.

District 4 Parking Plan Coming Back Friday

District 3 parking plan narrowly gets council's preliminary approval; final adoption for that part of plan is scheduled for July 30

Dave Cavagnaro was all smiles after Tuesday night's council meeting, his first as a council member, when the District 4 parking plan was re-established.
Dave Cavagnaro was all smiles after Tuesday night's council meeting, his first as a council member, when the District 4 parking plan was re-established.
The parking plan restricting non-resident parking during overnight, summer hours in parts of Districts 4 will go back into effect on Friday, based on a Point Beach Council vote at the end of a long Tuesday night (July 9) meeting.

A vote to adopt an ordinance, on second reading, to re-establish the summer, overnight parking plan that was in place until a few weeks ago in most of District 4, starting south of Broadway, was passed nearly unanimously by council.

The only council member not actually voting for it was Councilmember Kristine Tooker, who, at the suggestion of Mayor Vincent Barrella, did not vote because she was attending the meeting via teleconference and Barrella had a concern about a legal challenge being raised regarding the legitimacy of her vote while she was not physically present in the meeting room in Borough Hall.

A separate vote for first reading of an ordinance to re-establish the parking plan in a small section of District 3 was far less amicable. Councilmembers Stephen Reid, Andy Cortes and William Mayer voted against it, new Councilmember Dave Cavagnaro, along with Councilmembers Bret Gordon and Tooker voted for it.

Barrella told Tooker, "We're going to have to roll the dice with Grasso and Gasiorowski. You'll have to vote on this one, Kris." Tooker then voted and Barrella cast a yes vote to break the tie.

The first reference was to Superior Court Judge Vincent Grasso, who ruled in mid June that Michael Corbally had a conflict of interest as a councilman when he voted for the parking plan because he is a Realtor in District 4. Corbally resigned as a councilman the day after learning of the Grasso ruling.

Ronald Gasiorowski is the attorney representing the plaintiffs who brought a suit against Corbally and a separate suit against the town for passing the parking plan. Gasiorowski also represents Martell's Tiki Bar in its federal court suit against the parking plan.

After the meeting, Municipal Clerk Maryann Ellsworth said that while the Borough Public Works department may begin to put the parking plan signs back up as early as Wednesday, the ordinance re-establishing the parking plan in District 4 cannot go into effect until it is published in a weekly newspaper that is sold on news stands Thursday and mailed to subscribers' homes by Friday.

Ellsworth said she expects the police department to begin enforcing the parking plan in affected sections of Districts 4 on Friday.

The second reading and adoption of the District 3 parking plan is scheduled for July 30.

A number of residents at the June 25 council meeting, as well as the one held Tuesday night, spoke in favor of the parking plan being put back in both districts, as they were before Grasso's ruling invalidated the plan.

Because Grasso's criticism was directed only at what he termed Corbally's conflict of interest, and not at the legal validity of the parking plan itself, the council felt it was able to re-establish the plan.

Most of the debate regarding the parking plan ordinances centered not so much on the merits of the ordinances, but on differing opinions about whether Mayer has a conflict of interest.

In a long, heated exchanged, Barrella insisted that Mayer does have a conflict because Mayer's brother in law, Chip Di Corcia, works as Director of Security for Martell's, which is suing the town over the parking plan.

Barrella said that while he disagrees with Grasso's opinion about Corbally, he said that if that ruling is overlaid onto the scenario with Mayer, DiCorcia and the pending Martell's lawsuit, that would mean, using Grasso's logic, that Mayer has a conflict of interest.

Mayer said he has researched the question, that his voting on the matter does not violate any ethics laws and that the mayor's criticism of him was "unprofessional."

Mayer also said, before the votes were cast, that he intended on voting for the District 4 parking plan ordinance and that the mayor had raised the challenge against him "for nothing."

"But according to Judge Grasso's opinion, it doesn't matter how you vote, don't you understand that?" Barrella said to Mayer. "You are contaminating this vote and I have to wonder why."

Municipal Attorney Sean Gertner said that while he has found there is no legal conflict with Mayer voting on the parking plan, he said it's important for all council members to publicly disclose any relationships or matters that could even be construed as a conflict of interest, to "look inward" and to vote in the way they believe best represents the general public.

He quoted a judge who had opined that elected officials will fall out of public favor if the public perceives they are casting votes for reasons not in the best interest of the public.

This story was originally posted on the night of July 9, after council took the vote for the parking plan.

The Real World July 16, 2013 at 05:56 PM
VB: I notice you have no answer to the post below so I thought I'd repeat it. Something the folks need to know, don't you think? VB: It is not about businesses’ interests over residents’ interests. It’s about what was the right way to deal with the issues caused by the under funding of the police department during your administration. You resorted to vendetta politics, fueled by the fact that you blame the BW businesses for the recall. You tried to bully the BW with your bar closing ordinance. The rest of us thought you should have made the deal. True leadership would have taken that first step towards working with our biggest businesses; instead we are left with a festering wound.
Mr. Happy July 16, 2013 at 09:50 PM
Hey Proud: I'm sitting here watching the All-Star game on the porch with the "gin sot, porch monkey, gorillas" you so eloquently have described as the people of PPB. After the Klan meeting is over down there in your town of Lacey, stop over for a drink. We'll save you some 40's and ripple, because that is what you think us "porch monkeys" drink, don't you?
proud July 16, 2013 at 10:30 PM
I would imagine. I'm watching the game too, sans the green label. Enjoy the bender, @ hap.
proud July 16, 2013 at 10:43 PM
Fact Sheet for vince brie: 1. You got your butt kicked in court at taxpayer expense. 2. Your appeal will cost the taxpayers a boat load of cash though you got your ordinance. 3. You have whined incessantly since your loss. 4. Your poster boy for less than ethical behavior is a formidable challenger in the whine department. 5. Your administration has divided the community via political party lines. 6. Your administration has divided the community by geographic subsets. 7. You have made cruel, crude and insensitive comments in reference to the disabled and your foot is lodged firmly in your mouth.
Mike Corbally July 16, 2013 at 11:10 PM
Proud are you capable of being constructive in your criticism? I'd love to hear some ideas that municipalities have the ability to change to make things better for the taxpayers?
proud July 16, 2013 at 11:40 PM
No problem @Mike. The most beneficial thing municipalities could do to make things better for taxpayers would be to cease to exist. I don't see that happening at any time on the near future. In light of that reality, the next most beneficial thing municipalities could do to benefit the taxpayers is rid themselves of ethically challenged elected officials. e g: unstack the deck!
Mike Corbally July 16, 2013 at 11:55 PM
I agree with the deck being stacked. I don't like it either. It is the best system in the world. Unfortunately money and power will always have the final say. Federal, state, county and local governments all chase the dollar. We must trust the electorate and work within the system.
Jersey Shore Grinch July 17, 2013 at 09:06 AM
I guess Proud wants to go to a county system like they have in Florida. Two words about that. George Gilmore. Talk about chasing the $$$$$. Must be too much radiation from Oyster Creek affecting that boy. Stick with the issues at hand. The Grasso decision goes bye-bye 10 minutes after it reaches Trenton.
Jersey Shore Grinch July 17, 2013 at 09:36 AM
I'll be the first. The Grinch endorses Corbally in the next election.
Mr. Happy July 17, 2013 at 09:39 AM
Mike C.- It's good to see you keeping your name on the ballot. There is a real groundswell of support, and that will increase greatly if the appeal is successful. I'm sure that concerns the (R), hopefully their tentacles don't reach the judiciary, because you know they will try to stall the appeal past the election. P.S.- I wouldn't waste any time with 'proud.' His constructive criticism consists of name calling, hate speech and abolishment of government. He adds nothing.
proud July 17, 2013 at 10:01 AM
Spoken like a true drunken sheep.
Mr. Happy July 17, 2013 at 10:04 AM
Thanks for making my point- proud!
Jersey Shore Grinch July 17, 2013 at 10:05 AM
The Grasso decision getting overturned is about as certain as Reid saying or doing something stupid in the next 30 days. Guaranteed!
proud July 17, 2013 at 10:07 AM
You're welcome hap. See between innings if you're not too sleepy.
Jersey Shore Grinch July 17, 2013 at 10:11 AM
In November it's either Corbally and this fellow Davis or the two boardwalk shills. Vogel is a retread and Ratatoohey was indoctrinated to the boardwalk style of life from a young age. He'll approve the high rises and new bars in about 2 seconds. I'll take the prospects of higher property values as opposed to Keansburg any day. Corbally and Davis for me.
proud July 17, 2013 at 10:11 AM
Grinchie, there are no certainties in a courtroom. It will be a long time and a whole lot of tax dollars pissed away before a conclusion in this matter.
proud July 17, 2013 at 10:18 AM
Problem being Grinchie is that there under the thumb of the pantsted one.
The Real World July 17, 2013 at 10:19 AM
Corbally has no chance on the appeal as long as he has the same lawyer who lost the bar closing suit and the parking suit. all that guy knows how to do is spend taxpayer dollars and kiss Barrella a##. And there is no chance Grasso will be overturned
Jersey Shore Grinch July 17, 2013 at 10:27 AM
A kid who did moot court in high school could win this one. Even as loony as you are you could probably argue this one successfully if you would lay off the anti-government Kool-Aid for 5 minutes. This isn't about Barrella. It's about looking out for the residents for once.
The Real World July 17, 2013 at 10:33 AM
But JSG you moved out of town. You are not really going to vote here after moving, are you?
proud July 17, 2013 at 10:39 AM
Was that directed at me @Grinchie or @Real World?
The Real World July 17, 2013 at 11:28 AM
I'll be happy to take that one proud. JSG - Nonsense. If Corbally was interested in the residents he would not be wasting taxpayer dollars to get back on council. Only the Barrella shills imagine that their political opponents don't put residents (a group to which all belong) first. Like I said before, the issue isn't residents v. businesses; the issue is Barrlla's litigation causing bully tactics v. discussion and mutually beneficial agreement. Like, say, taking the 800K offered.
Jersey Shore Grinch July 17, 2013 at 01:10 PM
Both. 2 idiots for the price of 1.
proud July 17, 2013 at 01:16 PM
Grinchie, baby, I know you don't like brie, but you were just cheer leading for the ethically challenged. Why would you refer to him that way?
proud July 17, 2013 at 02:30 PM
Hey, @hap, when you get up from your morning stupor, answer this for me:Do you really think the appeal will be dedided prior to November? If you think that report immediately to de-tox. You might want to consider that, anyhoo.
proud July 17, 2013 at 02:34 PM
@Grinchie, baby, using your logic, the attorney/s that represented the Borough had legal skill sets inferior to that of a kid in a high school moot court. Scary! Will the powers that be use the same counsel on appeal? Just wondering. Thought you might know because you know-- well, everything.
Mr. Happy July 17, 2013 at 04:26 PM
Enough bickering! It's time to take a break and play that old favorite, Mr. Happy's Poll! The subject is words throughout history. The following words have been used infamously to describe a certain group of people: "porch monkey," "drunken porch monkey," "gin swillers swinging like gorillas." The question is, who has used these words? A. James Earl Ray. B. Byron De La Beckwith. C. Patch Blogger "proud" from Lacey. D. Nathan Bedford Forrest. E. All of the above. Take a moment (cue Jeopardy music).........................................................................................................The answer is...............E. All of the above. Thanks for playing.
The Real World July 17, 2013 at 04:41 PM
JSG - Nonsense. If Corbally was interested in anything other than Barrella’s agenda, he would not be wasting taxpayer dollars to get back on council. Only the Barrella shills imagine that their political opponents don't put residents (a group to which all belong) first. Like I said before, the issue isn't residents v. businesses; the issue is Barrlla's litigation causing bully tactics v. discussion and mutually beneficial agreement. Like, say, taking the 800K offered.
Mr. Happy July 17, 2013 at 04:45 PM
Hi proud - congrats on making the poll. Anyway, in reference to your 10:18AM post to Grinch - is there an English translation? Not only does it not make sense, you are now using words that don't exist. Just curious. But the good news is, it's material for my next poll. Thanks! Oops, gotta go, almost cocktail hour!!
proud July 17, 2013 at 05:14 PM
@hap, welcome back. I'm going to have to get you before round two with the porch gorillas and the Giacobazzi. You really are a pip with your poll. I just couldn't stop laughing . You're too cute. However, I don't think you'd be able to cite your sources. In any event, I'm certain that the mentioned are better company than the miscreants that spend their lives in your company at the bottle of a bottle. I'm going to have to apologize to you twice @hap. Once, for my fat fingers ,and,once for not proof reading. Please don't sick the grammar police on me. I mistakingly typed pantsted (which I suppose is common slang anyhoo) when I meant to type pantsed, which of course is the simple past tense or past participle of pants. The reference I was alluding to was made earlier in this thread from the crowned prince of the chill pill @Grinchie, when he asserted that Vince brie doesn't wear the pants in his his fam. Just a guess, but I believe the inference was that the emperor is sans his clothes or got caught with his pants down, or something to that effect. Thanks for keeping me honest with spelling and for the chuckle. You really are a card. That poll was hysterical. Can't wait for the next one. I hope I can contain myself. Feel free to slur on by later.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something