive people.
TK
10:35 am on Sunday, July 8, 2012
Hi Spooner.... I think you and all the BW supporters need to ride on the 'TILT A WORLD" Have the bosses get right on that.
Spooner
12:33 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
TK- ever since the 1980's with the first economic/housing boom which bought Barrella and the others down here...there has been attempted political upheavals addressed at the commercial businesses. In 1987 you had the famous liquor case: A&P vs. Mayor of Point Pleasant Beach...then 1992 another famous liquor case: Martells vs. Mayor of Point Pleasant Beach...more recently there was the White Sands vs. Mayor of Point Pleasant Beach. . .and in 2006-7 there was a continued attempt to redo the Broadway commercial district until the housing market collapsed. Nothing has changed. . .the bennies as there called could well live without the BW bars. . .and although they will play the politically correct game(call it compromise). . .it is what it is!
So TK are you one of them. . .I don't know where your coming from? You seem to imply from previous posts...your connected to PBA. . .Is That Your Point!
Your right I support the growth of business. . .that "Tilt a World" provides for the viability of the state, or do you think the it's all about public sector supporting itself. There was a Tourist Study commissioned by the Beach Government in 2006. It reported that the tourist industry in NJ generated over $424M to the states economy. Now I welcome people to make comments here. . .but please do some reading. . .and the one liners?
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/documents/TourismStudy_2007.pdf
D4 Resident
3:19 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
For all you residents in support of the parking restrictions, I challenge you to take a ride over to Channel Drive. The fishing industry is on Channel Drive, not Broadway. Look around. Look at the cramped parking lots on the weekends. Then tell me... Exactly how are these hard working folks adversely affecting your quality of life? How is it fair to restrict parking in this area, half a mile from Jenks and Martells?!
PennyStocks
11:45 pm on Sunday, July 8, 2012
now their is a classic
if the ordinance just restricted an area near jenks and martells they'd be crying that they were being picked on
Nick Carraway
12:11 am on Monday, July 9, 2012
Didn't I read on another article a post from Councilman Corbally that 200 tickets had been issued with regard to violations of the parking plan, so that the plan was expected to pay for itself by this week, maybe last? But, if the people who received the tickets have to come to court, were they even assigned a court date yet? Have we collected any of the money from these tickets? One of the biggest problems with parking tickets has always been collecting the fees for them, and that's with tickets that you can send in the money. People have posted about a $48 fine with the tickets. Is that the actual amount, or does that still have to be approved somehow, too?
Nick Carraway
12:19 am on Monday, July 9, 2012
Mr. Loder, you are correct in that the town does not own most of the beaches in PPB. The town also does not have to pay to clean those privately owned beaches, pay for lifeguards or pay for liability insurance for those beaches. And, those beaches are there year-round, and would be there, regardless of who owned them. Nevertheless, the town manages to make....was it $3.3 million dollars from tourism each year? I can't remember Councilman Mayer's exact figure.
Jane Reynolds
11:19 am on Monday, July 9, 2012
Bayhead doesn't own their beaches either
Important Questions
7:36 am on Monday, July 9, 2012
Has anyone else noticed: Barrella supporters, when posting under their real names, never bash the PPB schools or the PPB police; but Barrella supporters who use aliases (Are they the same people?) bash the schools and cops a lot. (See Sam’s posts and Joe’s posts on the article about Barrella’s request for State Police) Since Barrella started as a critic of the schools and the police (and of all things PPB for that matter), and only changed his tune when he needed the cops and school community to defeat the recall, don’t you think it is time for the cops and school community to recognize Barrella and his supporters do not, and never did, have any respect for our schools or police?
mattmurphy
8:16 am on Monday, July 9, 2012
You are so right! Sam and Joe suffer from MPD. She has many other aliases that have also trashed our police and schools. Too much Sangria!
Sam
9:01 am on Wednesday, July 11, 2012
mattmurphy/DM,Vocie of Reasons, HAHAHA, How many MPD is that for you? I lost count because you keep on reinventing yourself. You are the one who is guilty of MPD and are putting the blame on others. You are too funny! It is not trashing if it is true. You are constantly complaining about the police and schools too....They need a reality check just like the businesses according to you. So is everyone in the community. Smile in front of them, then talk about them behind their back. I do not drink Sangria....I prefer beer,,,,,Duh! Hon, I am not a she so you definitely are mistaken who you think I am...
Joe
8:16 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012
matt: I would have answered you sooner. I was on vacation a few days... You are absolutely nuts....I am not Sam, don't like to drink at all. I am a male not a female...Three strikes you are out. Now, if you think there is NEPOTISM in all the towns including this one. Then there is really no hope for you! Some times they even cross to the towns that are next to each other. You hire my family member and I will hire yours. Please, everyone is aware of these practices. Its called Politics.
Joe
8:29 am on Thursday, July 12, 2012
matt; If you really think there is not Nepotism going on in the towns including this one than you are only kidding yourself. If you think most are not aware of this, then you are only kidding yourself. Good Day Sir!
Mr. Happy
9:47 am on Monday, July 9, 2012
Hi Important- Here are some examples from the police bashers from top to bottom: There have been questions about the crime stats released by the Chief, Lt. Dunkin gets regular negative comments here, the integrity of the 2 officers that were decorated has been questioned by those that deny last summer's incident for which they were awarded and even the kids on parking patrol have been referred to as "Nazis." All this from----the Barrella bashers. Try another important question. Mr. Happy will be glad to answer.
Spooner
12:13 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
More smoke from Happy. . .Bluff...Bluff...Bluff? Remember the Mayor in 2010 said: in order to build up surplus he agreed to spending cuts. . .then the Council cut $100K out of Specials budget...When the sxxt hit the fan last year, they pointed fingers at the BW. . .with Dikun(the political activist in residence) covering the town's rear. This year the BW has hired it's own detectives to keep watch and document where need be...it's patrons leaving their establishments. . .Mayor am I mistaken about your words on the 2010 budget?
PS: Happy. I keep asking this question about the PBA's full page ad in the June 4, 2010 Ocean Star on page 9, which stated:"The Point Pleasant Beach You Know In 2010 Won't Resemble The One You Will Come To Know In 2011". . .What did they mean by that statement??
Important Questions
12:38 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Hi Mr. Happy:
What Joe and Sam are doing is very different. Some Examples from the postings on the article about Barrella asking for State Police:
Sam 2:26 AM
“Residents can't say anything about the country club police or the schools. If they do their will be some sort of retaliation…Some are going around stating that the police will be giving out tickets to the locals that spoke in favor of the bar closings if their 0/T hours are cut. Some are fearful that something will be planted on them. Residents should not have to live in such fear to speak up.”
Sam 3:24 pm
“My own experience nothing can be said about the schools in general, if a parent or student says anything that is wrong...they will take it out on the kids who parents have complained.”
Joe 9:39 pm “NEPOTISM IS RAMPANT IN THIS TOWN AND EVERY TOWN.....Go connect the dots in School, Town, Police and Boardwalk. You have parents and their kids that work in the schools that is married to policemen that work for the boardwalk too... they are all bloodsucking leeches.”
Important Questions
12:38 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
What Mr. Happy was referring to are the many posts from residents objecting to the way Barrella exaggerates the Chief’s reports, the way Barrella misused and exaggerated Lt. Dikun’s reports, and the way Barrella blew up a fight (as any who have seen the video have said) into a riot. So while the Police are simply pointing out the need to reverse the trend of cutting the police budget begun with Barrella’s coming to power in 2008, Barrella is trying to turn these facts into an indictment of the Bw businesses, and the residents are objecting to this misuse of the police department by Barrella. Sam and Joe, as noted above, are saying something very different.
Mr. Happy
2:38 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Hi Important and Spooner- You both spun a bit off topic. My post was a response to the statement that Barrella supporters bash the police here on the Patch. That's all. Mr. Happy doesn't care about school issues or budget issues at this time. My examples are from regular bloggers/haters. Heck, even Spooner's post today is confirmation, with another Dikun smear. Sam is a one hit wonder here who heard about police retaliation, evidence planting, etc. From people at a little league field in Toms River. C'mon please.Look, I know it's slow now and absent any news, we tend to create issues for debate. That's fine. But remember, the only thing standing between us and the barbarians at the gate are the police. On a lighter note (for Spooner), the score on Superbowl V was 16-13. You only need to research Judge Grasso and Lassie now. Thanks in advance.
Important Questions
3:16 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
No one is surprised that a Barrella supporter like Mr. Happy does not "care about school issues or budget issues at this time." That was my point: Barrella and his supporters have only been pretending to care about PPB's schools and police. And we all recognize the style of Joe and Sam and none of them are "one hit wonders" and you know it. Point remains, no matter how much Mr. Happy would like to avoid the point: Barrella supporters are showing their, and his, true colors. They want to remake our schools and our police because they see our school employees and our police, and I quote Sam, as "bloodsucking leeches."
nobody
3:38 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Amazing isn't it, if you wait long enough the real truth always shows up! All this turmoil and embarrassment being cause by a small group of people who really hate their lives and therefore strive to make everybody elses just as miserable.
Nick Carraway
7:40 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Nobody - Like it!
Mr. Happy
4:14 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Hi Important- We all know there are bloggers here that use multiple aliases. That's fine. You confirm this by saying "we all recognize the style of Joe and Sam." You yourself (Important Q for now) are not new here, clearly. Your style is recognizable too. Some have been discredited and had to change. I get that and I'm pretty sure you do too (wink). Is it an attempt to create the illusion of more naysayers? Or the VC tactic of hit and run? Sorry, but the constant morphing fascinates Mr. Happy.
It's frustrating too, because there never is enough material to respond too. Thank God for Spooner.
Important Questions
4:29 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Now Mr. Happy these posts aren't about who bloggers are: who cares. Nor is this post about the paranoia the Barrella supporters exhibit concerning whether all these anti Barrella posters are one or many---again who cares. It is not about how many blog pro or con---it is always about the point the blogger makes. Barralleites like you don't like Patch rules because these rules focus on the message, not the messenger. And we all know how Barrella and his minions like to attack the messenger when they don't like the message.
No, these posts are not about any of that.
These posts are about the fact, which you have yet to dispute because you can't, that Barrella started as a critic of the schools and the police (and of all things PPB for that matter), and only changed his tune when he needed the cops and school community to defeat the recall. The residents now recognize Barrella and his supporters do not, and never did, have any respect for our schools or police. And that, Mr. Happy, is, for you, the uncomfortable truth.
Mr. Happy
4:49 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Hi Important- OK. Seems we have exhausted this and just in time, it's almost cocktail hour. Looking forward to future sparring, regardless of whatever heading you post under next. Always, Mr. Happy!
Important Questions
7:53 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Mr. Happy---Shhhh---don't look now but Sam is still posting----you have to check out her paranoid ramblings posted within the hour on the "Barrella calls for State police" article. Truly priceless.
Sam
11:05 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Important Questions, Sorry to disappoint you. They are always considered paranoid ramblings of half truths if someone does not agree. Yes, lets discredit anyone who gets in our way. Let's help our own and who we support, even it is WRONG! Let's redirect the light that has been shine upon them by shining it somewhere or at someone else were it does not belong. Let's all agree to disagree. I will not believe all your paranoid ramblings or other rambling comments that are posted and you and others do not have to believe mine. Agreed. Truly priceless indeed!
Sam
11:28 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Important Questions: FYI, You have the wrong sex, but keep on guessing!
Nick Carraway
7:45 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Mr. Happy, since you'd like to stay on topic, can you maybe provide some answers to my questions about the tickets and fines for the parking plan? Do you know whether any of the tickets that were issued so far have resulted in any of the people coming to court, or are those court dates not yet assigned? Is the fine for those tickets $48 or is that still up in the air, too? It's okay if you don't know the answers to these questions. Just let me know. Thanks.
Mr. Happy
8:59 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Hi Nick- Pretty sure the fine is $48. Come to court and lose (almost always) add court costs. Not sure that expense. Too early for court dates. I believe there is a Sept. eve court session planned. Punish the deserving? Oh yeah.
Beach_N8iv
10:31 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Since you have to go to court (and pay court costs anyhow) you may as well plead not guilty. If the kid that issued the ticket has gone back to school or whatever doesn't show up to court you can get the ticket dismissed. If nothing else you get to help clog the "justice" system up and cost the town a little money.
Mr. Happy
9:12 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Hi Important- Thanks for the update on Sam. Hey, BTW, did you ever read Ball Four by Jim Bouton? Great Book. I will now quote a line by the great Mickey Mantle when he rolled up the window on the bus when accosted by autogragh seekers: "Take a hike son."
Important Questions
11:26 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Hi Mr. Happy---I see the truth stings. I hike a lot, but I take no orders from you. I prefer a quote, originally directed at a misguided self described journalist, just like you, adapted from Robert Zimmerman by me just for you---"There is something happening here, but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr. Happy?"
Sam
10:20 am on Wednesday, July 11, 2012
The only book or movie that would describe this town is Robin Hood.
Spooner
11:33 pm on Monday, July 9, 2012
Happy- sometimes you should do as Doctor Evil said...Zip it! Are you sure your not a Barrella clone? But listen you keep writing. . .I'm sure the FAB4 will bestow honors on you. . .maybe even present you with plaque. . .
...but listen: what does questions about...what was it football...or was it baseball. . .have too do with the Judge's injunction ruling. . .maybe you could enlighten us!
...and I think the Marina's attorney, John Jackson's opinion of Judge Grasso and his ruling as reported in the Ocean Star is right on the money. . .sorry if you don't agree. . .or whatever it is...your trying to portray or imply??
http://starnewsgroup.com/weekly/2012/07.13.12/judge_denies_07.13.12_47896.html?featured=*
Mr. Happy
12:05 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Hi Important- Ah, but you see, this Mr. Jones does know what it is. And I didn't google it. I'm #1 fan. Ok don't take a hike son. But you are clearly out of your league.
Son.
Important Quiestions
8:14 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Hi Mr. Happy-----if you think you’re the #1 fan I can only assume you have been spending too much time with Barrella. Unless, of course, these arrogant delusions of grandeur we keep seeing from you spring from your own tortured soul.
Mr. Happy
8:29 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Hi Spooner- I see taxes will increase in your town. I assume you will leave our town alone for a while, whilst you savage YOUR Mayor?
Hi Important- Relax, it's too early for the hate and discontent part of the program. You might try decaf instead. Enjoy the day!
Laura
9:30 am on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Mr. Happy,
Spooner is arguing with you because his favorite blogging site, boroindependent.com, has been mia since May with no real explanation and only an occasional posting from Cortland. When or if that site starts up again, I'm sure he will be posting his disjointed arguments there.
Part Timer
2:21 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Sorry to go off topic here but I was away for a few days...
Question, on July 4th I had noticed a GOOD amount of people in town/beach walking around with there pants hanging down past there hips with there underwear showing and was wondering if there is a way the town can put a ordinance in place for indecent exposure?
Other states have put this saggy pants into law...
Mr. Happy
2:26 pm on Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Hi Melvin U.- You are correct, Judge Grasso is a (R) appointee. A judge at that level is immune to political pressure and free to decide a case on merit alone. And we see how that went. Keep in mind, that will be the scenario moving forward. No longer will these cases be decided by someone that will leave an appointed position when the Governor leaves. This fact must be disconcerting to those who brought the lawsuits.
As to Mr. Gertner having a "Happy party" because he is cashing in. The town will probably tap additional legal help, putting a damper on the "party." Although seemingly outgunned by numbers and resources, he alone won the first go-round. And politics aside, I think even the haters would have to say that Barrella's "hand picked" attorney has shown that he is quite competent. Kinda like how David was competent when he came up against Goliath.
Vincent
10:59 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Last weekend I received a parking ticket for no pass displayed. I have no problem paying a normal fine for the violation but Court Appearance Required is very excessive. Now I also lose a day of work and will have to pay court costs. The court date is 9/28. I wonder how many NJ residents are going to get screwed by this?
Beach_N8iv
5:27 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012
If you have to go to court anyhow be sure to follow the instructions on the ticket and plead not guilty. If the parking nazi that wrote the ticket is back in school or otherwise unable to show up in court you walk away.
Mr. Happy
5:54 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Hi Beachknave-Why do you insist on calling the college kids, working their way through college, Nazis? I know you don't like the Mayor, but college kids too?
Maybe anger management would be the way to go?
Beach_N8iv
6:42 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Get my name right or ignore my posts, imbecile.