patching...
Breaking: Obama and Christie to Visit Jersey Shore on Tuesday »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Point Boro to Impose 33 Furlough Days for All Municipal Workers Except Police

Layoffs and service cuts still possible as boro grapples with 2 percent tax levy cap amid fiscal crisis

 

Point Pleasant Borough will impose 33 unpaid furlough days on all municipal employees except police, as it grapples with a fiscal crisis and a mess of 2010 financial records, Mayor William Schroeder said Monday.

The borough is prohibited by the state from furloughing police.

"We still have a long way to go," said Schroeder of the budget process. "It's been a challenge."

Councilman Chris Leitner, finance committee chairman, said recently, "This is easily the worst financial situation the borough has ever seen."

Layoffs and municipal service cutbacks also are possible as the borough begins to cobble together a new municipal budget, a process that has been delayed by months by shoddy record-keeping all of last year, according to an auditing firm that prepared an annual financial statement (see attached letter and statement under photos).

The financial statement, by Holman and Frenia, said the 2010 records, compiled by former Chief Financial Officer Judy Block, "were in complete disarray."

The "disarray" included "no bank reconciliations done for the entire year" and "a net amount of $3,691,375 was improperly posted or not posted to financial statements, including $49,858 in erroneous payroll charges," the statement says.

That amount of $3.6 million is more than the current total of assessed property in the borough, according to the statement. It says the borough reported to Ocean County in January that the net valuation of taxable property is $3,255,383.

Also, Block failed to record the entire municipal tax levy of $54 million, according to the statement.

"A major reconstruction of the records was necessary to complete the annual financial statement," according to the statement. "....General ledgers were not prepared, encumbrances weren't posted and internal controls weren't followed."

"Judy Block seems to have used a system of hieroglyphics that no one can seem to figure out," Schroeder said, referring to how Michelle A. Swisher, the borough's new part-time chief financial officer, and Business Administrator David Maffei are finding it challenging sorting out the records to figure out how much money the borough can apply to the next budget.

Thomas Fallon, a separate auditor, is analyzing the financial report to figure out how much money the borough actually has.

Schroeder and Leitner have each said in recent interviews that only after the audit is done will they know if the lack of financial accountability was merely gross negligence or if there is actually any money missing.

So it's unclear how much of the borough's dire budget picture is a result of the sloppy record keeping.

Schroeder, who became mayor in January, said budget decisions made during the past two years, under a prior administration, are also contributing heavily to the current crisis.

Block said on Tuesday that she retired in June from her full-time position, returned in August and left again in early December.

Although borough officials do not yet have the full budget picture, they have enough information to realize that at least some furlough days will be needed.

 The borough cannot raise municipal taxes more than 2 percent, as mandated by the state, with the exception of debt and pension payments, Maffei said.

And it's far too late for the borough to ask the state to allow a cap waiver, Maffei said. He said the borough would have had to introduce its budget by March to be permitted to ask the state for a cap waiver.

However, the borough still has not introduced a budget because it needed the financial and auditing work to reconstruct and examine last year's records.

 The council recently held budget workshop sessions to hear budget requests from department heads. The next budget workshop is scheduled for 7:30 p.m. Wednesday at Borough Hall.

There will be some discussion of department heads' capital budget requests at the regular council meeting at 7 p.m. Tuesday at Borough Hall.

The council had voted at a meeting last month to authorize its  finance committee to speak with the employees and bargaining units.

"Our hope is that we can find mutually agreeable solutions, perhaps even ideas we haven't contemplated yet," Leitner had said.

One of the many services the borough will have to plan carefully is collection of trash and recycling, all currently handled by private contractors.

The borough is contemplating having its public works employees provide those services and also weighing whether to continue twice-weekly pick-ups during the summer or to have weekly pick-ups all year.

"We are not pushing for any one option over another," Leitner said in a recent interview. "What we are doing is getting the pricing on all the options, from in-house trash collection to contracting trash collection out, so we can do a valid comparison and pick the best option for the borough."

Kelley

9:25 am on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

This is absolutely horrible for the Borough workers in Point Pleasant. Many of these workers do not make high salaries as it is, and to cut them this many days is a financial burdeon on our Point Pleasant families.

Reply

TaxedenoughinPPB

11:41 am on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Why is the whole burden falling on the employees except the police ? If the PD can't be furloughed then they should have layoffs. The layoffs should equal the amount of furlough days for the non police. Example : 1 million dollar deficit - police get cut 500k and non police get cut 500k.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

4:01 pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

And "The Bloc" wants to force a merger with this town?

vinny

12:43 pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

This is now the norm all over the state. We are told that the people that get furloughed should be happy they still have their jobs. They shoud be happy the mayor doesn"t laid off the bottom 25% of the boro workers. Yes the police should have to share in this cutback. Yes we do not need twice a week garbage pickup in the summer, and maybe we can save if the boro emploees start picking up th . But maybe the mayor and council should also give back their boro paychecks and health care perks and work for the betterment of the boro for free.
How many politicans frome either side are willing to do that? How much can we save there?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Laura

4:59 pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

They do not receive health care perks.

Spooner

1:40 pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Denise:
Judy Block retired on June 30, 2010 according to her statement here:http://boroindependent.com/2011/04/18/judy-block-responds-to-auditors-report/#comments

You wrote: " Also, Block failed to record the entire municipal tax levy of $54 million, according to the statement."

Her reply: ... after many requests, ergo $54,042,817 was not posted along with the other items relative to same because nothing had yet been provided to the Assessor by the County. I couldn’t post something that wasn’t there. I don’t make up the numbers. I asked the Tax Assessor for the information day-after-day right up until the very last day that I left. Her reply was that she had not been provided the numbers by the County...

Schroeder & Leitner are giving you their versions of the facts. . .I understand that Ms. Block has retained an attorney, which night explain her reluctance now to respond to your request. There's a lot more to this story. . . that involves politics . . . that doesn't belong in the day to day running of the government, as it pertains to the Edmunds &Associates municipal software, that has been an issue since early last year when Councilwoman Rogers bought it up. . . "This is nothing more than a political witch hunt to help sitting council members handle a challenging and dificult budget, forcing blame onto someone else." Block said. . .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Laura

5:01 pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Spooner since you posted with your opinion I will post the Administrative Law Judges opinion from when Ms. Block was brought up on charges.

Spooner

5:24 pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

What does that have to do with the article above . . .Here we are almost a year later and they still haven't completely implemented the Edmund's program. . . that's used by 3/4 of the New jersey municipalities. When Edmunds could take an entire county in Georgia and a month later, have their entire finances operating with the new software. . .Houston we have a problem. . . and it's at 2233 Bridge Avenue. . .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Laura

11:11 pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

The Edmund's sysem is history. They are back to the old system with no problems.

mar

10:02 pm on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

33 days is way too much. People don't realize how that can hurt a family unless it happens to you. Cutbacks should be found elsewhere.

Reply

Jeanne

6:12 am on Friday, May 20, 2011

What about our children that are involved with the rec program. If you had intentions of sending your child to camp this summer there will be no more Fridays. Camp will be Mon=Thurs. Likewise with Little Learners and Kinderschoold. There will be no school on Fridays. This is not fair to the children or parents that rely on the recreation department. If this "cut" affects you please come to the council meeting on Tuesday night at borough hall at 7:00.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Denise Di Stephan

7:29 am on Friday, May 20, 2011

The Borough Council meeting is a budget workshop scheduled for 5 to 7 p.m. Tuesday at Borough Hall. At 7 p.m. the Climate Action Committee meeting begins.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Point Pleasant Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks