Point Beach Amusement Games License Fees Will Increase Slightly, Special Event Fees Will Not
Point Beach Council approves amusement games license ordinance, votes down ordinance that would increase special events fees
The Point Pleasant Beach Council has decided to raise Boardwalk amusement games fees and keep special event licensing fees the way they currently exist.
The council voted on two ordinances that were introduced at its last meeting in March and were up for second reading and adoption at Tuesday night's meeting.
The amusement games license fees ordinance was unanimously adopted by the council without much discussion.
A proposal to raise an additional $12,000 annually through increasing Boardwalk amusement game fees was voted down by the council last month, and a new ordinance that will raise $6,000 through games fees was introduced in its place and adopted on Tuesday night.
The ordinance that caused some controversy during the meeting was a special event licensing fee ordinance where Mayor Vincent Barrella and Councilman Mike Corbally clashed with representatives from Jenkinson's about which of its summer programs are considered "special events."
The fee would be $2,000 for a license per day for outdoor events that draw 200 people or more. That would be a $1,000 increase beyond what an existing ordinance requires. The original ordinance also required a license for events that draw 300 people or more.
The council members had previously voted to table the ordinance and discuss it further at Tuesday's meeting where it was rejected by a 3-1 vote with Corbally casting the lone affirmative vote. Councilmen Tim Lurie, Sean Hennessy and Jeff Dyer voted not to approve the ordinance.
Corbally has said that Jenkinson's has not been paying the $1,000 fee because it has never filled out applications for the license.
However, he also asked Edward McGlynn, an attorney for Jenkinson's, to begin filling out applications for licenses for 45 of their upcoming events.
At the request of Jenkinson's, police Chief Kevin O'Hara supplied the council and Jenkinson's with a list of specific spring and summer boardwalk events that require extra police coverage.
The list, which is also available to the public, has a total of about $20,000 in costs for police services for events, such as the Easter Egg Hunt, which was held on Palm Sunday, the Easter Sunday parade and the Memorial Day WPLJ concert.
The list also includes weekly summer events such as Wednesday night concerts; Thursday night fireworks; Big Joe Henry shows on Sundays and Radio Disney concerts.
The calculations were based on the number of officers needed, the hours required and a hourly pay rate of $11 for special police officers.
Ron Gasiorowski, an attorney for Jenkinson's, addressed the council and said he disagrees with some of the events on the chief's list being classified as "special events" that require a license fee. He said events like the Father Alphonse Concerts which are held at Jenkinson's in the summer are not special events.
"I feel we don't have to pay a licensing fee for them," Gasiorowski said.
He said the increased licensing fee would not be a fair thing for Jenkinson's and other organizations in town.
"This is a tax upon my client, and it will be resisted," Gasiorowski said.
Barrella said it is true that in the past Jenkinson's has not paid the licensing fees for such events, but that they should, similar to other organizations such as the Point Pleasant Beach Chamber of Commerce.
Gasiorowski argued that because Jenkinson's is an entertainment business, its events, such as the concerts, should not be considered special events because they have been held for years and are part of their regular business.
Dyer agreed with Gasiorowski and said raising the special event fees is not fair for businesses and organizations that wish to hold events on their own private property.
The council later voted to waive any fees, including police and boardwalk fees, for Jenkinson's Easter Egg Hunt and Easter Parade. Corbally was the only council member to vote against waiving the fees.
Barrella said Jenkinson's incurred a $440 bill for police fees which included eight officers who were on duty for five hours each during the Easter Egg Hunt.
Corbally said that in his meeting with Jenkinson's, he was told that the business would donate $40,000 to the special officers budget in Point Beach.
Gasiorowski said he wanted to clarify that this donation would not be made in lieu of dropping any fees incurred by Jenkinson's from its special events.
Barrella said he would be fine with a donation, but that it would not seem to be right to accept after the council chose to waive the fees.
Mike Corbally
9:38 pm on Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Tuesday night the Council made the decision to allow the Jenkinsons Corporation to refuse paying for officers required for their special events at the expense of the taxpayers. They are unwilling to fill out the applications required by law (that every other organization does), and a donation of $40,000 seems to have satisfied the majority of Council. As one lawyer said, "it doesn't even pass the smell test"!
Sean Hennessy
8:42 am on Thursday, April 21, 2011
Mike,
The council made the decision to not apply excessive fees on Jenkinsons Corp. You believe the events they have during the course of the season are "special events" and I see those events as part of their yearly activities. It is a difference of opinion between two council members. The current ordinance was clearly not intended for events such as father Alphonse concerts because no council has ever attempted to charge them fees for that event, including the council who put the ordinance on the books. Jenkinsons is unwilling to fill out the applications that you want them to fill out because they don't believe they are special events. As for the $40,000 donation to the police department that is a separate issue to the ordinance, although you and the mayor would like to somehow make the public believe the two issues are tied together. As for your last comment who is the lawyer you quoted ? I hope it is not who I think it is. I guess you are taking the approach the mayor has over the past three years and that is if you don't go along with you or don't agree with you than something smells or something is against the law. Pretty disappointing.
Beach_N8iv
10:57 am on Thursday, April 21, 2011
I guess somebody had a problem with my question. TYPICAL!
David Cavagnaro
12:39 pm on Thursday, April 21, 2011
Councilman Hennessy, the Council vote was not to avoid EXCESSIVE fees, it voted for NO FEES. This despite a list of police costs directly related to the events. Therefore those costs are now passed on to the taxpayers of PPB. Further, there was also the removal of the words “special events” from the resolutions.
The link of the “donation” and event fees as I recall was made by Jenkinson’s attorney, Mr. McGlynn and you. On more than one occasion you stated either that with the donation charging fees would be billing a second time for the same thing or that the donation covered the event fees. Even at the end of the meeting, during the public portion, when a Chamber member spoke regarding fees and applications that the Chamber pays and that Jenkinson’s should also, your response was that the $40,000 donation covers the fees.
With a world wide recession still in place, past practices no longer have merit. The town didn’t charge charitable institutions for special events. We do now because we cannot afford to absorb those costs. How do we charge nonprofits and exclude a profit based multimillion dollar corporation?
Dave Cavagnaro
Mike Corbally
10:37 pm on Thursday, April 21, 2011
Councilman Hennessey,
This Council had no problem changing a law that prohibited building east of the boardwalk. That was old. I believe the 1984 special event ordinance was before weekly beach concerts. When I believe the Council is not acting in the best interest of the taxpayers I will continue to voice my opinion. My opinion is just that, my opinion.
puppet watcher
12:57 am on Friday, April 22, 2011
Sean,
My question is, when they have the "big bands"here for memorial day weekend kickoff, Is that considered everyday business...I remember the "goo goo dolls"being here which has not happened since then,so is that exempt from filing an application...Just giving one example..There are many more like that but I would just like to know what the answer would be?