.
Feedback

Rebuilding After Hurricane Sandy

As we rebuild after Hurricane Sandy, we must do it in a way that does not put people and property in harm's way yet again.

Hurricane Sandy forever changed what the Jersey Shore will look like.  Our hearts go out to all of those impacted and we will rebuild one of the most important areas of our state. We must and we will rebuild after Hurricane Sandy.  However we need to do it better, smarter, and in the right places. 

When we rebuild we must ensure it is done in a way to keep families out of harm’s way and to reduce the likelihood that such a loss of lives and property could happen again in the future.  It is important for our economy to rebuild the right way because these storms will keep coming.  As we recover from Hurricane Sandy we need to put in place good planning and land use policies that protect our families from the impacts of climate disruption and sea level rise. 

There are areas that have been damaged that we need to rebuild such as Atlantic City and Asbury Park, but we need to do it the right way.  We cannot allow more growth in flood prone areas and must limit development upstream of those areas.  We need to do a better job managing stormwater and preventing combined sewer overflows.  Certain areas we should buy out or let them rebuild somewhere else because they are too vulnerable to flooding and storm surges.  New Jersey now has the opportunity to implement good planning along our coastal areas to better protect people and property from future disasters.  

We need to stop using public money to subsidize development in the wrong places.  Disaster relief must not keep using taxpayer money to rebuild the same house again and again in the wrong location.  Instead they should be giving them money to rebuild somewhere else.

Our open space fund is out of money so we will not be able to purchase many of these sites through the Blue Acres Program, which helps move families out of harm’s way.  We could have preserved lands to create more dunes and areas for flood water storage but now those opportunities will be lost.   We need to restore natural system like flood plains ans wetlands to mitigate the impacts of these storms.

Many of the areas impacted by Hurricane Sandy are slated for more growth under the Governor’s State Strategic Plan and under coastal regulations such as Lacey, Stafford, and Toms River.  In the regulated coastal zone in Ocean County we could add 200,000 more people based on existing regulations.  An additional 100,000 people could be added to Lakewood as well, more than doubling Ocean County’s population. 

As we rebuild we need to revise our building codes so structures stand up better to higher winds and flooding.  We need to build further back from flood prone areas and the dunes and also make sure we elevate not only houses but key infrastructure.  We should be promoting more green homes and energy efficient buildings when we rebuild as well.

Maintaining the character of the communities is critical as we rebuild.  This must not become an excuse to put high rise luxury housing in areas that were once small bungalows.  We hope the Jersey Shore continues to be the Jersey Shore.

We also need to do a better job restoring and protecting dunes along our coast.  DEP needs to enforce coastal violations, especially with development in the wrong places and that encroaches on dunes.  Dunes are critically important for property protection and the environment, especially during storm surges.

New Jersey continues to promote development in flood prone and wetland areas, which makes the consequences of weather events more extreme and places more people in harm’s way.  As a result of Hurricane Irene oil leaks, chromium pollution, toxic waste from chemical plants along rivers, raw sewage, and polluted stormwater runoff entered our waterways.  We need to not only limit development but we need development with less pavement and impervious cover and not allow hazardous facilities in flood prone areas. 

While FEMA has developed new maps that show how flooding impacting are now further reaching, Governor Christie has not adopted those more protective maps.  The administration has failed to upgrade FEMA mapping because they do not want to limit development in those areas. By not fixing those maps people do not know they live in flood prone areas and do not get flood insurance, costing the tax payers more money.

Governor Christie weakened land use tools within the DEP that prevent sprawl in flood prone and wetland areas.  His administration has rolled back the stormwater and flood hazard rules, removing key protections. 

Governor Christie has stopped progress made under previous administrations on adaptation to climate change and sea level rise and hazard planning.  Important studies on impacts to the Delaware Bay Shore and protecting critical infrastructure across the state have been buried by the Christie administration.  Governor Christie even eliminated the Office of Climate Change which played a role producing the reports.  

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome.  As we rebuild the Jersey Shore we need to do it in a way that better protects life, property, and environmentally sensitive areas and maintains the character of the local community.  We cannot continue placing our neighbors in harm’s way.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Point Pleasant Patch? Find your Local Patch »

firedup49 November 21, 2012 at 02:36 am
Agenda 21 by another name Smart Growth, Sustainable Open spaces, walkable communities. Can be checked out go to the source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21
also you can get the UN book from Amazon, Agenda 21: Earth Summit: The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio United Nations (Author) http://www.amazon.com/Agenda-21-Summit-Nations-Programme/dp/9211005094/ref=sr_1_11?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1353464820&sr=1-11&keywords=agenda+21 I heard about this 3yrs ago, also knowing it is about eminent domain. Just think about the land grab of Shackamaxon they tried by changing the property to a redevelopment I know it sounds crazy, just find out and verify yourself
Monk November 21, 2012 at 10:26 am
This just in:
"The Central Intelligence Agency has disbanded its Center on Climate Change and National Security, a unit formed in 2009 to monitor the interplay between a warming planet and intelligence and security challenges. ... '[The center] was unnecessary, wasteful and totally out of place. It’s critically important for the C.I.A. to focus its resources on preventing terrorism and keeping Americans safe.'" Well, this is heartening. Now if we can help a few others realize what an unnecessary and wasteful distraction this climate change business is ....
frank reynolds November 24, 2012 at 06:08 am
i love this fired up bozo . agenda 21 was a wacky idea allen west thought up to scare old people in florida. it says the enviormentalists will form an army and throw all of us from our homes using eminent domain and throw us all in work camps. it also states that the enviormentalists will also destroy the constitution because no teabagger conspiracy isnt complete without the constitution being torn up. allen west got the boot on election day and agenda 21 is just another mel gibson mad max beyond thunderdome movie. sadly there are still plenty of hannity drones out there like fed up who still fall for this nonsense.yeah monk " this just in" 99% of the scientists in this world who know climate change is real have all agreed you are full of it. ask the people who lost their homes in the biggest storm of the century if they think its a myth.
westpark November 26, 2012 at 02:34 am
All arguments go out the window when we all built to FEMA requirements and it still flooded...
Steve November 26, 2012 at 03:01 am
This just in . . . here's more from the same news, which was intentionally deleted by Mr. Monk (thus revealing his true agenda):
"The creation of the office drew fire at the time from some Republicans, who said it was an unnecessary expense and a distraction from the agency’s focus on terrorism and other more immediate threats. The agency did not say whether the closing was related to budget constraints or other political pressures. Todd Ebitz, a C.I.A. spokesman, said that the agency would continue to monitor the security and humanitarian challenges posed by climate change as part of its focus on economic security, but not in a stand-alone office. “ 'The C.I.A. for several years has studied the national security implications of climate change,” Mr. Ebitz said in an e-mailed statement. “As part of a broader realignment of analytic resources, this work continues to be performed by a dedicated team in a new office that looks at economic and energy matters affecting America’s national security. The mission and the resources devoted to it remain essentially unchanged.'”
Steve November 26, 2012 at 03:02 am
And here's the complete news-report quote corresponding to Mr. Monk's misleadingly cropped "quote" that was unduly critical of the CIA's climate-change monitoring:
"Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming, has been the most vocal critic of the C.I.A.’s climate change work. He welcomed the closing of its office. “Closing the Climate Change Center at the C.I.A. was the right decision,” Mr. Barrasso said in a statement. “I offered an amendment on the Senate floor to eliminate the center because it was unnecessary, wasteful and totally out of place. It’s critically important for the C.I.A. to focus its resources on preventing terrorism and keeping Americans safe.” " So the cropped source of the quoted disparagement of the CIA's work was only John Barrasso, a conservative senator from Wyoming (which has a very high carbon footprint from its oil and gas production), who has voted with the Republicans 94% of the time, who received an "A" from the NRA for his political views, and who introduced a bill just last year that would have prevented the government from controlling the emission of pollutants such as carbon dioxide (widely produced by his principal political donors in Wyoming). Barrasso's bill died in Congress (as did his proposed amendment to eliminate the CIA's climate-change work).
Guarda Sikh November 30, 2012 at 02:27 am
@ Patrick - Seems that you yourself spend an inordinate amount of time and effort squabbling on other people's comments. Got a PhD? Part of the "intellectual core" whatever the heck that is?
Guarda Sikh November 30, 2012 at 02:30 am
@ Patrick - Again. What is your PhD?
Patrick November 30, 2012 at 02:34 am
@Guarda Sikh It is quite simple... When people toss out opinion that runs in the face of every scientific reality based on what... a wish? a hope? what? yes that is sarcasm, when I say that AOL has marketed this site to the intelligent persons on the internet.
so there you go. is that all you have issue with?
Patrick November 30, 2012 at 02:40 am
@Guarda Sikh if you read what I have written I have said I defer to the experts in the field. Even the World Bank just released a report about the world wild effect of climate change, focusing on costal areas... so NO I never said i was an expert. I stated the climate change experts all agree. So. if you have an issue with me, fine. if you have a problem with me having an issue with climate change deniers, then prove me wrong.
frank reynolds December 1, 2012 at 08:35 am
someone sober up project bluebeam and let him know in this week's news the reports are the artic ice at both poles is melting 3 times faster now than it was in the 1990s. bluebeam has no clue it took thousands upon thousands of years for the glaciers to decline not a decade.sad part is the kids today will suffer for bluebeam's ignorance and regurgitation of the "facts" he has seen on the fox channel. fox news who always get it right. i mean they said romney was going to win by a landslide. how did all of that work out?
Steve December 10, 2012 at 02:10 am
Fun fact for the day:
According to a June Gallup report, most Republicans (58 percent) believed that God created humans in their present form within the last 10,000 years. Most Democrats and independents did not agree. Res ipsa loquitur.
frank rizzo December 10, 2012 at 02:24 am
steve they think the flintstones was a documentary
Barney December 10, 2012 at 03:11 am
Yes, but meanwhile our beloved Obama and his beautiful wife spent 20 years listening to Reverend Wright and how evil the white man is.
LOL.
frank rizzo December 10, 2012 at 03:14 am
yes barney because of course that has everything to do with climate change. you know when barney starts to thinking you can literally see the smoke coming from the back of his head. lol
Barney December 10, 2012 at 03:23 am
Stop embarrassing yourself with the illiterate hieroglyphics.
frank rizzo December 10, 2012 at 04:10 am
how long did it take you to look up that word barney?
frank rizzo December 10, 2012 at 04:11 am
speaking of science barney is living proof that darwin was right.
KC December 10, 2012 at 05:05 am
An entire world summit disagrees with you. Should we take your word over the scientific community from all over the world? Stop buying Chinese crap from Walmart and adding more hot air to the planet lol.
KC December 10, 2012 at 05:07 am
Make them reuse their tea bags.
KC December 10, 2012 at 05:08 am
You can and do when you shop at walmartians
BN December 10, 2012 at 11:26 am
Open your eyes to what's going on in the universe and stop trying to profiteer and control people!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEo3PBaVha8&sns=em
Khalid Bin Abdel Rehman Al-Hussainan December 10, 2012 at 02:59 pm
If the NRA is backing a politician then you should vote for them. You liberals are tools.
Steve December 10, 2012 at 03:07 pm
The YouTube video linked in the preceding comment was produced by an anonymous person, who goes by "Suspicious0bservers." It is totally lacking in ANY scientific peer review, the hallmark and gold standard of good science.
The linked video is typical of the sort of specious junk that most climate-change Deniers rely on, especially on venues such as this one. At least with regard to the ill-informed talk-radio entertainment industry, we know the source of the specious junk (flatly rejected by ALL reputable scientific organizations in this country). BTW, NASA has rejected the notion that the Sun is responsible for the Earth's warming over the last century, finding that the emission of solar energy has in fact decreased over that period of time. NASA, like virtually ALL other well-respected scientific organizations in the United States, has concluded that global warming is indeed caused, in large measure, by the accumulation of manmade greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere.
Khalid Bin Abdel Rehman Al-Hussainan December 10, 2012 at 03:27 pm
Patrick and Steve are the same person and an idiot.
Tim O C December 10, 2012 at 04:03 pm
yeah moonbeam because slave labor in china and 3rd world countries like it is much better for the bottom line oh you christian conservatives are a funny bunch of hypocrites
BN December 11, 2012 at 12:28 am
Hey Steve, I guess all the links to legitimate data that Suspicious0bservers provides with each and every video is too much for you to stomach, huh?
BN December 11, 2012 at 12:32 am
"Peer review"? Like in the hockey stick chart?
George Kasimos January 30, 2013 at 06:50 pm
Dear Press, Public Officials and Flood Insurance Property Owners:
What we want are our Politicians to change; 1) A thorough re-evaluation of the flood zones, in a timely fashion. 2) Evaluating if we raise the dunes a few feet if it will significantly reduce all our flood levels and insurance premiums. 3) Getting quick answers as to who gets the mitigation grants, when they get the grant and for how much. 4) Creative ways to lower our flood insurance premiums 5) Grace period of a few years before the rise in flood insurance premiums 6) FEMA to notify all homeowners of the impending new flood insurance rates and elevation requirements What we want from all Flood Insurance homeowners to do; 1) Copy and paste this email and send to your local, state, federal politicians and members of Press. 2) Form Coalition to protect our interests. 3) Spread the word to your neighbors George Kasimos www.facebook.com/StopFemaNow
john miller April 16, 2013 at 02:47 pm
we need to build farther away from the shores and build some type of wall so if it floods it wont flood the whole city
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bowie Thelonius June 19, 2013 at 09:27 am
I doubt it. People love to complain :) Myself included I suppose.
Happy Point Beacher June 19, 2013 at 01:37 pm
Too bad. I don't complain where it will do no good. I do complain when it can change things for theRead More better. Don't waste your time or be negative.