.
News Alert
Father, Mother, Daughter Arrested In Heroin Raid…

OPINION: Point Pleasant Boro: Get Ready For New Tax Increase

Ever wonder why local governments have so much trouble meeting their budgets, which inevitably leads to tax increases? The answer is a lack of planning!

Let's take a look at the Point Pleasant Boro and the Point Pleasant Boro Council.

There is an article in a local publication about the necessity of the Boro to replace its aging sewer pumping stations. The cost of the replacement is $1.6 million dollars. Mayor William Schroeder appeared to be proud of the fact that half the cost could be borne by the federal government through a grant program. Will the remaining $800,000 be paid by the Point Pleasant taxpayers? Where will the money come from?

This is what I believe will happen: The Boro will borrow the money, thus increasing debt. You have to wonder where the mayor thinks the federal grant money came from. If you are thinking federal tax dollars, you thought correctly.

Look, if the pumping stations have to be replaced, they should be, but my criticism is how they are being paid for. An utter lack of planning is the culprit, and the Boro Council continues to lack planning foresight.

In this case, the council is sorely lacking in knowledge about "Tax Policy," which is almost an academic discipline. 

Tax policy is used to obtain the funds to provide a reasonable amount of services to a community. But, it is also used to influence people's behaviors. For example, there are enormous taxes on tobacco products. Part of the tax is use to offset the cost of medical care for those who will inevitably become seriously ill from the use of tobacco. But, the high tax is also aimed at deterring people from using tobacco at all.

Tax policy is also use for social engineering. In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson, had a problem. He felt he had to fight the Vietnam War, which was disastrously expensive, but he also wanted to leave behind a personal legacy, The Great Society. His problem was how to find funding for both.

His solution...he convinced Congress to permit the federal government to borrow money from the Social Security Trust Fund and leave in its place an I.O.U. Then, Congress approved funding for the Great Society...think social welfare programs of gigantic proportion the cap-stone of which was the high-rise low-rent condos in large cities all across America. You know, the ones that are now drug-infested, gang infested dilapidated buildings that are in such deplorable condition that they are regularly torn down as community blight.

Now we have a Social Security System on the verge of bankruptcy, America is nearly $18 trillion dollars in debt with tens of trillions of future financial obligations. America is facing a crisis in Tax Policy.

New Jersey has the highest tax structure in the U.S. Working and living here is tremendously expensive. How did happen? Well, part of the blame lies with local government, just like the one in Point Pleasant Boro.

Do you think that the Borh Council has ever sat down and had a meaningful discussion about tax policy? The answer is NO! Why, you may ask...probably because they don't even know they should.

Let's talk about hotels...that's right hotels. Maintenance of hotels is expensive, and since room rentals are elastic (subject to marketplace circumstances) and can't always be depended upon to fund maintenance, another way had to be devised. Did you ever plan an event a hotel...like a wedding? If so, you are a familiar with the 20 percent gratuity that is attached to the final bill. If you thought that fee was for the hotel service personnel you would be wrong. Actually, 5 percent of that fee goes into the hotel coffers and is used for maintenance and much more.

The point here is that hotels have figured out a way to fund maintenance so as to take the pressure off hotel room rentals that has its ups and downs. Wouldn't it be novel for local government to examine tax policy to devise a means to lighten the burden of huge outlays that are inevitable? 

Let's see now...wouldn't it have been wise for the then council to have on the very day that the sewer pumping stations were built to create a set-aside fund for the replacement costs that would surely come? The reality is that politicians don't think that way! They have unlimited taxing authority that the citizens gave them and they are of the mindset that when capital expenses occur we either just raise taxes or borrow the money, thus encumbering future tax payers. The same goes for community equipment and other costs that will require maintenance or replacement...think police cars, etc.

While on the subject, you are aware that Point Pleasant Boro hired four new police officers over the past few years. The council suggests we need them to fight the "War on Drugs", and the cost of the new police is rather small...after all they are paid low starting salaries. The council never talks about the hidden cost of municipal hiring.

Each of the officers gets several uniforms, a gun, a tremendous pension, health care etc. They also climb the pay ladder rather quickly to a $100,000 job. Then too, there will be a need soon for there to be additional police cruisers and each one of the new policemen has to assigned and supervised...think more supervisors. The public is being deceived about the true cost of more police.

The Boro Council is again flying by the seat of its collective pants. There is no tax policy and they are falling into the same trap that has led NJ to be the most heavily taxed people in the nation...NO PLANNING!

The Borough Council just bought highly desirable land. Where is that money coming from? Think borrowing it! I am sure that each council member had some vague notion in mind when they voted for the purchase, but that is not the way taxpayer money should be spent...spend and then think of a reason. Did anyone see an analysis of all the Boro's land holdings? In other words, what land does the Boro own and what is it being used for? Did anyone see an analysis of purchase plans...a plan how to consolidate, sell other land or otherwise modify the use of the land owned? 

The Borough Council is a highly reactive body. In other words, they spend most of their time dealing with problems that come up. They steadfastly refuse to strategically plan and tax policy is a topic that is not even a consideration. What does it take to get the Council in Point Pleasant Boro to plan strategically?

What do you think?

P.S. The new Master Plan for land use is sorely lacking. There is not a single word in the Plan about how to upgrade the community...in other words make it more desirable to live here. There is a reason Spring Lake looks the way it does and why the land values are astronomical and recession proof...a group of people planned it that way! The single most important job of the Council is to INCREASE land value. Just think about that for a moment. Suppose the value of your home or land rose and continued to rise as a direct result of the policies of your Council. Would you be happy? Do you think that such an action would stabilize the tax rate? Do you think it would help the community attract business, thus creating jobs?

There is not a word in the Plan about getting boats and mobile homes off people's lawns. Not a word about using Tax Policy to encourage home owners and businesses to "beautify." There isn't even a clear and precise Mission Statement as a preface to the Master Land Use Plan to signify to the public what the Council is trying to achieve. A Plan like that would be helpful and important. As it is the Plan is nothing more than an action by the Council to get something on paper to satisfy legal requirements! When asked, each Council member says, "I am trying to make our community a great place to live and grow a family." That is a platitude, a campaign slogan! We have yet to see a vision of how to do that and a strategic plan to implement that vision!



This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Spooner April 27, 2014 at 11:06 AM
@Victor- if your still out there...here's some more great waterfront prices: 1732-34 Bay Isle(bay front)- with 2-lot subdivision(100X195-234);again in Bay Head Shores, sold to a builder for $500,000. Property assessment on those two lots was $1,726,000...
Alex Viecelli April 27, 2014 at 11:38 AM
@ Spooner. my neighbor got sick and had to sell his house. He had it on the market for 1.25 million. He got 1.1 million. You know where I live and you know we don't have a great view but it is a wide lagoon. His taxes are 15,750 A year the last time I checked. I never thought the house would go for that number but it did. Water front is still a good investment as your primary home. But I would be very cautious about buying empty waterfront lots here in NJ as investments. land and taxes are way to high.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »