Point Beach Parking Regulation Proposals On Hold, For Now

Council considering amending code dealing with overnight parking of commercial vehicles, eligibility and restrictions on parking decal program

Two measures that would impact parking regulations in Point Pleasant Beach will be subject to further discussion before the Borough Council votes to amend existing code.

The council elected to continue working on an ordinance amendment affecting the overnight parking of commercial vehicles at its regular meeting Tuesday night before presenting it to the full council for introduction.

Later, the council put off introducing an amendment that would alter the regulations governing the resident parking pass program after much discussion on its provisions.

Commercial vehicles

Police Chief Kevin O'Hara has recommended tighter restrictions on the overnight parking of commercial or oversize vehicles on borough roadways, which he says is hurting the ability of residents and merchants to park.

"Right now the ordinance doesn't cover prohibiting, whether it be daytime or nighttime, the parking of commercial vehicles on roadways," O'Hara said.

"My suggestion was to amend the ordinance to include a prohibition of commercial vehicles 8,000 pounds or more... just to alleviate the issues that have been brought forward to council."

Existing code does prohibit vehicles heavier than 8,000 pounds from being parked on streets in a residential zone for more than an hour, while carving an exception for those vehicles needed by a contractor or vendor to complete services or deliver goods. 

The chief noted that the proposal was made in response to issues on certain streets, although council members said they'd have to be careful with an amendment's reach if they alter the existing provisions. 

Councilmen Stephen Reid and William Mayer noted that the council needs to be careful in applying restrictions on residents who happen to be contractors and park their work vehicles at their homes.

Mayor Vincent Barrella agreed, saying the ordinance amendment needs to "put in effect safeguards we need to make sure that residents of Point Pleasant Beach either are able to park somewhere else or will be able to continue to park because of their resident status."

Council voted unanimously (with members Tim Lurie and Kristine Tooker absent) to allow borough attorney Sean Gertner to work with O'Hara on the specific language of such an amendment, which Gertner said will be presented to council committee before the full governing body considers it. 

Parking pass

The council also debated amending borough code to further restrict the use of parking decals in municipal lots while reducing their price.

However, after much debate on eligibility, the governing body decided not to introduce the amendment as planned and will instead hold a first reading at its next regular meeting.

Currently, it costs $30 for a decal that can be used instead of feeding parking meters, with a four-hour limit on spots, other than the railroad station lot. Existing code bans residents from parking on weekends in the Silver Lake lot, as well as both sides of Ocean Avenue, from Parkway to Trenton Avenue.

Crucially, the program is currently available only to residents who claim Point Pleasant Beach as their permanent address and live in the borough at least nine months a year. Additionally, the borough allows two passes per residential dwelling.

Under a draft ordinance available Tuesday night, decals would cost $10, with a two-hour limit on spots. The decals would not be able to be used at any time to park in the Silver Lake lot, the railroad station lot or the lot at the southeast corner of Ocean and New Jersey avenues.

Additionally, the draft expands eligibility to "residential taxpayers," defined as someone who owns a dwelling and resides in the borough on at least a seasonal basis. Only one decal would be issued per residential unit instead of two.

The latter provision provoked much discussion among council members, who debated whether decals should be limited to year-round residents, renters who live year-round, those who rent seasonally, "absentee landlords," etc.

Councilman Mayer said the solution is simple: one decal should be issued per residence, regardless of who's using it. "You pick one car and that's your car," he said.

Administrator Christine Riehl agreed. "Does it matter who's using it?" she asked.

Barrella, however, was concerned landlords could exploit such an amendment redefining eligibility, effectively creating a black market for parking decals.

"You're going to have landlords effectively trafficking," the mayor said.

Councilman Michael Corbally, who indicated his displeaure with the entire parking pass system due to "loss of revenue" from those not feeding meters, did however agree that a decal could be seen as a perk by a tenant. 

Reid was in favor of voting on the amendment introduction Tuesday night. The mayor disagreed.

"If someone wants to introduce it in its current state, feel free. I don't know what its current state is," Barrella said in exasperation.

The council ultimately agreed to continue to work out the potential problems on residency and eligibility and hold off introducing the measure.

Mike Corbally February 23, 2012 at 09:54 PM
Call me and I will be happy to discuss it with you.
Part Timer February 24, 2012 at 10:12 PM
Here is a thought, Pass the overnight parking plan for district 4 (12 - 6 AM) so that the residents will have some quality of life back and the pub crawlers will have to pay at the meter which will create revenue for the town. Any Thoughts...
A Resident February 26, 2012 at 12:14 AM
True, but for the many of us that have lived here for a lot of years....that lot will always be known as Risdens South.
Mary Smith April 28, 2012 at 05:30 PM
I own a residence in PPB and pay huge property taxes. I recently got a threatening letter about CO enforcement that requires I pay $300 (which doubled from last year) on top of the $4K plus taxes I pay to own my house. I don't send children to school in this town and I am sick of people trying to get there hands in my pocket. I know one thing that tourism makes money for the town. All the businesses need the tourism so stop treating the tourist like they are villains. My suggestion is you monitor your expenses. I have a college degree in computer science and master in finance and I have never made what your Police Lt. makes in one year. The town has 3K full time residents (all who probably have cushy jobs in town) and they are the only ones who can vote. This is what needs to change. If you pay the taxes you should have a right to vote on what happens in this town. I don't want parking changes and I don't want bars closing at midnight.
A Resident April 29, 2012 at 02:34 AM
"The town has 3K full time residents (all who probably have cushy jobs in town) " Yup, PPB employs 3000 people. Thanks for showing why you don't deserve to get a vote on anything in town. Maybe if you knew anything actually going on and/or about the town...we'd care. $4000 taxes in which you probably make that in 2 weeks worth of rentals.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »