One assailant, one person stabbed with "non-life threatening puncture wounds" but one assailant with an assault weapon with a thirty round magazine and 20 kids dead plus 7 adults. I am sorry but regulating guns and banning semi-automatic assault weapons, and large capacity magazines is reasonable and not the same as banning knives. Will gun advocates please stop comparing the two.

@ coolerhead. You really think banning guns will stop the violence? Tell me, how has that worked for cocaine and heroin? They are called criminals because they don't obey the law, period.

Read my post. I did not say ban all guns. I said regulate guns, and ban assault weapons and large capacity magazines. We cannot even discuss the regulating of guns without someone immediately saying that banning guns will not stop violence. Of course banning guns will not stop violence. However, refusing to consider regulating the sale of guns that were designed, not for hunting, or even for personal protection, but for the killing of a large number of people is not reasonable. We regulate automatic weapons, and they are rarely used in crimes because they are not available. They are not available because they are illegal nationwide, and therefore not available to even criminals. In states that large capacity magazines are illegal, people can still obtain them, by traveling to states like Virginia. If we had a nationwide ban, they would not be available. They are just too dangerous to be legal.

Where does it say the suspect or even the victim is from Brick?! The only thing about Brick in the story is the location of the Mansion (that's aside from a brick that apparently struck your head too perhaps)....