.
Feedback

Dunes or Doomed? Protection of Dunes is Critical

Protecting our dunes in critical to reduce the impacts of future storms on people and property.

Dunes are vitally important to the coast of New Jersey.  They protect against beach erosion, provide habitats for all types of species, and just as important protect property from storms and storm surges. Those places that have had intact dunes fare much better in storms like Hurricane Sandy than places that do not.

However, New Jersey has not maintained dunes properly in many areas of the state and in other areas dunes are not even required. Now we see the consequences of those actions. Nature may have brought the storms, but the failure to protect our dunes made the damage worse in some places.

In order to receive money for beach replenishment and dune replacements towns must provide public access.  Unfortunately some communities would rather have no dunes than provide adequate beach access.  Under the revised Beach Access Rules, the towns can now draft their own municipal plans to provide access with no standards and no enforcement if the access is not provided.  Municipalities have also rejected dunes because they did not want to block views. 

We have also allowed some towns to do beach replenishment and widen beaches without building dunes. We have even allowed towns to cut down their dunes so that beach bars can have better views of the water.

We have seen property owners challenge dunes because either they do not want the public on the beach or they do not want their views blocked.  There was a case in Long Beach Island where property taxes were reduced because dunes blocked their view.  In March a case in Harvey Cedars took this a step further with the home owners not only asking for property taxes reductions due to dunes but actually suing for compensation for the dunes being close to their property. 

LBI has been one of the hardest hit areas because they do not have dunes.  Long Beach Township did not have dunes in places because they did not want to provide beach access.  About 300 people came out to testify against the revised Beach Access Rules in Long Beach Township last summer. The only person who spoke in favor of these rules was the mayor.

Areas such as Long Beach that were hit the hardest will be looking for more federal disaster relief to rebuild when they actually brought it on themselves. We have a system that rewards bad planning and actions by government and citizens because the places that failed to do what was right want more money to fix what they did wrong. 

Now as we rebuild our dunes using public money there has to be public access. We cannot allow towns to use public money to rebuild dunes, and turn around and deny the public access to beaches or waterways.

In the last 20 years, the federal government has given New Jersey close to $500 million to do beach replenishment.  The state of New Jersey has spent another $500 million. We have seen around $1 billion dollars worth of sand wash away with the last storm. It will take a lot of public  money to restore our beaches and restore the dunes and public access must come along with that investment.

A recent appellate division court has ruled in the favor of dune protection.  In MULLEN and LEVINE v. THE IPPOLITO CORPORATION and POINT PLEASANT BEACH, the court singled out Point Pleasant Beach for failing to protect its dunes.  The court ruled that it is the responsibility of the town to protect the dunes and enforce its dune protection ordinance.  Dunes were allowed to be damaged, destroyed, erode and disappear. The town did not do enough to protect the dunes from overdevelopment. With this case in Point Pleasant the court is defending the value of the dunes for protecting property and providing important environmental benefits.

We now need the New Jersey Legislature to pass legislation on dune protection since we now have the opportunity to implement good planning along our coastal areas to better protect people and property from future disasters.

Now towns are trying to rebuild the community and beaches by looking for public money. The state of New Jersey has to change its policies either at the DEP or through the Legislature. We need legislation that requires protection and maintenance of dunes as well as providing public access when towns receive beach replacement money. Otherwise we are going to be waving goodbye to more money and sand next time there is a storm.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Point Pleasant Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Jesse James November 19, 2012 at 09:12 pm
The cell phone thing may be a hoax but barry is definitely one sneaky lil kenyan muslim!
John Mullen November 19, 2012 at 11:25 pm
Its also very interesting to note that the Borough of Point Pleasant Beach has decided to appeal the Mullen/Levine v. Ippolito ruling from the Appellate Division to the NJ Supreme Court. The borough is clearly in denial about the dune ordinance and other issues the court dealt with in this ruling. What a great idea? Use taxpayer money to continue litigation rather than admit a mistake, suck it up and deal with it.
John E November 19, 2012 at 11:55 pm
People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones..and people who live near the water should have flood insurance.
PPB0982 November 20, 2012 at 12:19 am
The Point Beach Environmental Commission apparently has a dune inspector. What has been done to protect the dunes, and therefore the homeowners? Instead of fining people for cutting down trees, which I'm sure they'll try to do if they don't replant storm damaged ones, why don't they do something to actually enforce the dune issue.
John Mullen November 20, 2012 at 12:55 am
PPB0982 Could not agree more! The issue was advanced formally in 2009 in the litigation. The Appellate court characterized the dune inspector as "A Beach Watcher" that reported what he saw to borough employees.
John Mullen November 20, 2012 at 12:55 am
Was not bitching merely stating facts.
John Mullen November 20, 2012 at 12:57 am
I have flood insurance and I will not be needing to file a claim. The real question is FEMA giving out money to people that don't have flood insurance. While I agree people need help just where are those costs passed on to the taxpayer and what will happen to the cost of flood insurance for people that do buy it?
John Mullen November 20, 2012 at 01:06 am
^Neither does trolling.
John Mullen November 20, 2012 at 01:09 am
For the troll, agree yes it does!
~Barb~ November 21, 2012 at 07:07 pm
It's a catch 22. If the landowners have their say, they charge fees for access. If the state oversees the beaches is paves the way for eminent domain,"sustainable development" and NOBODY gets to use the beaches.
Don Smith November 29, 2012 at 05:45 am
My place was just south of the Thunderbird. They put bulk heading in front of their place. It caused the build up of energy in the waves to eat our large very healthy dune system. While there is no dune in place I would like to see bulk heading installed to protect the existing house line on the beach and then let the dunes grow over the PVC bulkhead. It may be 50 years till we need it but it will be there.
KC November 29, 2012 at 06:12 am
pee in the wind lol George. Your point is taken though.
KC November 29, 2012 at 06:13 am
Still Ignorant and rascist.
Spooner November 29, 2012 at 06:18 am
Really- your getting to be a little bit of a drag with the snide remarks. Mr Mullen did do something besides complain to town hall...
http://njlaw.rutgers.edu/collections/courts/appellate/a5823-10.opn.html PS: while your mouthing off...maybe you can write the Governor and the Dept of Social Services as to why they had no dune protection for their two ocean front properties that became part of the Atlantic Ocean just north of Herbert St. Now if your not familiar with Herbert St. . .that is the road that led onto the Mantoloking Bridge...
KC November 29, 2012 at 06:24 am
Well I have also observed owners who allow their dogs to shite on the beach and look the other way! (Mantaloking). Some owners are slobs too and again, you can't own a beach property. People in general are inconsiderate polluters and owning or not owning a property has little to do with it.
KC November 29, 2012 at 06:26 am
Seriously I wish I would have just saved all the money I spent in premiums. I am not in a flood zone, but becasue I am close I always kept a policy. From what I am hearing if I had to have put in a claim I would have recieved little to nothing.
KC November 29, 2012 at 06:31 am
Yah right - that is why inurance agents went in and changed their policy deductibles at the last second before Sandy hit - because they are such honest, scrupulous people. IMO they belong in the same tier of hell as lawyers and bankers.
KC November 29, 2012 at 06:34 am
People were fined for cutting down trees? Please explain.
Slippery Slope December 4, 2012 at 11:13 pm
And a house divided against itself, cannot stand.
Stan Walker December 12, 2012 at 12:56 pm
Concrete seawalls.
shorefriend December 12, 2012 at 01:44 pm
CORRECTION: Bayhead and Mantoloking are definitely not accessible!!! Tell me where you parked? I read an opinion for a resident of Bayhead this summer that said he encouraged all of his neighbors to park on the streets so that no non-residents could come to the beach!!
Bowie Thelonius December 12, 2012 at 01:48 pm
Barrier islands will always take a pounding in storms. They are after all, barriers.
Bowie Thelonius December 12, 2012 at 01:50 pm
Sounds like you're getting off pretty cheaply. My house is worth about 300,000 and I'm paying over 6K/year.
shorefriend December 12, 2012 at 01:52 pm
Very good and informative post!! Interesting article, that makes a valid point.
Bowie Thelonius December 12, 2012 at 01:54 pm
Since I'm freaking old, I remember when most of the shore towns (like the one I grew up in), only had small bungalows and shanty-like houses near the beach. If they roof blew off in a storm, no biggie. Now, with multi-million dollars houses so close to the ocean, it is a big deal when they get destroyed. People have to realize the ocean, and mother nature, will always win.
wookfish December 12, 2012 at 02:23 pm
Like Sea Bite? built with public monies and NO public access..
John Mullen December 12, 2012 at 03:25 pm
Seawalls work for protecting property behind them, however, they destroy the beach. An excellent read on this is the book "Corps and the Shore" by Orrin Pilkey.
John Mullen December 12, 2012 at 03:28 pm
Your right and you know a major contribution to the build up was the availability of flood insurance starting in the late 1960's. Prior to that it was build at your own risk so people built smaller houses. I often wonder if a ban on the issuance of new flood policies or a cancellation of the program is in order.
Donald December 12, 2012 at 04:51 pm
You certainly raise a valid point about the influence of FEMA-backed flood insurance on building in flood-prone areas. However, when talking about "multi-million-dollar" beach houses, keep in mind there is a limit of $250K in coverage on the structure (with a $2K deductible). So the owner still has a lot of "skin in the game."
John Mullen December 12, 2012 at 05:06 pm
Its true Donald, $250,000 on the structure and $100,000 for contents. But without flood insurance can you get a mortgage? I don't think you can and it certainly is required for a mortgage right now.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kathleen Ann Hagel May 25, 2013 at 03:27 am
Way to go my peanut butter crunch!!!!
Joseph Cutrone May 25, 2013 at 12:33 pm
Dear Cass, This is Dads friend Joey In Florida. and i am SO proud of you! CONGRATS on this and ALLRead More your future "gigs" cant wait to see your name in broadway lights and I KNOW you will do it! Joey