.

Mantoloking Hires Attorney for Potential Oceanfront Easement Fight

Condemnation now on the table as dune deadline looms; In Brick, easement language changes

With only a few holdouts expected to decline signing easements that will allow a federal dune and beach replenishment project to move forward, Mantoloking has hired an attorney to deal with those who refuse to cooperate.

Borough officials at a council meeting Tuesday said that eminent domain – the public taking of the easement parcels – will be on the table.

Council President Steve Gillingham described the four to five holdouts as "selfish and short-sighted" and said the borough will begin to consider legal action and – like Long Beach Township – will publicly release the names of those who do not sign by the borough's deadline, which is Friday.

The council voted in favor of hiring attorney Paul V. Fernicola, of Red Bank, to handle "prospective condemnation actions."

"It is in the public interest that that Borough be in a position to initiate such legal proceedings as may be necessary to acquire easements from those owners, if any, who are not willing to now grant the easement," a resolution to hire Fernicola said.

"We are still pushing extremely hard," said Chris Nelson, the borough's special counsel for storm recovery.

"All easements are due back April 26," said Nelson. "If not, then I'll be calling each oceanfront owner to see where it is, and if it's not in the mail, then we'll have to move forward."

Mantoloking was decimated by Superstorm Sandy in October, which damaged nearly every home in town. It was also the site of a dune breach which created a 20 foot-deep inlet at Herbert Street that is theorized to have flooded thousands of homes on Ocean County's northern barrier island as well as in mainland Brick Township across Barnegat Bay.

Many of the residents who were flooded in Point Pleasant Borough, as well as their elected council members, have also said they believe a lot of the local flooding was caused by the breach in Mantoloking and want to know what Mantoloking will do to help prevent that type of occurrence from happening in future storms.

Other Towns Also Dealing With Deadlines

As Mantoloking begins the process of putting itself in a tougher posture toward easement holdouts, neighboring towns are also feeling the pressure.

A May 1 easement deadline set by U.S. Rep. Jon Runyan (R-3) is only a week away, and there are still many easements yet to be signed in Brick and Toms River townships, which make up a large chunk of the northern barrier island.

In Lavallette, where the beach is entirely owned by the municipality, the borough has signed a single easement authorizing the project. Brick and Toms River also have likewise supported dune and beach replenishment for their public beaches.

In Brick, Mayor Stephen C. Acropolis said the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and state Department of Environmental Protection recently agreed to remove language in the easement documentation that called for the project to "implement the Public Trust Doctrine and ensure permanent public access, use and enjoyment of the beach and ocean."

That paragraph has been a sticking point for private property owners who did not want to see public access to their beaches.

Additionally, language in the easement documentation has changed to reflect that the easement can only be used for a specific dune renourishment project and maintenance – in effect, it could never be used by a future mayor or governor as license to install a boardwalk, bathrooms or other features.

"As the governor has said, he is going to make sure that easements are given, one way or another," said Acropolis.

bayboat April 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM
Hey holdouts!...its not like we didnt ask nice and say "please".... Sign or get the hell out of the way!
Mrs. G. April 24, 2013 at 10:52 AM
People with a "me first and only" attitude are not about to change in the face of a disaster. They need a legal push. Good for the council.
Peter Hagemeyer April 24, 2013 at 01:24 PM
The legal push should be Eminent Domain. I can't believe they red-lined public access. They're embezzling tax payer money for their own good- this is criminal.
proud April 24, 2013 at 07:00 PM
Room With a View Own God's Water Shakedown
Spooner April 24, 2013 at 09:50 PM
Lets see: there's only 4 posts on this patch thread, while the same story on the Brick patch has 3 times the number of posts??
proud April 25, 2013 at 12:35 PM
How many holdouts are in Pt. Pleasant?
proud April 25, 2013 at 08:27 PM
Financially your suggestion is not doable. Even if it were, the concrete you suggest would lessen the effectiveness of the sea wall
PPNB April 25, 2013 at 09:02 PM
Why please?
Spooner April 25, 2013 at 09:27 PM
proud- maybe I didn't make it clear enough: it has nothing to do with politics...it's a software glitch. I'll try to say it again: if you post on the Point Pleasant patch under the same byline, it will not appear on the Brick patch, and visa versa( that's Latin by the way)...
proud April 25, 2013 at 09:58 PM
Well, thanks for clearing that up. I think it is by design and not a software glitch. I'll try and bone up on my Latin. It's a tad rusty since Vatican II. Thanks for the help.
proud April 25, 2013 at 10:13 PM
Thief following except is from the Star Ledger Nov. 18th, 2012 quoting Dr. Stewart Farrell from Coastal Research Center in AC. FYI, the Bay Head wall cost $1,700 a foot. Take your tape measure down the road and compare it to your suggestion: "Sand dunes didn’t provide the only protection from the storm. Buildings behind sea walls did very well, depending on how well the walls were constructed. Farrell said the best sea walls use only boulders, which deflect wave action. For aesthetic reasons, some towns pour concrete over the boulders, rendering the walls much less effective against waves, he said. But sea walls aren’t practical financially. Beach replenishment costs about $10 million per mile of oceanfront, whereas sea walls would cost many more times that, Farrell said."
proud April 25, 2013 at 10:46 PM
Yes, but your suggested revettment is considerably larger and a one shot deal and doesn't address the concrete. Per the other thread I am now really done with you.
Mr. Happy April 25, 2013 at 11:58 PM
Spooner-It's actually vice versa, not "visa versa." Your welcome.
Richard Quiambao April 26, 2013 at 10:34 AM
Where are the dunes for Point Pleasant Beach? and who are the Holdouts?
john john May 24, 2013 at 06:03 PM
Council President Steve Gillingham, "Will publicly release the names of those who do not sign by the borough's deadline, which is Friday". Wow now the government now has a new job description. "The Gestapo government". I mean, now the government can release the names of people that will not conform to their ideals...unreal. We have crossed a line. And the govt. wants to know why people do not trust the govt when it comes to gun registration, IRS, GSA, TSA, ATF, and on and on. Now I do not agree with the hold-outs, but this is not mother Russia. Lets stop the strong arm tactics and use the law not govt intimidation.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something