Maybe the District 4 Parking Plan wasn't such a bad idea after all.
Then again, maybe it was.
Point Beach Republican candidates Andy Cortes and Stephen Reid, who had always been staunchly against the overnight parking restrictions established this summer for non-residents in District 4, now say that maybe they're in favor of it.
If they're elected, would they vote for it next year? Maybe they would. But maybe they wouldn't.
The two said at Thursday night's council candidates forum that they've been doing a lot of walking door to door and talking with residents in District 4 and beyond. They said they're hearing a lot of reports that the parking plan helped cut down on noise and litter while it was in effect from early summer until Sept. 15.
So the two candidates elected to two, three year seats will have to decide whether to re-institute the parking plan for next summer and also how to contend with the related lawsuits.
The two council seats up for grabs are now held by Reid and Democrat Tim Lurie who is not running for reelection. Council members are paid a stipend of $4,500 annually.
The Republicans are challenged by Independent Tom Davis and Democrats Barry Moffett and Sharon Cadalzo. All five candidates were at the forum moderated by The League of Women Voters and hosted by the Woman's Club on St. Louis Avenue.
Cadalzo lives on Atlantic Avenue in District 3; Moffett lives on Ocean Avenue in District 3; Cortes lives on Washington Avenue in District 3; Reid lives on New Jersey Avenue in District 2; and Davis lives on Trenton Avenue in District 2.
Backing Into a Parking Plan
Watching the GOP backpedal halfway down the street on the matter of the parking plan was hardly a welcome spectacle for Martin "Red" Stillufsen, owner of Red's Lobster Pot on Inlet Drive. He and his family have made no secret of the fact that they have opposed the parking plan and the attempt to shut down bars at midnight.
"When are you going to decide if you're for the parking plan?" Stillufsen asked Reid.
Reid said again that he and Cortes are still walking and talking and trying to decide. After Stillufsen asked a couple more times, Reid finally said, "I'll have that for the next council meeting."
"Good man!" Stillufsen said. Reid added that perhaps parking restricions are not needed in the Inlet Drive area where Stillufsen's restaurant is located.
Kitty Stillufsen, Martin Stillufsen's daughter, said recently on the Point Pleasant Patch Facebook page that her family has the seasonal restaurant up for sale.
Cadalzo and Moffett said they are against the parking plan. Cadalzo said she would look at innovative ways to implement a paid parking plan that does not involve the posting of signs and meters which the public has not wanted.
Moffett said it has hurt local businesses and should not be implemented again.
Davis said he recognizes that many District 4 residents have said the restrictions helped cut down on noise in the wee hours of the morning, but he would like to analyze police data from this summer, compared to the past two years, to try to evaluate its effectiveness.
"We should have had a set of control measures in place so we can evaluate it," he said.
Reid said he is "angry" that a number of permanent residents received parking tickets when residents are supposed to be exempt from the parking plan. He said perhaps if the plan is re-established, there should be a sticker for cars instead of placards which sometimes got misplaced and weren't always hanging in residents' cars, leading to tickets.
A Flier, A Tongue-Lashing and Agendas
Another unexpected twist during the evening took place when Davis began saying something that sounded like it was going to be a challenge to Reid's recent campaign literature. However, Davis was out of time and never voiced it. All answers to questions were timed by Lois Jacobsen of the League.
But Reid then said, "Tom, I want to know where you stand on Mike Corbally's flier."
Moderator Gail Marsh Saxer said, "Mr. Reid, Mr. Reid," a few times and finally got Reid to stop questioning Davis, but not before Reid remarked that Davis was conducting "negative campaigning."
The contents or reason to question "Mike Corbally's flier" was never explained.
Afterwards, Saxer, who also moderated last year's council forum, said that in the format of the evening, candidates were not permitted to "denigrate, question or challenge each other," only to make opening and closing statements and to take questions from the audience.
In separate remarks, Davis emphasized that he is an "independent" in the truest sense, that the town's Independent party is not a force for furthering political careers but is, instead, an organization concerned about improving and protecting the rights of, and improving the quality of life for, residents.
"I don't have an agenda," Davis said, contrasting that to other candidates and parties that he said do have "agendas.
"We want a sustainable business community and stable taxes," he said. He said he thinks the most important issue the town faces is the need for a lot more long-term planning.
Kristin Hennessy, a New Jersey Avenue resident and former president of the local Republican Club, said she was concerned about Davis' statement about other candidates and political groups having "agendas."
"It's a little bit insulting," she said. "I would like to ask the other candidates, 'Do you have an agenda? If so, what is your agenda that you hope to accomplish?"
Cadalzo said, "I can tell you that the Democratic party does not have an agenda at all. We talk about what's been going on at the council meetings and then we move on."
A few minutes later, when it was his turn to answer, her running mate, Moffett, said, "I hate to contradict Sharon, but I do have an agenda. I think the pendulum has been going too far against businesses.
"I tried to open a pool hall and I was turned down for the most moronic reasons I ever heard," said Moffett, who had said he owns a number of companies and race horses. He said the town has to talk to and work with businesses to come up with better solutions for the town, businesses and residents.
Reid and Cortes said they have no agenda.
The election is Nov. 6.
Stephen Reid filed an appeal on his NJ Ave home. The Storino's filed an appeal on their properities and it cost PPB over $500,000 to pay the Storino's for being over taxed. Property tax appeals are totally legal and we should not read anything more into taxpayer's and spooners comments. As usual they are just trying to make some people look bad. George Loder
Maybe I'll vote for you. Probably I won't. The voters were quite clear on OUR opinion of the parking scam. The Mayor and Council of District 4 just decided to go ahead and implement it anyhow. After all, silly voters, what do they know? We'll just go ahead and do what we please. THEY (the ones who voted in favor of the scam) should be paying for the lawsuits, not the rest of us.
...but the questions to ask yourself...is why they would want that public information removed. . .What is it they're trying to hide, and who does it effect. . .That should raise issues of trust and character of that person...being on Council.
You may want to check out his personal Facebook page. Or his campaign Facebook page. Or his blog. Or email him. Or meet him as he campaigns thru town going door to door. You coulda came to candidates night to meet him.... That about covers it. As to being "blasted with negative campaign material." That one is so bogus, it will pass w/o comment. Hope I was able to clarify these matters.
Nice to see you back, always entertaining!
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Tom-Davis-for-Point-Pleasant-Beach-Independent-for-Council-2012/261056253999969
1 house can't be built on 2 50x100 lots without appearing before Planning Board and getting the 2 lots combined into 1 100x100 lot. Contamination is from the gas station on the corner. Most of the buildings in that area have that issue from the gas station, closed up laundromat, and from the old cleaners at Joe Leone's new property.
The other matter has to do with the subject of the blog posting itself: "my thoughts on the pilot parking plan"... ...it never ceases to amaze me after somebody becomes an announced candidate, they have a lot to say about town controversial issues. . .But again I'll ask: where were you for the past two years when first the parking plan was voted down by referendum, only to be proposed by ordinance afterword. . .and passed. Did I miss your name on any of the Council meeting minutes or in the Ocean Star. Please if you did make public statements(comments) on the parking plan prior to your candidacy, can you provide the meeting dates you did. http://www.simplesite.com/thdavis2012/116647248
D4 was quieter at night this last summer. That calmer atmosphere is probably due to both the Parking Plan and the increased Police Presence. Regardless most of the D4er's I spoke to think that it was a good thing. There was also better parking options for renters especially in the Bungalow section. Does it need to be adjusted? It helped that is was a one year plan, so that adjustment can be incorporated! Should the one year D4 Parking plan be made permanent? Most of my neighbors thinks so! Should it be extended outside district 4 ? Yes, on a street by street basis, if those residents ask for it! They could easily petetion for it! After all we are a government for the people, by the people! Long live the parking plan!!