Water Surcharge Is Solution to Needed Open Space Funding

Our open space funding has run dry but a water user surcharge would help provide millions of dollars for land conservation each year.

Funding for open space has run out.  The last of the voter approved monies are being issued now and for the first time in decades we are out of open space funding.

These issues are especially important in the Highlands region.  The area provides drinking water for 5.4 million state residents and is protected under the 2004 Highlands Act, which protects the most sensitive drinking water supply areas in the region from development.  

Governor Christie has stated the Highlands was “based on a lie” because it does not compensate landowners, but has then turned around and cut funding for Highlands municipalities and implemented policies that undermine Highlands protections instead of putting in place programs to compensate landowners such as a water surcharge.

At the town hall meeting in West Milford this month, Governor Christie said he has not entertained the idea of a water surcharge but two years ago he said he was considering the fee.  All he is doing is pandering to special interests and trying to weaken protections for our water supply. 

A water surcharge would establish a long term stable open space funding source that would compensate landowners in the Highlands region for protecting land that the rest of the state depends upon for clean drinking water.  Polls show overwhelming public support for open space preservation, fueled by wide spread support for protecting our drinking water sources.  The public understands the connection between water quality and open space preservation and would not mind paying a small fee to protect our water supplies.

The water surcharge should be constitutionally dedicated so it could not be used for other purposes, establishing a direct connection between the fee and open space preservation. We should not be cutting other programs such as education, property tax relief, or the DEP to fund open space; that is why we need a dedicated source.   We cannot keep depending on bonds for open space funds.    

New Jersey’s three largest industries, pharmaceuticals, food processing, and tourism, are all water dependent and this fee would ensure they continue to have the water supply they need. 

The cost of a small water surcharge is less than buying a couple of bottles of water a week, but would have a long lasting value in preserving open space and protecting water supply for future generations.

A water surcharge would increase municipal support of open space programs.  This fee would help cover lost tax revenue resulting from the preservation of open space.   

The Ringwood Environmental Commission in 1989, when I was a member, first came up with a water surcharge as a way to fund open space preservation and provide tax relief to watershed municipalities.  The Sierra Club was one of first groups to support it.  There were hearings on the proposal in the 1990’s and the surcharge had bipartisan support.  It is more important now than ever as the best way to fund these open space programs.

A water surcharge would help fund the Blue Acres program which moves people out of harm’s way and protects families from the impacts of flooding.

A water surcharge would help promote water conservation as well.  In the New Jersey American Water system about 12 or 13 percent of water is lost as it leaks from pipes.  A surcharge would address those wastes.

Newark sells half its water to other communities for a profit so the surcharge would not have an undue impact on the residents of Newark.

The water surcharge would serve as a stable source of open space funding as well as helping to fund programs that help municipalities with preserved land.   His first year in office Governor Christie slashed $10 million from the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) program, which helps municipalities make up for lost tax revenue when buying open space.   The Governor has also cut Watershed Moratorium aid, costing towns millions of dollars. 

The Governor  should be coming up with compensation programs, such as a water surcharge, for municipalities instead of cutting those programs.  For example, 30 years ago Newark paid West Milford $3 million on its watershed lands, now the city is paying about $800,000.  Newark has repeatedly appealed the land valuation based on the Watershed Moratorium Act and conservation easements on their properties. 

The Watershed Moratorium Act came about because United Water wanted to sell off watershed lands in Bergen County to their development arm.  We do not want to see those critical water supply lands in West Milford turned over to development at the expense of water quality and the municipality should receive some funding for protecting those lands.  

The Governor should support a water surcharge as a way to help communities, support open space, and provide equity to landowners.  He has cut open space funding and municipal aid with no plans for the future.  We are concerned that the Governor would rather eliminate protections in the Highlands region and cut aid to municipalities instead of supporting a common sense solution to open space preservation and municipal aid.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Pilgrim October 26, 2012 at 10:14 PM
Water is going to get very expensive in the not too didtant future -- think Las Vegas. Read the book The Big Thirst. With this noted, adding to the cost of water (water tax) with a surcharge for open space which is already taxed is not one of Mr. Tittel brighter ideas. Find another source of revenue for open space funding -- like eliminating all of the farming tax breaks that go to non-farmers.
bayboat October 26, 2012 at 10:26 PM
I love Jeff's line that "the public wouldn't mind paying a fee" Very nice of Jeff to speak for " the public". I'm not sure that's part of his job description, and I don't know what percentage of the public actually agrees with him .(probably a much smaller group than he thinks) Thanks anyway jeff ..." the public " can speak for themselves and does NOT need a self appointed representative.
Big Whitey October 26, 2012 at 10:49 PM
Jeff is an idiot, and has been for a while. I wonder when the last time he had a job was. If he did, he wouldnt be so quick to spend our money. People like him dont understand we need to frack and drill to keep people working and prices low. I bet his non-profit group pays him very well, and he goes to plenty of functions where he wines and dines for free. Get a real Job Jeff and see things through taxpayers eyes.
John Hayes October 27, 2012 at 09:52 PM
Always easier to spend other people's money.
Typical Obama Voter October 27, 2012 at 10:09 PM
The majority of open space purchases and farm preservation purchases are made from politically connected land owners and politicians and their friends and families. Open space tax and purchase i just another one of the big scams perpetrated on the gullible, ignorant, head in the sand tax payers.
Irina October 28, 2012 at 01:54 AM
"the public wouldn't mind paying a fee" Jeff I'm telling United Water to send you my fee. You're such a jerk Jeff. How many more things is this Jeff and if fanatical mindless booby group gonna destroy. GET A LIFE JEFF. LEAVE MINE ALONE.
Mrgrumpass October 29, 2012 at 10:56 AM
Jeff Your hart is in the right place but this endeavor of yours has its hand in my pocket and that’s not going to work! The people of this state have funded (wasted is more like it) open space projects for decades with little result or can I say NO PAY BACK the open space projects of which I speak are as follows Camden, Jersey City, Trenton, Asbury Park, and Paterson, it the taxpayer funded waste were corrected in these open space projects there would be ample funds to fund your open space projects!
Mark Richert October 30, 2012 at 12:25 AM
What certain morons don't realize, is that suburban development, clearing more trees for development is more then a "hand your pocket." It is why, if I return home after Sandy that I won't have a home. All that run-off from all the parking lots -- and all the support for suburban development -- is what floods into our streams, bays, rivers, and ultimately the ocean during storms, vs. the rainfall soaking into the ground, and/or being mitigated by natural systems. This is a cost that developers took "out of our pockets" -- flooding and fouled public waters. The inability of people in New Jersey to recognize the true costs of development coupled with a "Soprano's State" governance has turned a jewel into a fouled toilet.
Jeff Kenny November 02, 2012 at 01:09 PM
Jeff - get off the Internet - you are a MORON!!!!!! Any fee, tax or other creative term the politicians have come up with that people pay in NJ today just goes into a general slush fund - not to ANY specific purpose. No matter how the law or fee is structured, it NEVER goes for the intended purpose and never will. We pay the highest taxes in the nation - OPEN SPACE WILL NEVER BE A SOLUTION. Get a clue and get out of the state - you are the reason the state is in as bad a condition as it is.
PPNB November 03, 2012 at 11:24 AM
Very good idea. We are not paying the true cost of water now. Yes, " The Big Thirst ". Is a eye opener. Water is the next big commodity.
Frederick John LaVergne for Congress November 03, 2012 at 12:52 PM
Jeff, I respectfully disagree. Better monitoring of the use of those funds is needed. I will be filing OPRA request after OPRA request with my fellows in the D/R party. Watch for the fireworks. (Property purchased on the cheap, then sold via open-space for a huge gain - gaming the system with your money) The largest fresh-water aquifer in the US is right here in NJ.
Frederick John LaVergne for Congress November 03, 2012 at 12:53 PM
(sold TO open-space - it's the old corrupt "off ramp" dealing, writ large)
Bill Erikson November 04, 2012 at 08:06 PM
Jeff, that is SO easy for you to say. Tell me what your family income is. I'm sure you can well afford it. My water bill in Lacey is high enough. I probably conserve more, and use less than you.
Xavier November 06, 2012 at 08:01 PM
In the interest of full disclosure, Mr Titel is the Chapter Director of the NJ Sierra Club. I don't see him disclosing that anywhere.
Project Bluebeam November 06, 2012 at 08:04 PM
Smells like the stench of Agenda 21.
Edward Hotel November 06, 2012 at 08:12 PM
Project Bluebeam.. yes exactly, this is textbook Agenda 21 procedure. They want to make it look like Island Beach State Park.
Project Bluebeam November 06, 2012 at 08:17 PM
And they're going to do the same on the barrier islands. Screw the property owners. Nobody is allowed over, grab your stuff and get out quick. They'll bulldoze your home then "reclaim" it in the name of mother Gaia.
Mike D November 10, 2012 at 09:31 PM
Ocean levels rising, cost of water skyrocketing, how about a desalinization plant? Oh yeah, what if we put another inlet at the end of Mantoloking Road before we rebuild. A couple of concrete tunnels about 50 feet wide buried below grade. Think that would help our Bay Jeff?
Typical Obama Voter November 11, 2012 at 06:36 PM
We need to conserve oil. Obama and his rich friends need it to fly around the world in their jumbo jets. They need to fly, we don't. We must conserve to save the planet.
oldsoldier November 11, 2012 at 10:25 PM
In my opinion, and contrary to Mr. Tittel's, the purchase of open space, like so many other projects, should be locally based. That is, the municipality through voter referendum, rather than the County, State or other appointed "commission" should decide what monies should be raised and allocated for the purchase of public space. I would agree that the County or State should make such a decision if the problem extends beyond a municipality's, or for that matter a County's borders. Unfortunately, Mr. Tittel's position is representative of a much larger problem. A few people, rather than "We the People" find that they are alone suited to decide what we want and how to pay for it. Elected officials are obviously empowered to do so, as a representiative republic. But commissions, boards and other select entities should not be given such power over us.
ANTHONY CASTELLANO November 12, 2012 at 01:24 PM
Donna Griffin November 12, 2012 at 01:29 PM
Anthony - The majority of Americans are OK with more taxes. That's why they voted to re-elect Pres. Obama. New Jerseyans, in particular, have no room to complain. Just wait until January 1st. That's when the real pain will be felt.
Slippery Slope November 12, 2012 at 04:01 PM
Like ^^^^^
Jim November 12, 2012 at 08:39 PM
The US is at the lowest tax rate in 40 years across the board, but in particular for those who can most afford it (IE those making over 150,000). And we are now suffering from the stupidity of those who think taxing things is a crime as our infrastructure is crumbling while those of China and other countries are being built up. The simple fact is taxes in the US NEED to go up. Most people realize this fact, even Republicans who campaign under no taxes since all of them inact taxes themselves, it is just the dumb masses of the 48% who voted for Romnie who didn't understand macroeconomics who think taxes are a bad thing.
D'isiah T Billings-Clyde November 12, 2012 at 09:02 PM
Yeah Jim that's brilliant. NJ taxpayers are undertaxed! High income tax. high sales tax. Super high property taxes. High gas tax. Tell you what, if you want to save some land, pay for it yourself. And Donna 60% of white voters ie taxpayers didn't support Obama. 95% of those who don't pay taxes did. Now let me see, if I don't pay taxes now and I can get someone else to pay more, I still pay nothing. WHOOOOEEEE what a deal!!! Does that come with free cable? Oh and Jim, taxes have very little to do with $16 trillion in debt which is caused by not living within yuor means. What have they been borrowing and spending on all this time if not infrastructure? Don't welfare payments fix roads and bridges? I have a suggestion, let's cut government pay and pensions and use it to fix roads and bridges. Problem solved. These people can afford more taxes right.
Coach Outlet Online December 01, 2012 at 08:17 AM
on Palestinians and their http://www.coachfactoryoutletcc.us Coach Outlet Online to help end the fighting. http://www.guccibeltsoutletstores.net Gucci Belts of the bloodshed, and o http://www.coachoutletonlinewo.com Coach Outlet Store Washington, Obama administration http://www.coachfactorystoredo.com Coach Factory Online to help end the fighting. http://www.coachfactoryoutletpo.com Coach Factory Outlet Online Vof the bloodshed, and o http://www.coachoutletonlinefc.org Coach Outlet Online had asked Egypt to use http://www.coachoutletwr.com Coach Bags Outlet Washington, Obama administration http://www.coachoutletloa.com Coach Factory Online on Palestinians and their http://www.coachoutletonlineyu.net Coach Factory Outlet Online to help end the fighting. http://www.coachfactoryonlineen.com Coach Outlet Online f the siege suffering.In http://www.hermesbeltsod.net Hermes Belt had asked Egypt to use http://www.coachoutletonlinefs.com Coach Boots Outlet to help end the fighting. http://www.coachoutletstoreps.com Coach Outlet Store Online Washington, Obama administration http://www.coachfactoryoutletbo.net Coach Factory Outlet Online on Palestinians and their http://www.coachfactoryoutletdt.us Coach Factory Online


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something